GNU bug report logs - #11220
uniq -d and -Du bug?

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 11220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: phil colbourn <philcolbourn <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 11220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#11220: uniq -d and -Du bug?
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:59:31 +0200

phil colbourn wrote:

> What should this print?
>
> echo -e 'aa\naa\naa\n' | uniq -d

It's better to avoid echo -e.  Use printf instead:

    printf 'aa\naa\naa\n' | uniq -d

> To me this says:
>
> 1. uniqueness is defined by whole line so there is 1 unique value 'aa';
> 2. -d option say to 'only print duplicate lines';

When in doubt, follow the advice at the bottom of the man page
and read the "real" (texinfo) documentation:

       The full documentation for uniq is maintained as a Texinfo manual.   If
       the  info  and  uniq  programs are properly installed at your site, the
       command

              info coreutils 'uniq invocation'

       should give you access to the complete manual.

> 3. 1st 'aa' is (so far) unique so it should NOT be printed;
> 4. 2nd 'aa' is not unique so it SHOULD be printed; and
> 5. 3rd 'aa' is not unique so it SHOULD also be printed.
>
> I think I should get this:
>
> aa
> aa
>
> But I get this:
>
> aa

Thanks for the report.
The problem is that the description in the man page is too succinct,
perhaps because -d means different things, depending on what other
options you use it with.

How is what you see inconsistent with the documentation?
(info coreutils uniq)

`-d'
`--repeated'
     Discard lines that are not repeated.  When used by itself, this
     option causes `uniq' to print the first copy of each repeated line,
     and nothing else.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.