GNU bug report logs - #10983
ready for a release?

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>

Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:49:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#10983: closed (ready for a release?)
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:20:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:18:19 +0000
with message-id <4F5A496B.8090000 <at> draigBrady.com>
and subject line Re: bug#10983: ready for a release?
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #10983,
regarding ready for a release?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
10983: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10983
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: ready for a release?
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:47:29 +0100
There are more than enough new features to justify a release,
not to mention the three bug fixes.

Anything worth waiting for?


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
To: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>, Coreutils <coreutils <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 10983-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10983: ready for a release?
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:18:19 +0000
tag 10983 notabug

On 03/09/2012 05:47 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> There are more than enough new features to justify a release,
> not to mention the three bug fixes.
> 
> Anything worth waiting for?

Well the dirname multi argument processing to
complement the basename seems simple and
worth waiting for.

Also adding back the functionality to
allow split to create an arbitrary amount
of files is done and also seems unlikely
to cause issues.

Also there is a gnulib tweak to support
building timeout as a static binary.

I hope to push these this evening.

cheers,
Pádraig.


This bug report was last modified 13 years and 70 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.