GNU bug report logs - #11318
[Patchset] A bugfix and an arguable bugfix for ediff-inferior-compare-regions

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dave Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com>

Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:30:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Merged with 9678, 10984, 11319

Found in versions 24.0.50, 24.0.94

Fixed in version 24.4

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #22 received at 11318 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Dave Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com>, 11318 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#11318: [Patchset] A bugfix and an arguable bugfix for
	ediff-inferior-compare-regions
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 13:18:45 -0400
>> Arguably, debbugs (sh|c)ould pay attention to the References: (or
>> In-reply-to:) header to automatically put the replies in the same bug as
>> their "parent" message.
> It does (I added this feature), but:

Good, thanks.  I did remember you adding such a thing, but I figured it
must have been something slightly different.

> a) It needs time (I think) to process the first message and update the
> bug index with the message-id, so if all messages arrive at the same
> instant, it doesn't work.

Oh, yes, that's a real bummer.  So we'd have to sequentialize processing
of incoming messages (if it's not done yet) and handle the message-ids
both ways: i.e. recognize when a message comes after its reply and put
it in the same bug-id.  That could be tricky/risky indeed.

> b) I made the decision to require a subject starting with "Re:" for this
> to take effect, because sometimes people reply to an old message and
> change the subject with the intention of creating a new report.
> (I'm pretty sure I've said this before.)
> I'm feeling like I should admit defeat on this aspect, since it seems
> people just love messing around with the subject header.

Is there an easy way to see (in retrospect) whether this "Re:" filtering
did the right thing more often than not?

> I also added something that makes [patch] equivalent to
> Tags:patch

Great, tho it doesn't seem to be used much.


        Stefan




This bug report was last modified 12 years and 154 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.