From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:21:47 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#10900 <10900@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#10900 <10900@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [cp] "cp -r a a" gives error message but copies anyway Reply-To: bug#10900 <10900@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:21:47 +0000 retitle 10900 [cp] "cp -r a a" gives error message but copies anyway reassign 10900 coreutils submitter 10900 subratkumar severity 10900 normal tag 10900 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 27 14:13:21 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2012 19:13:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60137 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S260e-0005xV-Cs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:13:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39106) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S247g-00031y-8o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:12:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S244p-0000Lq-Vn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:09:35 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:41420) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S244p-0000Lf-Si for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:09:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50511) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S244j-0000rV-OY for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:09:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S244d-0000J6-QZ for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:09:25 -0500 Received: from gesmail.globaledgesoft.com ([119.82.106.22]:53598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S244d-0000I9-G2 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:09:19 -0500 Received: from [172.16.5.114] (unknown [172.16.5.114]) by gesmail.globaledgesoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B605880E3 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:05:56 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <4F4BAEF7.7020006@globaledgesoft.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:57:35 +0530 From: subratkumar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: Regarding the observed bugs in cp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: 1. cp -r a a cp: cannot copy a directory, `a', into itself, `a/a' as per this the it is not allowable to copy a into a.But its doing 2. cp -s b ../ cp: `../b': can make relative symbolic links only in current directory its a symbolic link and should not restrict to current directory. i have checked it in kernel 2.6.21.5 and 3.04 .Please check it and let me know if its corrected or not. Thanks and Regards Subrat Kumar Ojha [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [208.118.235.92 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:13:19 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: 1. cp -r a a cp: cannot copy a directory, `a', into itself, `a/a' as per this the it is not allowable to copy a into a.But its doing 2. cp -s b ../ cp: `../b': can make relative symbolic links only in current directory its a symbolic link and should not restrict to current directory. i have checked it in kernel 2.6.21.5 and 3.04 .Please check it and let me know if its corrected or not. Thanks and Regards Subrat Kumar Ojha [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [208.118.235.92 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1. cp -r a a cp: cannot copy a directory, `a', into itself, `a/a' as per this the it is not allowable to copy a into a.But its doing 2. cp -s b ../ cp: `../b': can make relative symbolic links only in current directory its a symbolic link and should not restrict to current directory. i have checked it in kernel 2.6.21.5 and 3.04 .Please check it and let me know if its corrected or not. Thanks and Regards Subrat Kumar Ojha From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 30 04:09:47 2012 Received: (at 10900) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2012 08:09:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57037 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6zow-0004yk-GQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:09:46 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:55503) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T6zou-0004yc-6t for 10900@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:09:45 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4743C20CA4; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:08:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.215]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:08:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:cc:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=hmdErOoCCiWHDEFdrMGdaRdsQMQ=; b=IrVeKX1ncFvMKyhenjxguZbCK9/0 YVyS+GRgToOyKlhUp1eainmVLds/nRY84oLpj4yIKN+gEwrA8sPsNVs3bpchc+6e p5FJBxtLcVyLRZQ4mogW2c2ZyGkFUf9N75mu4vsBDyo3suCwAdOvp4FPY4kIigMi TLv9B0F124HUIM0= Received: by web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1EA594C0212; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:08:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1346314115.7192.140661121424997.5126D631@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 4f8wqTQDyvBakaWUXDnLt84RGrySyGRUkRctEzzd1lN6 1346314115 From: era eriksson To: subratkumar.o@globaledgesoft.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Subject: Clarification re: Regarding the observed bugs in cp Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:08:35 +0300 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10900 Cc: 10900@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) I stumbled across your recent bug report for cp http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10900 and I was wondering if you could follow up with a bit of additional information. What did you expect to happen, and what should be fixed in order for cp to behave like you expect? Thanks for your bug report! I am but a mere bystander, but I appreciate your effort. /* era */ -- If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 30 04:26:35 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2012 08:26:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57081 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T705B-0006Ev-9W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:26:34 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:49878) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T7058-0006Em-DT for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:26:31 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3736A20E44 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:25:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.215]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:25:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=yUfJ133wNLWaQHb3TYv5eEzNLWg=; b=j7sht89VPoQ6n8cpm1RMl2G9jUfv pyYxPKkUJYRA2EhWATPUZkMDzmXVaYraeUOnp4iT/Gkm19pn1GV9/9WBYMVnH5em dtt9dHA2MbMQNi6dQGY96zzg7+8L4/TWcuBS/fCNpVHzh8/uSJYntoGdubhVMq/r 09JnsDnZj5MukA4= Received: by web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id DE71E4C0212; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:25:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1346315120.10703.140661121426477.2AFE53D5@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 4nXWxMLkgjDvdikikEcOj9pbHgqp6intQUQ9wPX89h/O 1346315120 From: era eriksson To: control@debbugs.gnu.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Subject: Still more bug maintenance Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:25:20 +0300 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) tags 6970 + moreinfo tags 7000 + notabug tags 7731 + moreinfo tags 8294 + moreinfo close 8294 tags 10136 + notabug close 10136 tags 10456 + moreinfo tags 10799 + moreinfo tags 10900 + moreinfo tags 11316 + moreinfo tags 11696 + notabug close 11696 tags 11949 + moreinfo thanks /* era */ -- If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 31 00:40:33 2012 Received: (at 10900) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2012 04:40:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58814 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T7J1y-0005P2-DK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:40:31 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:41911) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T7J1p-0005On-Ec for 10900@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:40:23 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DD62148A; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:39:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.215]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:39:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:cc:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=Ag2I0KK0YteB8jCQ4bQV6TxPJME=; b=oDeZs 1+iXz0GU1aIeK8+ji8Pkj5w/YvhWPU7Vf8JrOn+gABVdC8U7MvfpBvC/pbUk89Gu D7zrHGh2quFMrBoIH8osHsork309Vm5RGAooVc7B5UmjAe+JAYJ1wc5rsvRFPGm4 sphQIcLnWjcCCI5YZm9Ld3Spfh/QGgg6a9RVbE= Received: by web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 0C63F4C02AD; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:39:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <503F72E3.8010000@globaledgesoft.com> X-Sasl-Enc: c9illXvWx1NMoxjqcXI+L8d9q9Fvjq2ftxtHvLRHX2Fj 1346387946 From: era eriksson To: 10900@debbugs.gnu.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_----------=_1346387946107871"; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Subject: Re: Clarification re: Regarding the observed bugs in cp Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 07:39:06 +0300 X-Delivered-To: iki@eeera.imap.cc In-Reply-To: <1346314115.7192.140661121424997.5126D631@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1346314115.7192.140661121424997.5126D631@webmail.messagingengine.com> Received: ARRAY(0x7f79ef442fb0) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10900 Cc: subratkumar X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_----------=_1346387946107871 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_1346387946107870"; charset="utf-8" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_----------=_1346387946107870 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Forwarding a replyI only received in private. Please keep the Cc: on any followups. From: subratkumar To: era eriksson Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:04 On Thursday 30 August 2012 01:38 PM, era eriksson wrote: I stumbled across your recent bug report for cp [1]http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10900 and I was wondering if you could follow up with a bit of additional information. What did you expect to happen, and what should be fixed in order for cp to behave like you expect? Thanks for your bug report! I am but a mere bystander, but I appreciate your effort. /* era */ I expected : 1.cp -r dir1 dir1 (should not copy dir1 inside dir1) ,it was coming with an erro r message but it was copying inside dir1 ,please check it inside dir1. 2.cp -s file1 ../dir1/ (symlinking out side the current directory should be allo wed) but it came with error symlink restricted to current directory. Please have a look. Let me know about these. -- ------------------------------------------------ Thanks & regards Subrat Kumar Ojha PMG, Global Edge Software Ltd. Mob - +91 - 9620262307 References 1. http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10900 --_----------=_1346387946107870 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html
Forwarding a replyI only received in private.  Please keep the Cc: on any followups.
From: subratkumar <subratkumar.o@globaledgesoft.com>
To: era eriksson <era@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:04
On Thursday 30 August 2012 01:38 PM, era eriksson wrote:
I stumbled across your recent bug report for cp
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10900
and I was wondering if you could follow up with a bit of additional
information.  What did you expect to happen, and what should be fixed in
order for cp to behave like you expect?

Thanks for your bug report!  I am but a mere bystander, but I appreciate
your effort.

/* era */


I expected :
1.cp -r dir1 dir1 (should not copy dir1 inside dir1) ,it was coming with an error message but it was copying inside dir1 ,please check it inside dir1.
2.cp -s file1 ../dir1/ (symlinking out side the current directory should be allowed) but it came with error symlink restricted to  current directory.
Please have a look. Let me know about these.

--

------------------------------------------------
Thanks & regards
Subrat Kumar Ojha
PMG, Global Edge Software Ltd.
Mob - +91 - 9620262307
 
--_----------=_1346387946107870-- --_----------=_1346387946107871 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="subratkumar_o.vcf" Content-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; name="subratkumar_o.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQKZm46U3VicmF0IEt1bWFyIE9qaGEKbjpPamhhO1N1YnJh dCBLdW1hcgp0ZWw7d29yazpQTUcKdGVsO2NlbGw6KzkxLTk2MjAyNjIzMDcK dmVyc2lvbjoyLjEKZW5kOnZjYXJkCgo= --_----------=_1346387946107871-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 02 10:13:18 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2012 14:13:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34581 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T8AvO-0003H2-42 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:13:18 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:35306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T8AvM-0003Gu-9X for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:13:17 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id D516C202E2 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 10:11:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.216]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:11:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=gw5LDRQxhMZoP47B9JkG5yZ2AFU=; b=qqHbj+NtQ+9rrTjlfjckjb4xztDk 54lRhoBmMAErmXihBugcAttmM978s8wD3V+Lshz1G85GNSKfbXxrMqcS1lLx0fBY /BdZImC6Td7oMwk84VQ2M1lov6q0mJ9jtEDmMjWpmNO7nUT3fcX94IR+fH4UfTt4 L8fNhhPckDBEeys= Received: by web6.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id A7019683624; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 10:11:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1346595108.7862.140661122654733.4D7A1B7C@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: mdYDv9Aj7pgEuA4hXgIt5OAJMH26G9WtjImpoygwvFLp 1346595108 From: era eriksson To: control@debbugs.gnu.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Subject: Manage 10900 Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 17:11:48 +0300 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) tags 10900 - moreinfo clone 10900 -1 retitle -1 [cp] "cp -s" cannot create symbolic link in parent dir retitle 10900 [cp] "cp -r a a" gives error message but copies anyway thanks /* era */ -- If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 15 12:16:05 2018 Received: (at 10900) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2018 16:16:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51016 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC5XJ-0004M9-2P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:16:05 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:36966) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC5XG-0004Eo-BA; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:16:02 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id u6-v6so6800298plz.4; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:16:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l9mE8OnLTo3qLaALgli3AXr6QRBZaEt/mcggzy8KZeg=; b=hi8iffWvuQxWGNH5JAYvbd3LMxeTDWZMb0HhM8tuCqjScH/6yiGuknUJ8ph+Fer7DW y3uECzL6dTIO5NbdnHijuzNPYg7FXV3vr7QYa1UN0TrjKRDq2kQLwldqNkLK42rzXPme wl4CJFRBrCjjMYZsFyLMQ2EyogQRWpX1ZryTsmUSfEeKCdGOe610nL1thpCew887UUpB TMrSIqUZAk2ljknzzuQ4v9qLP42alvBY0QXZlfLPI7HwtyhtXh3bcknz8+oKcAoKSMr1 WfOvjKOM1ZUQoZRqXr4G4ZOMlcFL3bwWbDyUfgNyc3RNvpJfbmbIbFwA7T29bK+nDL1n Zgog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=l9mE8OnLTo3qLaALgli3AXr6QRBZaEt/mcggzy8KZeg=; b=CRXzshrdGPCMdWxj6W5N4zxsVB45lEbwz37ivW0uY2LMDlhh+jbYqqGD5mkv1/MOC0 8DJNPmjcjZOEGTmzvJp7v3yKQTWcsCL2RxMWXNmaWPlEi2/okUFVjmg7IQRJjgjkMy0P ysTfAVeQ5ZPN9rnlVqbzJy+48uMuwaULVUNjzIGspjk5sWabj5zQNUH02EE92jCTC+gp giOCFqd5eTIH0be51np5TqDgmhMclSkViy6i/Lvk/evo30O8ozluKNzS7looUaaNO2F9 Il74UMXD3gFvfytmwPjUYcLjF+6sMW6jzcH5xvaQWGyZ2WBuIrwbr1pWOKIyPZ7eTSZ1 Q99Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiRzhAWG47LuGiLPXZonfsm118zFtrbB+euuEBrG16srxL4fOwE 1LWr2kHlZptioj41+lsdkVIgrUFcnCI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62JzfcmtTLgPnjfZ6Kw6+wroHhN9Unb4BbPgqOyjBZN5YMJUK+AfCZhVBvaTbN5Hj/b600JeA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:44:: with SMTP id 62-v6mr17873347pla.181.1539620156120; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i21-v6sm15314052pgj.55.2018.10.15.09.15.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#10900: Clarification re: Regarding the observed bugs in cp To: 10900@debbugs.gnu.org References: <1346314115.7192.140661121424997.5126D631@webmail.messagingengine.com> <503F72E3.8010000@globaledgesoft.com> From: Assaf Gordon Message-ID: <67157684-b583-bcd4-281b-ce3ee27637d5@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:15:53 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <503F72E3.8010000@globaledgesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10900 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 10900 moreinfo close 10900 stop (triaging old bugs) On 30/08/12 10:39 PM, era eriksson wrote: > > From: subratkumar > To: era eriksson > Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:04 > > On Thursday 30 August 2012 01:38 PM, era eriksson wrote: > > I stumbled across your recent bug report for cp > [1]http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10900 > and I was wondering if you could follow up with a bit of additional > information. What did you expect to happen, and what should be fixed in > order for cp to behave like you expect? With no further follow-ups in 6 years, I'm closing this bug. Discussion can continue by replying to this thread. regards, - assaf From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:21:47 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator