Subject: RE: bug#11326: 24.1.50; doc of `dired-recursive-copies', `dired-recursive-deletes'

From: "Drew Adams" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:46:46 -0700

> The doc string for `dired-recursive-deletes' is slightly better than
> that for `dired-recursive-copies', because it at least 
> mentions deleting recursively.

This part was wrong.  They both mention copying/deleting recursively.

But the rest of what I wrote was correct.  It is misleading and unclear to talk
about recursive copies etc.