GNU bug report logs -
#11013
gnus-use-full-window incompletely implemented
Previous Next
Reported by: sds <at> gnu.org
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:42:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 5.13
Done: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 11013 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 11013 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#11013
; Package
gnus
.
(Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
sds <at> gnu.org
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bugs <at> gnus.org
.
(Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I just discovered gnus-use-full-window=nil and I am totally thrilled
with a full-screen Emacs frame which gnus does not hijack.
However, a couple of nits have to be picked:
1. gnus-bug did delete all the other windows and hijack the frame.
my mail-user-agent is gnus-user-agent.
2. I can have two *Summary* buffers side but only one *Article* buffer,
and as soon as I hit enter in one *Summary* buffer, the window with the
other *Summary* buffer disappears. I wish I could read two newsgroups
side by side!
Thanks!
Gnus v5.13
GNU Emacs 24.0.94.4 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars)
of 2012-03-12 on t520sds
200 news.gmane.org InterNetNews NNRP server INN 2.5.1 ready (posting ok)
101 Capability list:
VERSION 2
IMPLEMENTATION INN 2.5.1
AUTHINFO USER
HDR
LIST ACTIVE ACTIVE.TIMES DISTRIB.PATS HEADERS NEWSGROUPS OVERVIEW.FMT
OVER
POST
READER
STARTTLS
.
382 Begin TLS negotiation now
101 Capability list:
VERSION 2
IMPLEMENTATION INN 2.5.1
AUTHINFO USER
HDR
LIST ACTIVE ACTIVE.TIMES DISTRIB.PATS HEADERS NEWSGROUPS OVERVIEW.FMT
OVER
POST
READER
.
--
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) X 11.0.11004000
http://www.childpsy.net/ http://honestreporting.com http://pmw.org.il
http://jihadwatch.org http://americancensorship.org http://dhimmi.com
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Information forwarded
to
bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#11013
; Package
gnus
.
(Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:49:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 11013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Sam Steingold <sds <at> gnu.org> writes:
> I just discovered gnus-use-full-window=nil and I am totally thrilled
> with a full-screen Emacs frame which gnus does not hijack.
> However, a couple of nits have to be picked:
>
> 1. gnus-bug did delete all the other windows and hijack the frame.
> my mail-user-agent is gnus-user-agent.
I think I've fixed this now in No Gnus.
> 2. I can have two *Summary* buffers side but only one *Article* buffer,
> and as soon as I hit enter in one *Summary* buffer, the window with the
> other *Summary* buffer disappears. I wish I could read two newsgroups
> side by side!
Do you have `gnus-single-article-buffer' set?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Information forwarded
to
bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#11013
; Package
gnus
.
(Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:41:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 11013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <ynefv <at> tahf.bet> [2012-03-14 16:17:54 +0100]:
>
> Sam Steingold <sds <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> I just discovered gnus-use-full-window=nil and I am totally thrilled
>> with a full-screen Emacs frame which gnus does not hijack.
>> However, a couple of nits have to be picked:
>>
>> 1. gnus-bug did delete all the other windows and hijack the frame.
>> my mail-user-agent is gnus-user-agent.
>
> I think I've fixed this now in No Gnus.
good!
gnus-version
==> "Gnus v5.13"
which one is that?
emacs-version
"24.0.94.4"
>> 2. I can have two *Summary* buffers side but only one *Article* buffer,
>> and as soon as I hit enter in one *Summary* buffer, the window with the
>> other *Summary* buffer disappears. I wish I could read two newsgroups
>> side by side!
>
> Do you have `gnus-single-article-buffer' set?
gnus-single-article-buffer
nil
I was wrong, sorry. The buffer is there, but it is not displayed.
Here is what happens.
I have a maximized emacs frame.
I split it side-by-side (C-x 3).
I make the left window show *Summary group1*
and the right window show *Summary group2*.
I hit RET in the left window.
EXPECTED behavior: left window is split below (like C-x 2) and the
*Article group1* is shown below the *Summary group1*. The right window
still shows *Summary group2*.
ACTUAL behavior: *Summary group2* disappears and the whole frame is
hijacked by *Summary group1* and *Article group1*.
--
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) X 11.0.11004000
http://www.childpsy.net/ http://memri.org http://www.memritv.org
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://thereligionofpeace.com
Oh Lord, give me the source code of the Universe and a good debugger!
Information forwarded
to
bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#11013
; Package
gnus
.
(Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 11013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Sam Steingold <sds <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> I think I've fixed this now in No Gnus.
>
> good!
> gnus-version
> ==> "Gnus v5.13"
> which one is that?
>
> emacs-version
> "24.0.94.4"
For all intensive purposes, No Gnus is 5.13.
> I was wrong, sorry. The buffer is there, but it is not displayed.
>
> Here is what happens.
> I have a maximized emacs frame.
> I split it side-by-side (C-x 3).
> I make the left window show *Summary group1*
> and the right window show *Summary group2*.
> I hit RET in the left window.
>
> EXPECTED behavior: left window is split below (like C-x 2) and the
> *Article group1* is shown below the *Summary group1*. The right window
> still shows *Summary group2*.
>
> ACTUAL behavior: *Summary group2* disappears and the whole frame is
> hijacked by *Summary group1* and *Article group1*.
I see. Looking at the code, that does seem to be almost the intended
outcome.
The `gnus-use-full-window' logic is "leave non-Gnus buffers be, but use
the Gnus buffers as normal". That is, it computes the area of the Gnus
windows, and then arranges the buffers inside that area, instead of the
default, which is to use the entire frame.
So Gnus just doesn't support having two summary/article buffer pairs
side by side in a frame.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Information forwarded
to
bugs <at> gnus.org
:
bug#11013
; Package
gnus
.
(Fri, 23 Mar 2012 05:20:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 11013 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <ynefv <at> tahf.bet> [2012-03-22 22:42:32 +0100]:
>
> So Gnus just doesn't support having two summary/article buffer pairs
> side by side in a frame.
that's too bad. please consider this an RFE.
e.g., when I read related groups, I want to see related discussions next
to each other.
--
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) X 11.0.11004000
http://www.childpsy.net/ http://ffii.org http://pmw.org.il
http://camera.org http://thereligionofpeace.com http://honestreporting.com
War has never solved anything - except for ending Slavery, Nazism, Communism.
Reply sent
to
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:55:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
sds <at> gnu.org
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:55:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 11013-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Sam Steingold <sds <at> gnu.org> writes:
> that's too bad. please consider this an RFE.
> e.g., when I read related groups, I want to see related discussions next
> to each other.
The way the Gnus window control mechanisms work, I think the complexity
involved doesn't warrant the added functionality. Especially since you
can get the desired look by just using two frames side-by-side instead.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Message #23 received at 11013-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <ynefv <at> tahf.bet> [2012-04-10 19:52:53 +0200]:
>
> can get the desired look by just using two frames side-by-side instead.
this is very different: a maximized frame has properties which cannot be
gained from two frames side-by-side.
--
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) X 11.0.11004000
http://www.childpsy.net/ http://thereligionofpeace.com http://pmw.org.il
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://www.memritv.org
Computers are like air conditioners: they don't work with open windows!
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 09 May 2012 11:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 101 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.