From unknown Mon Sep 08 16:26:15 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#11188 <11188@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#11188 <11188@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: guile-2.0.5 issues on Solaris 11 x86_64 Reply-To: bug#11188 <11188@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 23:26:15 +0000 retitle 11188 guile-2.0.5 issues on Solaris 11 x86_64 reassign 11188 guile submitter 11188 "Nelson H. F. Beebe" severity 11188 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 05 20:04:41 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2012 00:04:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41866 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SFwfR-0007kj-8T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:04:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47357) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SFwfN-0007kY-Ox for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:04:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFwem-0002hR-8l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:04:01 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:49152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFwem-0002hJ-5G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 20:04:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFpSA-0006Tt-Ly for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:22:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFpS3-0006XX-BJ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:22:29 -0400 Received: from mail.math.utah.edu ([155.101.98.135]:56630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFpS3-0006Uk-3k for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:22:23 -0400 Received: from psi.math.utah.edu (psi.math.utah.edu [155.101.96.19]) by mail.math.utah.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q35G3TMu016455; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:03:29 -0600 (MDT) Received: from psi.math.utah.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by psi.math.utah.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q35G3T4s008007; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:03:29 -0600 (MDT) Received: (from beebe@localhost) by psi.math.utah.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q35G3TPG008006; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:03:29 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:03:29 -0600 (MDT) From: "Nelson H. F. Beebe" To: bug-guile@gnu.org X-US-Mail: "Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB, University of Utah, 155 S 1400 E RM 233, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090, USA" X-Telephone: +1 801 581 5254 X-FAX: +1 801 585 1640, +1 801 581 4148 X-URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe Subject: guile-2.0.5 issues on Solaris 11 x86_64 Message-ID: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.8 (mail.math.utah.edu [155.101.98.135]); Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:03:30 -0600 (MDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: beebe@math.utah.edu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Solaris 11 x86_64 ships with native c89, cc, and c99, and has an optional package that supplies gcc-3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-20050802). I have tried repeatedly to build many snapshots of the gc-4.x (x = 1, 2, 3, ..., 8) on this platform, and have never succeeded. Thus, there is a paucity of modern C compilers. With gcc and either -O2 or -g compilation of guile-2.0.5, there is a single test failure, arising from an internal assertion failure: make[5]: Entering directory `/local/build/bare/guile-2.0.5/test-suite/standalone' Assertion failed: SCM_I_IS_THREAD (data.thread), file threads.c, line 1135 /bin/sh: line 10: 23222: Abort FAIL: test-system-cmds ... ================================== 1 of 27 tests failed (1 test was not run) Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org ================================== When I attempt to build guile-2.0.5 with cc or c99, I get compilation failures: CC libguile_2.0_la-control.lo "control.c", line 267: directive not honored in macro argument list "control.c", line 280: directive not honored in macro argument list "control.c", line 287: EOF in argument list of macro: SCM_SNARF_INIT "control.c", line 114: EOF in argument list of macro: SCM_SNARF_INIT "control.c", line 114: syntax error before or at: = "control.c", line 114: warning: old-style declaration or incorrect type for: SCM_SNARF_INIT "control.c", line 114: syntax error before or at: sizeof "control.c", line 114: warning: undefined or missing type for: sizeof "control.c", line 114: warning: old-style declaration or incorrect type for: memcpy "control.c", line 114: identifier redeclared: memcpy current : function() returning int previous: function(restrict pointer to void, restrict pointer to const void, unsigned int) returning pointer to void : "/usr/include/iso/string_iso.h", line 54 "control.c", line 114: warning: syntax error: empty declaration "control.c", line 114: non-constant initializer: op "NAME" "control.c", line 114: non-constant initializer: op "NAME" "control.c", line 114: syntax error before or at: = "control.c", line 114: warning: old-style declaration or incorrect type for: SCM_SNARF_INIT "control.c", line 114: syntax error before or at: sizeof "control.c", line 114: warning: undefined or missing type for: sizeof "control.c", line 114: warning: old-style declaration or incorrect type for: memcpy "control.c", line 114: identifier redefined: memcpy current : function() returning int previous: function() returning int : "control.c", line 114 "control.c", line 114: warning: syntax error: empty declaration "control.c", line 114: syntax error before or at: c99: acomp failed for control.c What can we do to eliminate the cause of the assertion failure, and those compilation errors? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Nelson H. F. Beebe Tel: +1 801 581 5254 - - University of Utah FAX: +1 801 581 4148 - - Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB Internet e-mail: beebe@math.utah.edu - - 155 S 1400 E RM 233 beebe@acm.org beebe@computer.org - - Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090, USA URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 05 08:55:30 2012 Received: (at 11188-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2012 12:55:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49947 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Smlaj-0005oy-Cs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:55:30 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:37467 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Smlah-0005om-5R for 11188-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:55:27 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A743BB353; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 08:50:34 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=QyWFhZo8CrPZaE/KYhvMweO+E/g=; b=woPQc6 /NRjo8qK9YOGZ1ulCVqZAx6RIxcmwQVOONIObnNudabWBXXjWPL2GhLnUdhE/gwm NjaDW0Tom4FG7Fcgh6GhZVM+cvFzA0EKYZowB32DnsuA6SpVIDZaktvyrkEYBzwx m0GhN/JN4WSrj7A5/zhlIuLqEnl77ALUgHq9k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=EyBIhz7T8FnKOb1C7ovagGyreP/RL+qZ p2+7M1vVd2Cwz/nLXo0nwgLdfuh9JI/5G7tIl7RnVRwNpgQBBR3O3vDELcYOYPSz GT0j6RrZHZv06fYU6NuLoUYTZuG/DMD8wLZqQpD5MVTU+SEM2hgSkkjtGQX/W22e /KHETRmQ0tQ= Received: from b-pb-sasl-sd. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F066B352; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 08:50:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from badger (unknown [89.131.176.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFD26B351; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 08:50:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo To: "Nelson H. F. Beebe" Subject: Re: bug#11188: guile-2.0.5 issues on Solaris 11 x86_64 References: Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:06:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Nelson H. F. Beebe's message of "Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:03:29 -0600 (MDT)") Message-ID: <8739567hsx.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 02B13ACC-C6A0-11E1-B0BF-FA6787E41631-02397024!b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11188-done Cc: 11188-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) On Thu 05 Apr 2012 18:03, "Nelson H. F. Beebe" writes: > When I attempt to build guile-2.0.5 with cc or c99, I get compilation > failures: > > CC libguile_2.0_la-control.lo > "control.c", line 267: directive not honored in macro argument list Hi Nelson, I think this bug was fixed in 5556c17511ce19f6dfa9fc6cef0e12cf90282e9b, shortly after 2.0.5. I am provisionally marking this bug as done. Would you mind trying with a snapshot? We are due to release 2.0.6 shortly, so prompt feedback would be helpful. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ From unknown Mon Sep 08 16:26:15 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator