GNU bug report logs - #10819
[BUG][RM]

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: "jeremy.magrin <at> epitech.eu" <jeremy.magrin <at> epitech.eu>

Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:11:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo

Done: "Voelker, Bernhard" <bernhard.voelker <at> siemens-enterprise.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: "Voelker, Bernhard" <bernhard.voelker <at> siemens-enterprise.com>
To: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>, Davide Brini <dave_br <at> gmx.com>
Cc: "10819 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <10819 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: bug#10819: [BUG][RM]
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:17:16 +0100
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Davide Brini wrote:
> ...
> > At least in bash, but I suppose in other shells too,
> >
> > rm -rf #*
> >
> > treats the "#*" part as a comment, and (if you remove the "-f") complains
> > about missing operand to rm.
> 
> That is the default, but for an interactive shell,
> that behavior can be changed:
> 
>     $ echo a b # c
>     a b
>     $ shopt -u interactive_comments
>     $ echo a b # c
>     a b # c

I think Davide's point is not about the # comment ... rm won't see
that on argv anyway. The point is that 'rm -f' does not complain about
missing operands while 'rm' does:

  $ rm 
  rm: missing operand
  Try `rm --help' for more information.
  $ rm -f
  $

According to the info, '-f' just silences error messages for files
which do not exist (and never to prompt for confirmation), but why
should it also affect the "missing operand" message?

Have a nice day,
Berny









This bug report was last modified 13 years and 94 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.