From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 12 02:55:25 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2012 06:55:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45930 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6zA9-0004Hc-6M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:55:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6zA2-0004HI-Ik for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:55:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6yh7-00066h-0X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:25:25 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:35646) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6yh6-00066a-Ql for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:25:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38541) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6yh5-0005cT-5W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:25:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6yh2-00066J-SI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:25:18 -0400 Received: from caiajhbdcbhh.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.177]:52365 helo=homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6yh2-000667-FM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:25:16 -0400 Received: from homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D28578071 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 23:25:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=jidanni.org ; b=fC9Tzijcrqx9xzfCbWUyTjskyGB6Flv8Mo5Q9U2nrFoa3xTaXgGcg+V/d/kE 14q9hX8jnIr0iHm58BKDvNcwM3Orh+S0yt7iqht1Wk0smwNcF5LlF3bs1NrHbvQY wCtkHPn3eBHTIeALMDZAQv1cinTmbfFDvXZLgBL0DUar6ak= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= jidanni.org; bh=PB7fBF3mhsiETnGcsZL1WGAsFY4=; b=CizFhtX7bON5bMNM 9JHoLURUpp5GEuk6AW3+xTQVf6mpfLe2YhEN5xaUL34sxl4c+68i4Rtfxbk08BPH WTiVntsPWLKuEJb7XMTY8j9C7EGhYD82cW82apeVRmYbuu5ZcFdHpn2df2ufp9Vv Q3yA9X/l8Hkqj3m3YZgdLORRteE= Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-19-122.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.19.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E3D4578059 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 23:25:12 -0700 (PDT) From: jidanni@jidanni.org To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: delete-other-windows should say why nothing happens sometimes Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:15:10 +0800 Message-ID: <8762eaz6oh.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Cc: rms@gnu.org C-x 1 runs the command delete-other-windows If not by default, then there should be some option settable to make it say "There are no other windows, HOLMES", if that indeed is the case. Otherwise the user scratches his/her head wondering why nothing happens. Same with C-x o runs the command other-window. You might think it is OK for nothing to happen. But some of us think an explanation is due! Did I submit this bug before? Yes. So please reconsider. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 17 19:36:35 2019 Received: (at 10999) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Aug 2019 23:36:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57119 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hz8FO-0007aY-UU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:36:35 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:57354) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hz8FN-0007aP-Ty for 10999@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:36:34 -0400 Received: from [50.225.213.182] (helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hz8FJ-00055O-Bg; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 01:36:32 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: jidanni@jidanni.org Subject: Re: bug#10999: delete-other-windows should say why nothing happens sometimes References: <8762eaz6oh.fsf@jidanni.org> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 16:36:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <8762eaz6oh.fsf@jidanni.org> (jidanni@jidanni.org's message of "Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:15:10 +0800") Message-ID: <87k1bb8iv9.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > C-x 1 runs the command delete-other-windows > > If not by default, then there should be some option settable to make it say > "There are no other windows, HOLMES", > if that indeed is the case. > > [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10999 Cc: 10999@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > C-x 1 runs the command delete-other-windows > > If not by default, then there should be some option settable to make it say > "There are no other windows, HOLMES", > if that indeed is the case. > > Otherwise the user scratches his/her head wondering why nothing happens. I've now done this on the trunk. > Same with > > C-x o runs the command other-window. > > You might think it is OK for nothing to happen. And this, too. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 17 19:36:42 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Aug 2019 23:36:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57122 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hz8FW-0007az-9M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:36:42 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:57368) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hz8FU-0007ao-9o for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:36:40 -0400 Received: from [50.225.213.182] (helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hz8FR-00055a-BF for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 01:36:39 +0200 Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 16:36:35 -0700 Message-Id: <87imqv8iv0.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #10999 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 10999 fixed close 10999 27.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 10999 fixed close 10999 27.1 quit From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:32:05 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator