GNU bug report logs -
#11319
[PATCH 1/2] BUGFIX: select current-diff-comparison regions for ediff-inferior-compare-regions correctly
Previous Next
Reported by: Dave Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:30:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Merged with 9678,
10984,
11318
Found in versions 24.0.50, 24.0.94
Fixed in version 24.4
Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
on Mon Dec 17 2012, Michael Kifer <michael.kifer-AT-stonybrook.edu> wrote:
> On 12/17/2012 06:22 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
> on Fri Dec 14 2012, Michael Kifer <michael.kifer-AT-stonybrook.edu> wrote:
>
>
> I think it is a good patch. One question: shouldn't the message
> "Which buffer to compare to the merge buffer (A or B)? ")
> be then changed to this?
> "Which buffer to compare to the ancestor buffer (A or B)? ")
>
> This is not part of the #11320 patch.
>
> I have no opinion about the change from "merge" to "ancestor." It makes
> absolutely no difference to me which of those words Emacs uses; I'll
> interpret it exactly the same way. I suggest you accept the patch as-is
> and open a separate issue if you think the word is wrong.
>
> The merge buffer is not the ancestor buffer, so the message would be
> wrong and confusing.
> We should change both or none.
I can't understand the idea that you can't correct the behavior without
also correcting the text. They are separate issues related only by the
region of code in which they appear. Again, I have no opinion about
whether the text should change, so if you're going to tie them together,
please change the text too. The behavior is all that matters to me
--
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing Software Development Training
http://www.boostpro.com Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers C++ Boost
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 159 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.