GNU bug report logs - #10974
guile-user@gnu.org

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Alexei Matveev <alexei.matveev <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:51:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #27 received at 10974 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: 10974 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Alexei Matveev <alexei.matveev <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#10974: guile-user <at> gnu.org
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:17:54 +0200

On Tue 03 Jul 2012 00:35, ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com> skribis:
>
>> Would this be "fixed" if we changed these to be implemented as inline
>> functions?
>
> In some way, though their address could still not be taken.

Sorry to be obtuse, but with our inline functions, we also residualize a
concrete instantiation (via the inline.c madness).  Does that not work?

A
-- 
http://wingolog.org/
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 19 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.