GNU bug report logs - #11100
Racy code in copy.c

Previous Next

Full log

Message #26 received at 11100 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
To: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb <at> suse.de>, Philipp Thomas <pth <at> suse.de>,
	11100 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#11100: Racy code in copy.c
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:26:32 -0700

On 03/28/2012 09:07 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>        if ((use_stat
>> > -           ? stat (dst_name, &dst_sb)
>> > +           ? (stat (dst_name, &dst_sb) < 0 ? -1 :
>> > +	      (fd = open (dst_name, O_WRONLY)) < 0 ? -1 : 0)
>> >             : lstat (dst_name, &dst_sb))
>> >            != 0)
> At first glance, that might be reasonable: the additional open
> is incurred only after a failed stat.
> I'll look more closely in a week or two if no one else investigates.

Come to think of it, wouldn't it be more efficient to
do an open (dst_name, O_WRONLY | O_BINARY), and then
fstat the resulting fd, falling back on 'stat' only if the
open fails with errno == EACCES?   That should be
more efficient in the usual case, since it'd resolve
the file name fewer times in the usual case.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.