From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 15 01:40:14 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Mar 2012 05:40:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51386 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S83Q5-0000XD-W3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:40:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51750) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S83Q3-0000X4-Gc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:40:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S82wr-0007Zq-Rr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:10:05 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:35056) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S82wr-0007Z4-OH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:10:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49481) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S82wq-0005Wp-1I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:10:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S82wm-0007YX-UM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:09:59 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate05.web.de ([217.72.192.243]:35746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S82wm-0007YE-O7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:09:56 -0400 Received: from moweb001.kundenserver.de (moweb001.kundenserver.de [172.19.20.114]) by fmmailgate05.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FCD6B65A7F for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:09:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from dragon.dragon ([94.218.218.48]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0Mg7Zl-1Rvadj2gmT-00NT0L; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:09:54 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:16:08 +0100 Message-Id: <86haxq78br.fsf@web.de> From: Michael Heerdegen To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.0.94; Edebug: bindings shadowed by view-mode X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:RGnWT2YZg0j3IKiE4fMpr9B9BPiWqdnwU2/sHELm6xg 5I8zc5AtuKiym+z1AyBb9IpIwPYXbT2lE4DXlDIo3rNYUeJITW 4750SQLvxabe0SEYC/aEwfrDpCym7XyAoNgT+ItQxfSOhyIfmv QT6hZvn+0ki8om90u0sZWw81W1689hGq8fQ2xoZ3uJjNtIEcYL fa5jC5ieIpzymS/CPHPjV9QT32rWdHdIP0Dm0qyl6g= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) Hi, in emacs -Q, open an elisp file and enable `view-mode'. Now, instrument any defun in this buffer and eval something that causes that function to be called. You enter an edebug session, but nearly all edebug bindings won't work because they trigger `view-mode' bindings in this buffer instead. In GNU Emacs 24.0.94.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.2.3) of 2012-03-12 on zelenka, modified by Debian (emacs-snapshot package, version 2:20120312-1) Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11103901 Configured using: `configure '--build' 'i486-linux-gnu' '--host' 'i486-linux-gnu' '--prefix=/usr' '--sharedstatedir=/var/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/lib' '--localstatedir=/var' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-pop=yes' '--enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs-snapshot:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/24.0.94/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/24.0.94/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp' '--without-compress-info' '--with-crt-dir=/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/' '--with-x=yes' '--with-x-toolkit=gtk3' '--with-imagemagick=yes' 'build_alias=i486-linux-gnu' 'host_alias=i486-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-DDEBIAN -DSITELOAD_PURESIZE_EXTRA=5000 -g -O2'' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 15 06:05:42 2012 Received: (at 11018) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Mar 2012 10:05:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51593 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S87Yv-0007BJ-Nn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:05:41 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:40503) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S87Yq-0007B8-0o for 11018@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:05:36 -0400 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3V7l5m0j2Wz3hhY4; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:35:24 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: 32uE4SB1Lpltd1ipr3X9+Zcnn0pORZNfXx1P73F12x0= Received: from igel.home (ppp-93-104-138-214.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.138.214]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3V7l5m31SJz4KK5J; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:35:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id A3ED2CA29F; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:35:23 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#11018: 24.0.94; Edebug: bindings shadowed by view-mode References: <86haxq78br.fsf@web.de> X-Yow: I brought my BOWLING BALL - and some DRUGS!! Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:35:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86haxq78br.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:16:08 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11018 Cc: 11018@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Michael Heerdegen writes: > You enter an edebug session, but nearly all edebug bindings won't work > because they trigger `view-mode' bindings in this buffer instead. Every edebug binding is also available under the C-x X prefix. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 15 22:13:10 2012 Received: (at 11018) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Mar 2012 02:13:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52614 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S8MfF-0000zC-S9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:13:10 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate04.web.de ([217.72.192.242]:52050) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S8Mf3-0000ye-UI for 11018@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:13:08 -0400 Received: from moweb001.kundenserver.de (moweb001.kundenserver.de [172.19.20.114]) by fmmailgate04.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824AE73DBD54 for <11018@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:42:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from dragon.dragon ([94.218.218.48]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LqUKH-1Sm4ii1uNd-00dti7; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:42:46 +0100 From: Michael Heerdegen To: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: bug#11018: 24.0.94; Edebug: bindings shadowed by view-mode References: <86haxq78br.fsf@web.de> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:48:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:35:23 +0100") Message-ID: <86k42luxh1.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:iGuHIdoUyt8N4XdHa00F7Dk3iWVyw16MM4hP6c4fAt1 mP97femrnXE3FxL1rai7awO2SP4MAYzCDKSGtOHZH0qzpVl/Q+ IQqZ/E/pcgMrPhrvx5docJfOjlEM2N1N9i/eKGB35W9zak07ei +azSti+syzEfOp0D08pgV27fXCRFiO+4ghPrMtpIkO8e6xggti LQzeyDU6soCQRg+TiMTP5D8TVWGZY0N6QWEM8CfKh8= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11018 Cc: 11018@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Andreas Schwab writes: > > You enter an edebug session, but nearly all edebug bindings won't work > > because they trigger `view-mode' bindings in this buffer instead. > > Every edebug binding is also available under the C-x X prefix. Yes, that's `global-edebug-prefix'. In the header, there is a typo, here: ;; If you wish to change the default edebug global command prefix, change: ;; (setq edebug-global-prefix "\C-xX") ------------- There is no binding for `edebug-next-mode' (i.e. n in `edebug-mode-map') in `global-edebug-map' (why?). I would have to type C-x X SPC C-x X SPC ... to step through the code - a pain in the ass. I don't have an elegant solution for this problem. It is not a problem especially with `view-mode'. All minor mode bindings shadow `edebug-mode-map' which is used as local map. If there was an `edebug-mode-hook', then the user could deactivate interfering minor modes there. Michael. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 15 23:17:55 2012 Received: (at 11018) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Mar 2012 03:17:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52669 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S8Nfu-0003J9-P9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:17:55 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:60053) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S8Nfi-0003Is-PL for 11018@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:17:52 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAKU/KE9soXdS/2dsb2JhbACBX5x7eYhwnhmGGQSbGYQJ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="168279070" Received: from 108-161-119-82.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([108.161.119.82]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 15 Mar 2012 22:47:31 -0400 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 31942660E0; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:47:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#11018: 24.0.94; Edebug: bindings shadowed by view-mode Message-ID: References: <86haxq78br.fsf@web.de> <86k42luxh1.fsf@web.de> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:47:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86k42luxh1.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:48:58 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11018 Cc: Andreas Schwab , 11018@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > I don't have an elegant solution for this problem. It is not a problem > especially with `view-mode'. All minor mode bindings shadow > `edebug-mode-map' which is used as local map. Maybe it should be installed with higher precedence, by virtue of being transient. > If there was an `edebug-mode-hook', then the user could deactivate > interfering minor modes there. That could be an alternative, but then you'd probably want to re-enable it when leaving edebug mode, which would enable&disable it very often and could be difficult to implement efficiently. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 16 00:12:13 2012 Received: (at 11018) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Mar 2012 04:12:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52703 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S8OWS-0004Xv-Sb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:12:13 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:64493) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S8OWQ-0004Xo-QM for 11018@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:12:11 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAKU/KE9soXdS/2dsb2JhbACBX5x7eYhwnhmGGQSbGYQJ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="168288647" Received: from 108-161-119-82.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([108.161.119.82]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 15 Mar 2012 23:41:59 -0400 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B23DE660E0; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:41:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#11018: 24.0.94; Edebug: bindings shadowed by view-mode Message-ID: References: <86haxq78br.fsf@web.de> <86k42luxh1.fsf@web.de> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:41:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:47:31 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11018 Cc: Andreas Schwab , 11018@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > That could be an alternative, but then you'd probably want to re-enable > it when leaving edebug mode, which would enable&disable it very often > and could be difficult to implement efficiently. ^^^^^^^^^^^ reliably Sorry, wasn't thinking right, Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 03:56:35 2019 Received: (at 11018) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 07:56:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53750 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM64p-0004sH-4W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 03:56:35 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:42216) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM64m-0004s7-TR for 11018@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 03:56:33 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM64h-0004dG-W9; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 09:56:30 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#11018: 24.0.94; Edebug: bindings shadowed by view-mode References: <86haxq78br.fsf@web.de> <86k42luxh1.fsf@web.de> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 09:56:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:47:31 -0400") Message-ID: <877e4zg89g.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I don't have an elegant solution for this problem. It is not a problem >> especially with `view-mode'. All minor mode bindings shadow >> `edebug-mode-map' which is used as local map. > > Maybe it s [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11018 Cc: Michael Heerdegen , Andreas Schwab , 11018@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Monnier writes: >> I don't have an elegant solution for this problem. It is not a problem >> especially with `view-mode'. All minor mode bindings shadow >> `edebug-mode-map' which is used as local map. > > Maybe it should be installed with higher precedence, by virtue of > being transient. That sounds like a good idea. How is the precedence of minor mode maps determined? Hm... I see that minor-mode-overriding-map-alist exists -- should edebug put its keymap there instead of minor-mode-map-alist? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 04:27:11 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 08:27:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53755 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM6YR-0007m3-KJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 04:27:11 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:42670) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM6YO-0007ls-T7 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 04:27:09 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM6YK-0004tx-IH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:27:06 +0200 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:27:04 +0200 Message-Id: <875zkjg6uf.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #15451 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: forcemerge 15451 11018 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) forcemerge 15451 11018 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 10:50:35 2019 Received: (at 11018) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 14:50:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55098 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMCXQ-0002V1-Qp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:50:33 -0400 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:21760) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMCXN-0002Um-G8 for 11018@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:50:31 -0400 Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 912011005F7; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:50:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CC599100506; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:50:21 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1571583021; bh=Eae40di6gR9tEXHvVOm0VppRVKvvhkSsBTusaDBWsO4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=bYEmOzOqoJYJm7p6UH36Pg2rCzzzVQ5Dz7HAffxXjOAVQBm3Wqwe5wDwxa4bXG/Iv tvCkPo6OxnnMrdGFuXs4eO/aTudVDTkYGJopDeY16N73ZiBY2NhtcUUt3zxQz0iLC9 t8FKRU5ZHrqY4XWTisLXN9qOwlOPtRyowzD8ivZ6QMxrKAS7QRVJlHx8I+PpxGe2Hn ouOXXQMAE+XhoXgetVwsWGQcyIBw282yihXe8wMtiDdDWw5SKgp4R3htRxIMU5/G6l PdxdGKtiyShRa6k9vJnth+0VUtkQiVsXYNfRWnVjEjQn+18pxGCsaRlKnx/L+cu7jL gch6DH2FVLkPQ== Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.15.203]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A9AD1204BF; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:50:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#11018: 24.0.94; Edebug: bindings shadowed by view-mode Message-ID: References: <86haxq78br.fsf@web.de> <86k42luxh1.fsf@web.de> <877e4zg89g.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:50:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877e4zg89g.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 09:56:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL -0.039 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11018 Cc: Michael Heerdegen , Andreas Schwab , 11018@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >>> I don't have an elegant solution for this problem. It is not a problem >>> especially with `view-mode'. All minor mode bindings shadow >>> `edebug-mode-map' which is used as local map. >> >> Maybe it should be installed with higher precedence, by virtue of >> being transient. > > That sounds like a good idea. How is the precedence of minor mode maps > determined? > > Hm... I see that minor-mode-overriding-map-alist exists -- should > edebug put its keymap there instead of minor-mode-map-alist? That might work, Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 11:08:08 2019 Received: (at 11018) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 15:08:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55111 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMCoR-0002xN-Us for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:08:08 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:49886) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMCoQ-0002x9-6r; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:08:06 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMCoK-0000Ea-IP; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:08:02 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#11018: 24.0.94; Edebug: bindings shadowed by view-mode References: <86haxq78br.fsf@web.de> <86k42luxh1.fsf@web.de> <877e4zg89g.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:08:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:50:20 -0400") Message-ID: <87lftfe9pr.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Hm... I see that minor-mode-overriding-map-alist exists -- should >> edebug put its keymap there instead of minor-mode-map-alist? > > That might work, Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 11018 Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 15451@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab , 11018@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Monnier writes: >> Hm... I see that minor-mode-overriding-map-alist exists -- should >> edebug put its keymap there instead of minor-mode-map-alist? > > That might work, That seemed to work -- I bound it in edebug--recursive-edit, so it shouldn't mess anything up after exiting edebug. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 11:08:14 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 15:08:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55116 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMCoY-0002xn-G1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:08:14 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:49900) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMCoV-0002xe-Vi for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:08:12 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMCoQ-0000Eo-6n for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:08:11 +0200 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:08:05 +0200 Message-Id: <87k18ze9pm.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #15451 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 15451 fixed close 15451 27.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 15451 fixed close 15451 27.1 quit From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:16:21 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator