Subject: Re: bug#1102: Modification of patch

From: Glenn Morris <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:54:49 -0400

Phil Hagelberg wrote:

> add-hook should allow symbols since it's reasonable to refer to
> functions that haven't been defined yet.

Doesn't it therefore seem a bit pointless to check? There will always
be ways to shoot oneself in the foot. I imagine many functions don't
check the type of their arguments.