Subject: bug#11100: Racy code in copy.c

From: Philipp Thomas <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 15:20:59 +0200

* Jim Meyering ([email-masked]) [20120328 18:09]:

> At first glance, that might be reasonable: the additional open
> is incurred only after a failed stat.
> I'll look more closely in a week or two if no one else investigates.

Ping, it's been more than two weeks and I'm being bugged for a possible
solution and will refrain from making changes that aren't accepted upstream.

Philipp