From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 14 22:06:16 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2012 03:06:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40832 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxVCB-0005Su-IR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:06:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52969) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxUlG-0004rT-FO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:38:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxUjY-0006GB-Rl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:36:41 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:43854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxUjY-0006G7-Pj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:36:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxUjX-0004Qg-RY for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:36:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxUjW-0006Fx-Q4 for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:36:39 -0500 Received: from kcout02.prserv.net ([12.154.55.32]:59986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxUjW-0006Fr-Bq for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:36:38 -0500 Received: from bowden (118-92-91-213.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz[118.92.91.213]) by prserv.net (kcout02) with SMTP id <20120215023631202002meble> (Authid: nzinet.kz7nzl); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:36:36 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [118.92.91.213] From: "Terry Bowden" To: Subject: Updates to coreutils Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:36:28 +1300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:06:13 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) I have a package dating back to 2005. Example: 04/21/2005 07:41 AM 23,552 basename.exe 04/21/2005 07:41 AM 62,464 cat.exe 04/21/2005 07:41 AM 83,968 chgrp.exe 04/21/2005 07:41 AM 81,920 chmod.exe 04/21/2005 07:41 AM 86,016 chown.exe 04/21/2005 07:41 AM 24,576 chroot.exe 04/21/2005 07:41 AM 25,600 cksum.exe Is there any later release? I make extensive use of these functions and love them to pieces. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 14 23:06:11 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2012 04:06:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40844 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxW87-0006oZ-V5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:06:11 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxW84-0006o0-MT; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:06:06 -0500 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1F44JJ8022624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:04:19 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.25] (ovpn-113-25.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.25]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1F44Ip4013657; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:04:19 -0500 Message-ID: <4F3B2EC2.4000803@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:04:18 -0700 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120131 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Terry Bowden Subject: Re: bug#10812: Updates to coreutils References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD9B74A3C7AB3F1826CABCEF7" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: 10812-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD9B74A3C7AB3F1826CABCEF7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable tag 10812 notabug thanks On 02/14/2012 07:36 PM, Terry Bowden wrote: > I have a package dating back to 2005. Example: > 04/21/2005 07:41 AM 23,552 basename.exe >=20 > Is there any later release? Yes, coreutils 8.15 was released just this year. Given the extensions on your file names, it looks like you are using a Windows-based port of coreutils. Might I recommend you look into the cygwin project at cygwin.com, which includes coreutils 8.15 as part of the installation? Since this is not a bug report against upstream coreutils, so much as a question better directed to the people that port GNU software to Windows, I'm closing this report. --=20 Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enigD9B74A3C7AB3F1826CABCEF7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPOy7CAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqubIIALAEmf73/Sw15G6V1Tag52CU raxRWxR9mqw5Vv3eK5XjrseBG6GKWhPTTF5uX489sGu2hrVfhpwKLQMGoqF+SAy4 aysfjpt6qPU89Pb4noUlCJeT7zmuVmSMM9VO3gUx0nwKvc9vOHAj2Klmwhex7XVy sDE2bd+HdH+efg0UcuiMm3Enb+tBczeJRUxMtAn++kFvagmtsHW/xZ3s1aKh+0Ew JfH0nUr/LlF2tqRGXi5Ny2N/kLgEd6jqssned+OSNRSlpX5GMI3e8jAOsEvlGdxx jtwLlyjVDyhcO2kvIYHHgNr+qD55Cnw9ZeoKqQELYvkY4x/hfDGvENm58qpILvE= =OqxE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD9B74A3C7AB3F1826CABCEF7-- From unknown Tue Aug 19 04:06:32 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator