Subject: bug#10974: [email-masked]

From: [email-masked] (Ludovic Courtès)
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:09:27 +0200

Hi,

Andy Wingo <[email-masked]> skribis:

> On Tue 03 Jul 2012 00:35, [email-masked] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo <[email-masked]> skribis:
>>
>>> Would this be "fixed" if we changed these to be implemented as inline
>>> functions?
>>
>> In some way, though their address could still not be taken.
>
> Sorry to be obtuse, but with our inline functions, we also residualize a
> concrete instantiation (via the inline.c madness).  Does that not work?

Yes, right, so we could just inline them all.

Ludo’.