From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:44:23 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10842: Cancelling a new mail in message-mode ignores rmail-mail-new-frame Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 10842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 10842@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13296026834779 (code B ref -1); Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:05:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2012 22:04:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44971 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RysOY-0001F1-67 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:04:42 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:46867 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RysOW-0001Es-7O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:04:40 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RysMX-0004Y5-Pi; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:02:37 -0500 From: Glenn Morris X-Spook: ammunition Crypto AG embassy UMTS nitrate Ansar al-Islam X-Ran: >Hv<&Z`x+nH-w7b`{F2Xf"-/bm3G[kJ?V:G~'WyKdh5#l0<]4ZjjY&)2ie,oW0Off@zDM) X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:02:37 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Package: emacs Version: 24.0.93 Severity: minor emacs -Q \ --eval "(setq rmail-mail-new-frame t mail-user-agent 'sendmail-user-agent)" M-x rmail m -> new frame appears for mail composition Choose Mail menu, Cancel -> frame disappears repeat with the default message-user-agent: Choose Message menu, Kill Message -> frame does not disappear If you fix this, you can restore (a suitably modified version of) this commented-out text in rmail.texi: @ignore @c FIXME does not work with Message -> Kill Message , or when you use the @samp{Cancel} item in the @samp{Mail} menu. @end ignore From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:44:23 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10842: Cancelling a new mail in message-mode ignores rmail-mail-new-frame Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 08:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: 10842@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10842-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10842.132972667825481 (code B ref 10842); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 08:32:01 +0000 Received: (at 10842) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2012 08:31:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46647 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzOeP-0006cr-Th for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 03:31:18 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:44996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzOeJ-0006cg-9X for 10842@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 03:31:12 -0500 Received: from 93-41-188-50.ip82.fastwebnet.it ([93.41.188.50] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzOc4-0001HW-BO; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:28:48 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:28:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:02:37 -0500") Message-ID: <87k43h7vsx.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1RzOc4-0001HW-BO X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1330331328.58023@fjEuNnJgoH1vPPVoVBZzMw X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Glenn Morris writes: > emacs -Q \ > --eval "(setq rmail-mail-new-frame t mail-user-agent 'sendmail-user-agent)" > M-x rmail > m [...] > Choose Message menu, Kill Message > -> frame does not disappear This is an rmail bug and not a Message bug, I guess? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:44:23 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10842: Cancelling a new mail in message-mode ignores rmail-mail-new-frame Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 10842@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10842-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10842.132976488027201 (code B ref 10842); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:08:02 +0000 Received: (at 10842) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2012 19:08:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47754 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzYaa-00074b-4o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:07:59 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:55823 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzYaX-00074T-4f for 10842@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:07:54 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzYYN-0005Hu-1I; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:05:39 -0500 From: Glenn Morris References: <87k43h7vsx.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spook: INS Taiwan spies covert video enemy of the state Skipjack X-Ran: {U.Zb,)L,R[n5EX}pNlH=Uz>{\vTg9_tkPM*M1`O@6XCc`rty8?3!5r>pJ?jHG#zcEUn{7 X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:05:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k43h7vsx.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:28:46 +0100") Message-ID: <05bootcol9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > This is an rmail bug and not a Message bug, I guess? I don't really see how it could be. At first glance, it seems that message-kill-buffer does not run message-bury, and hence does not process the return-action of compose-mail. Compare with message-dont-send, which does delete the frame. From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:44:23 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10842: Cancelling a new mail in message-mode ignores rmail-mail-new-frame Resent-From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: 10842@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10842-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10842.133133783416462 (code B ref 10842); Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:04:02 +0000 Received: (at 10842) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2012 00:03:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S69mr-0004HS-P7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:03:54 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:36469) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S69mp-0004HK-7m for 10842@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:03:52 -0500 Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S69K4-0008VV-LC; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:34:08 +0100 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen References: <87k43h7vsx.fsf@gnus.org> <05bootcol9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Talk Talk's _Asides Besides (1)_: "It's My Life (Extended Version)" Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:34:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <05bootcol9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:05:38 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1S69K4-0008VV-LC X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1331940848.83198@iF2niJBGJIXRlexFz24nrQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Glenn Morris writes: > I don't really see how it could be. At first glance, it seems that > message-kill-buffer does not run message-bury, and hence does not > process the return-action of compose-mail. Compare with > message-dont-send, which does delete the frame. I see. Well, I don't use either rmail nor use pop-up frames, so I'm probably the wrong person to try to fix this. Unless absolutely nobody else can, that is... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/ From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:44:23 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10842: Cancelling a new mail in message-mode ignores rmail-mail-new-frame Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 15:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: 10842@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10842-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10842.15692515294250 (code B ref 10842); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 15:13:02 +0000 Received: (at 10842) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2019 15:12:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36749 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCQ0W-00016T-57 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:12:09 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:38088) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCQ0U-00016G-5V for 10842@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:12:06 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCQ0Q-0008MJ-6F; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:12:04 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:12:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 18 Feb 2012 17:02:37 -0500") Message-ID: <8736gn59oe.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Glenn Morris writes: > emacs -Q \ > --eval "(setq rmail-mail-new-frame t mail-user-agent 'sendmail-user-agent)" > M-x rmail > m > -> new frame appears for mail composition > Choose Mail menu, Cancel > -> frame disappears Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Glenn Morris writes: > emacs -Q \ > --eval "(setq rmail-mail-new-frame t mail-user-agent 'sendmail-user-agent)" > M-x rmail > m > -> new frame appears for mail composition > Choose Mail menu, Cancel > -> frame disappears And it should disappear, so that's the bug? What command does that "Cancel" menu run? Glenn Morris writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > >> This is an rmail bug and not a Message bug, I guess? > > I don't really see how it could be. At first glance, it seems that > message-kill-buffer does not run message-bury, and hence does not > process the return-action of compose-mail. Compare with > message-dont-send, which does delete the frame. message-dont-send is return-action, which is documented as --- RETURN-ACTION, if non-nil, is an action for returning to the caller. It has the form (FUNCTION . ARGS). The function is called after the mail has been sent or put aside, and the mail buffer buried. --- message-kill-buffer isn't what's meant by return-action in the compose-mail interface, I think? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:44:23 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10842: Cancelling a new mail in message-mode ignores rmail-mail-new-frame Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 10842@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10842-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10842.156960190227835 (code B ref 10842); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:32:02 +0000 Received: (at 10842) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2019 16:31:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48591 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt9h-0007Ed-TK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:31:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36671) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt9f-00078V-DX for 10842@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:31:39 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44518) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt9Z-0002IR-Rs; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:31:34 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt9W-0006dg-Fc; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:31:30 -0400 From: Glenn Morris References: <8736gn59oe.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spook: Bosnia Mitigation Emergency management Fortezza SCUD X-Ran: GF@a5"D(33_}?$wo)f\!#+Nc[M%/U&{Ot5k\Hq}.`C)Y`0;$SH<0b{'{B^3q2@#)y@.ILY X-Hue: brightyellow X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:31:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8736gn59oe.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:12:01 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) I don't know how to explain it any better than in the OP. The intent of the Rmail code is that discarding a draft should delete the frame. It works with mail mode but not message mode. From unknown Fri Jun 13 11:44:23 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10842: Cancelling a new mail in message-mode ignores rmail-mail-new-frame Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: 10842@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10842-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10842.156974955519302 (code B ref 10842); Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 10842) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2019 09:32:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52245 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEVZD-00051G-G7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 05:32:35 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:49796) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEVZB-000518-QH for 10842@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 05:32:34 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEVZ8-00073C-2W; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 11:32:32 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <8736gn59oe.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 11:32:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:31:29 -0400") Message-ID: <8736gfqwgi.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Glenn Morris writes: > I don't know how to explain it any better than in the OP. > The intent of the Rmail code is that discarding a draft should delete > the frame. It works with mail mode but not message mode. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Glenn Morris writes: > I don't know how to explain it any better than in the OP. > The intent of the Rmail code is that discarding a draft should delete > the frame. It works with mail mode but not message mode. Message has two ways of returning to the caller (while not sending anything). message-dont-send runs RETURN-ACTION (which is presumably what Rmail uses to close the frame etc), while message-kill-buffer does not run RETURN-ACTION. I don't see how to reconcile that on the Message side. Rmail could set message-kill-actions to whatever it wants, which is why I think this is an Rmail bug. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no