GNU bug report logs -
#11068
24.0.94; Face-remapped background does not extend to end of window
Previous Next
Reported by: Ivan Andrus <darthandrus <at> gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 21:21:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Found in version 24.0.94
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:14:37 +0200
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
> CC: darthandrus <at> gmail.com, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
> cyd <at> stupidchicken.com, 11068 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > The value says for which buffer positions to display the cursor
> > there. If the value is an integer number, the cursor is displayed
> > there when the buffer position is between N and N + n, where n is the
> > value of the property and N is the overlay-start position. If the
> > value is anything else and non-nil, the cursor is displayed there only
> > when point is at overlay-start.
>
> I see that now. It's not intuitive for me why I would want such
> behavior (and it apparently doesn't work for negative numbers) but I
> suppose it's needed by cua.
You need this if you want a tight control on cursor position for
several buffer positions.
> So the documentation is correct (once you
> understand how it works ;-) ) just that the following part
>
> it specifies the number of buffer's
> character positions associated with the overlay string;
>
> is misleading. Maybe "associated with" could become "affected by"?
I see no difference between "associated with" and "affected by", they
are both equally obscure. I think I wrote that when I myself didn't
have a clear notion of what that number means. I will try to come up
with a clearer wording, thanks for pointing this out.
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 54 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.