GNU bug report logs - #11095
24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:19:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: patch

Found in version 24.0.94

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #85 received at 11095 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 11095 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94;
	hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:07:39 -0500
>>>> Seems to be working now (haven't tried before my recent changes, tho).
>>> By now, if you mean 111134, the unhighlighting is not working as
>>> expected.
>> Can you give a recipe, because "it works for me",
> How about a screenshot?

That can work as well, tho since it's not a display problem,
explanations work at least as well, usually better.
I never use hi-lock, so don't assume I know how it's expected to behave.

> Recipe-1:
>     Couple of C-x w h, followed by C-x w r.  Note the cursor position
>     and the choice offered.

I don't see anything wrong with the cursor position.  Please explain.

>     See screenshot.  Why is there no default offered

Don't know, should there be one?

>     and why even absurd candidates are offered?

Which absurd candidates are you talking about?

> Recipe-2:
>     Turn off font-lock-mode.
>     Couple of C-x w h and then try C-x w r, C-u C-x w r, try from menu.

What am I supposed to see when I try that?


        Stefan




This bug report was last modified 12 years and 221 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.