GNU bug report logs - #11183
[coreutils 8.13] touch: add options -v, --verbose

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#11183: closed ([coreutils 8.13] touch: add options -v, --verbose)
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 09:40:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:39:08 +0200
with message-id <87sj9qwrib.fsf <at> rho.meyering.net>
and subject line Re: bug#11183: [coreutils 8.13] touch: add options -v, --verbose
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #11183,
regarding [coreutils 8.13] touch: add options -v, --verbose
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
11183: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11183
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto <at> cante.net>
To: GNU Project <bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [coreutils 8.13] touch: add options -v, --verbose
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:14:20 +0300

Please add verbose options to program touch(1):

    -v, --verbose

Similarly than what is found in cp(1), mv(1). Seing what files are being
touched e.g. from scripts would be helpful:

    touch ${optionverbose:+--verbose} <file pattern>

Jari

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
Cc: 11183-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Jari Aalto <jari.aalto <at> cante.net>
Subject: Re: bug#11183: [coreutils 8.13] touch: add options -v, --verbose
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:39:08 +0200

tags 11183 notabug
thanks

Jim Meyering wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 04/05/2012 06:14 AM, Jari Aalto wrote:
>>>
>>> Please add verbose options to program touch(1):
>>>
>>>     -v, --verbose
>>>
>>> Similarly than what is found in cp(1), mv(1). Seing what files are being
>>> touched e.g. from scripts would be helpful:
>>>
>>>     touch ${optionverbose:+--verbose} <file pattern>
>>
>> Well files are always touched, or at a low level if the
>> timestamps don't need to be updated, this info isn't returned.
>>
>> Also to indicate as to whether files were created or not,
>> is problematic, I don't think that can be done atomically.
>
> Exactly.
> I'd rather not add any more --verbose options like this.
> In fact, I have been sorely tempted to remove the --verbose
> options from chown/chgrp and chmod: the options add complexity and
> the printed results are not reliable.

Also, touch is different from mv and cp.  For those two,
using --verbose can provide basic progress indicator when
the files are large, and for mv, when rename is not usable.

So I'm closing this.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.