GNU bug report logs - #10976
bugreport tail (GNU coreutils) 5.97

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Streit Andreas <streit <at> heidenhain.de>

Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:55:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Done: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#10976: closed (bugreport tail (GNU coreutils) 5.97)
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:58:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:56:22 -0700
with message-id <4F5A4446.2090001 <at> redhat.com>
and subject line Re: bug#10976: bugreport tail (GNU coreutils) 5.97
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #10976,
regarding bugreport tail (GNU coreutils) 5.97
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
10976: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10976
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Streit Andreas <streit <at> heidenhain.de>
To: "bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org" <bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bugreport tail (GNU coreutils) 5.97
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 08:47:08 +0100
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,

i just tried the following command with more than one file:

tail -50 files_*.txt
i get an error:
tail: invalid option -- 5
Try `tail --help' for more information.

If i try the same command with only one file it works properly:
tail -50 files.txt

If i try the modified command with more than one file it works properly:
tail --lines=50 files_*.txt


regards

Andreas



------------------------------------------------------------
mailto:streit <at> heidenhain.de
tel.: +49 8669 31 2789
fax: +49 8669 32 2789
------------------------------------------------------------

DR. JOHANNES HEIDENHAIN GmbH
Dr.-Johannes-Heidenhain-Str. 5
83301 Traunreut, Deutschland
http://www.heidenhain.de/


[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]
[Message part 5 (text/plain, inline)]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registergericht: Traunstein / Registry Court: HRB 275 - Sitz / Head Office: Traunreut
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender / Chairman of Supervisory Board: Rainer Burkhard
Geschäftsführung / Management Board: Thomas Sesselmann (Vorsitzender / Chairman),
Michael Grimm, Matthias Fauser, Sebastian Tondorf

E-Mail Haftungsausschluss / E-Mail Disclaimer <http://www.heidenhain.de/disclaimer>
[Message part 6 (text/html, inline)]
[Message part 7 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: Streit Andreas <streit <at> heidenhain.de>
Cc: 10976-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10976: bugreport tail (GNU coreutils) 5.97
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:56:22 -0700
[Message part 8 (text/plain, inline)]
tag 10976 notabug
thanks

On 03/09/2012 12:47 AM, Streit Andreas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> i just tried the following command with more than one file:
> 
> tail -50 files_*.txt
> i get an error:
> tail: invalid option -- 5
> Try `tail --help' for more information.

Thanks for the report.  However, this behavior is intentional.  POSIX
says that you should be using -n50, and that while implementations may
support -50 as an extension, it is not a requirement.  Your usage is
non-portable, and coreutils is alerting you to the fact.

Per 'info tail',

>>    For compatibility `tail' also supports an obsolete usage `tail
>> -[COUNT][bcl][f] [FILE]', which is recognized only if it does not
>> conflict with the usage described above.  This obsolete form uses
>> exactly one option and at most one file.  In the option, COUNT is an
>> optional decimal number optionally followed by a size letter (`b', `c',
>> `l') to mean count by 512-byte blocks, bytes, or lines, optionally
>> followed by `f' which has the same meaning as `-f'.
>> 
>>    On older systems, the leading `-' can be replaced by `+' in the
>> obsolete option syntax with the same meaning as in counts, and obsolete
>> usage overrides normal usage when the two conflict.  This obsolete
>> behavior can be enabled or disabled with the `_POSIX2_VERSION'
>> environment variable (*note Standards conformance::).

> If i try the same command with only one file it works properly:
> tail -50 files.txt

Yes, this is an example of the obsolete usage.

> 
> If i try the modified command with more than one file it works properly:
> tail --lines=50 files_*.txt

Yes, this is the preferred style (simplified to -n).

Since the behavior is intentional, I'm closing this as not a bug.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake <at> redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 13 years and 72 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.