GNU bug report logs - #10840
24.0.93; No `man' command completion on Windows (using Cygwin for man pages)

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 10840 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 10840 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 24.0.93;
	No `man' command completion on Windows (using Cygwin for man pages)
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:51:23 -0800

I have Cygwin installed (a rather old version; dunno which one or how to
tell).  I load `cygwin-mount.el', then `setup-cygwin.el', both of which
are available on EmacsWiki:
 
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/download/cygwin-mount.el
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/download/setup-cygwin.el
 
emacs -Q
 
M-x man RET
 
Hitting TAB (with no minibuffer input) completes the empty input to the
two chars `^:'.  Thereafter I can do nothing with that.  Whether I type
anything after the `^:' or not, TAB just completes to `^:'.
 
If I instead first type `l' (as in `ls') and then hit TAB, I get [No
match].  It doesn't seem to matter what I type in the minibuffer: TAB
always says [No match].
 
(I can of course enter a complete command name, such as `ls' and hit
RET.  `man' then works correctly.  It is only the UNIX command-name
completion that is seemingly broken.
 
Am I missing something?  I tried to debug this a bit but wasn't
successful in following what was happening.  Please advise.  Thx.
 

In GNU Emacs 24.0.93.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2012-02-15 on MARVIN
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
Configured using:
 `configure --with-gcc (4.6) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/include
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/src
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1/include
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2/include
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4/include
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include
 -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9/include'
 

Message #8 received at 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10840: 24.0.93;
	No `man' command completion on Windows (using Cygwin for man pages)
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:18:32 +0200

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:51:23 -0800
> 
> emacs -Q
>  
> M-x man RET
>  
> Hitting TAB (with no minibuffer input) completes the empty input to the
> two chars `^:'.  Thereafter I can do nothing with that.  Whether I type
> anything after the `^:' or not, TAB just completes to `^:'.

man.el invokes the `man' command with "^" concatenated to whatever you
typed.  So the question becomes what does your port of `man' produce
if you invoke it from the shell command line like this:

   man ^

Message #11 received at 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10840: 24.0.93;
	No `man' command completion on Windows (using Cygwin for man pages)
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:19:10 +0200

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:51:23 -0800
> 
> emacs -Q
>  
> M-x man RET
>  
> Hitting TAB (with no minibuffer input) completes the empty input to the
> two chars `^:'.  Thereafter I can do nothing with that.  Whether I type
> anything after the `^:' or not, TAB just completes to `^:'.

man.el invokes the `man' command with "^" concatenated to whatever you
typed.  So the question becomes what does your port of `man' produce
if you invoke it from the shell command line like this:

   man -k ^

Message #14 received at 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#10840: 24.0.93;
	No `man' command completion on Windows (using Cygwin for man pages)
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:28:04 -0800

> man.el invokes the `man' command with "^" concatenated to whatever you
> typed.  So the question becomes what does your port of `man' produce
> if you invoke it from the shell command line like this:
> 
>    man -k ^

You also sent a mail saying to try `man ^', i.e., without `-k'.  I tried both.

 $ man -k ^
 ^: nothing appropriate

 $ man ^
 No manual entry for ^

Dunno whether that helps.  As I said, if I type nothing in the minibuffer and
then hit TAB it completes to `^:' with no further completion available.  If I
instead type something (e.g. `l') and then hit TAB I get the message `[No
match]'.

The shell is bash.  (And "man ls RET" works fine at the bash prompt.)

Message #17 received at 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10840: 24.0.93;
	No `man' command completion on Windows (using Cygwin for man pages)
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 06:00:12 +0200

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Cc: <10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:28:04 -0800
> 
>  $ man -k ^
>  ^: nothing appropriate

I guess your `man' doesn't support this option, or maybe it needs for
you to create the apropos database.  In any case, "M-x man" should
handle this kind of output gracefully, which it evidently doesn't.

Message #20 received at 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#10840: 24.0.93;
	No `man' command completion on Windows (using Cygwin for man pages)
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 17:14:39 -0700

> >  $ man -k ^
> >  ^: nothing appropriate
> 
> I guess your `man' doesn't support this option, or maybe it needs for
> you to create the apropos database.  In any case, "M-x man" should
> handle this kind of output gracefully, which it evidently doesn't.

ping

Message #23 received at 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Wolfgang Jenkner <wjenkner <at> inode.at>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 'Eli Zaretskii' <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10840: 24.0.93;
	No `man' command completion on Windows (using Cygwin for man pages)
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:06:44 +0100

On Mon, Sep 17 2012, Drew Adams wrote:

>> >  $ man -k ^
>> >  ^: nothing appropriate
>> 
>> I guess your `man' doesn't support this option, or maybe it needs for
>> you to create the apropos database.  In any case, "M-x man" should
>> handle this kind of output gracefully, which it evidently doesn't.
>
> ping

As Eli suggested, the question is if your man program supports the `-k'
option.

If you don't have a `whatis' database you should have a `makewhatis' or
a `mandb' program to generate it.

Then, please try

$ man -k ls

What do you get then? Does one of

$ apropos ls

or

$ whatis ls

work?

If there's no joy, please post the output of

$ man -h
$ man --help
$ man --version

Wolfgang

Message #26 received at 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Wolfgang Jenkner <wjenkner <at> inode.at>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10840: 24.0.93;
	No `man' command completion on Windows (using Cygwin for man pages)
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 19:11:50 +0100

On Sat, Dec 15 2012, Wolfgang Jenkner wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 17 2012, Drew Adams wrote:
>
>>> >  $ man -k ^
>>> >  ^: nothing appropriate
>>> 
>>> I guess your `man' doesn't support this option, or maybe it needs for
>>> you to create the apropos database.  In any case, "M-x man" should
>>> handle this kind of output gracefully, which it evidently doesn't.
>>
>> ping
>
> As Eli suggested, the question is if your man program supports the `-k'
> option.
>
> If you don't have a `whatis' database you should have a `makewhatis' or
> a `mandb' program to generate it.

I suspect you have the man program from

http://primates.ximian.com/~flucifredi/man/

In this case, essentially, "man -k ^" ends up calling "apropos ^", which
gives this output if it can't find any `whatis' database file or all
those files are empty.

Otherwise, "man -k ^" works fine, even in the 1999 vintage man-1.5g.

Also, `apropos' is a shell script, so you can easily inspect it and
debug your `man' installation.

> Hitting TAB (with no minibuffer input) completes the empty input to the
> two chars `^:'.  Thereafter I can do nothing with that.  Whether I type
> anything after the `^:' or not, TAB just completes to `^:'.

The empty string is a prefix of "^:",

> If I instead first type `l' (as in `ls') and then hit TAB, I get [No
> match].  It doesn't seem to matter what I type in the minibuffer: TAB
> always says [No match].

but "l" is not a prefix of "^l:".

Message #29 received at 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Wolfgang Jenkner <wjenkner <at> inode.at>
Cc: 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: Re: bug#10840: 24.0.93;
 No `man' command completion on Windows (using Cygwin for man pages)
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 21:13:26 -0800

Wolfgang Jenkner <wjenkner <at> inode.at> writes:

> I suspect you have the man program from
>
> http://primates.ximian.com/~flucifredi/man/
>
> In this case, essentially, "man -k ^" ends up calling "apropos ^", which
> gives this output if it can't find any `whatis' database file or all
> those files are empty.
>
> Otherwise, "man -k ^" works fine, even in the 1999 vintage man-1.5g.
>
> Also, `apropos' is a shell script, so you can easily inspect it and
> debug your `man' installation.

This doesn't seem to be an Emacs bug, then.  Closing.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/

Message #34 received at 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, Wolfgang Jenkner <wjenkner <at> inode.at>
Cc: 10840 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#10840: 24.0.93; No `man' command completion on Windows (using
 Cygwin for man pages)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:38:28 -0800 (PST)

> This doesn't seem to be an Emacs bug, then.  Closing.

Hm, I don't see why it follows from what Eli said that there is
no Emacs bug here.  Here is what he said:


  I guess your `man' doesn't support this option, or maybe it
  needs for you to create the apropos database.

  In any case, "M-x man" should handle this kind of output gracefully,
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  which it evidently doesn't.

Sounds like an Emacs bug, to me.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.