From unknown Wed Aug 20 02:46:31 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#10806 <10806@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#10806 <10806@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.0.93; `cancel-edebug-on-entry': many tiny problems Reply-To: bug#10806 <10806@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 09:46:31 +0000 retitle 10806 24.0.93; `cancel-edebug-on-entry': many tiny problems reassign 10806 emacs submitter 10806 michael_heerdegen@web.de severity 10806 minor tag 10806 fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 13 17:56:31 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2012 22:56:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39356 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx4ox-000351-8m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:56:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52038) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx4ov-00034q-KJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:56:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx4nL-0002Ch-4B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:54:51 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:49234) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx4nL-0002Cd-2f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:54:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx4nK-0001P4-55 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:54:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx4nI-0002CK-RU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:54:50 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234]:57890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx4nI-0002CG-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:54:48 -0500 Received: from moweb001.kundenserver.de (moweb001.kundenserver.de [172.19.20.114]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5422C1B178030 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:54:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from snow.dragon ([82.113.119.109]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LuMER-1SgPdh2ctD-011dkA; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:54:47 +0100 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:55:59 +0100 Message-Id: <87wr7ql4w0.fsf@web.de> From: Michael Heerdegen To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.0.93; `cancel-edebug-on-entry': many tiny problems X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:YKDaJ5Lpr3MdWyjnF4uj/uvN/rUU2a+qrXbPZIB0eyr uxj/H3BjIxOxxEGNJRxFbXoIUkmX5JB9W4U4JHECXz7Ernkmg7 c42jNOlvqJFpSjIkS3ryE0FDg9r9SQI5/8eASeud+TqRzRPwNf lMUzHCi3BgnwaZbIJk1ljBVlfAiyobE2OFI+v3C5XfhVbsujo9 oHYOlIVhNmlvUBJjs7Kf+ImuXeVNSml0D+zZ1GB6GE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: michael_heerdegen@web.de List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) 1. It is a user command, but is has no docstring. 2. The user can't find it easily: it doesn't start with "edebug". I needed to consult the source to find it. Can we at least add something like (defalias 'edebug-cancel-edebug-on-entry #'cancel-edebug-on-entry) 3. The prompt string "Edebug on entry to: " should include the word "cancel". 4. Wouldn't it be better to limit the input to functions that are instrumented? Thanks, Michael. In GNU Emacs 24.0.93.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.2.3) of 2012-02-08 on zelenka, modified by Debian (emacs-snapshot package, version 2:20120208-1) Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11103901 Configured using: `configure '--build' 'i486-linux-gnu' '--host' 'i486-linux-gnu' '--prefix=/usr' '--sharedstatedir=/var/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/lib' '--localstatedir=/var' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-pop=yes' '--enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs-snapshot:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/24.0.93/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/24.0.93/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp' '--without-compress-info' '--with-crt-dir=/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/' '--with-x=yes' '--with-x-toolkit=gtk3' '--with-imagemagick=yes' 'build_alias=i486-linux-gnu' 'host_alias=i486-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-DDEBIAN -DSITELOAD_PURESIZE_EXTRA=5000 -g -O2'' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 21 14:48:56 2012 Received: (at 10806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2012 18:48:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60056 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAQaU-0006yi-Tw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:48:56 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:51047) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAQaO-0006yN-70 for 10806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:48:46 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AokGAKU/KE9FxKFU/2dsb2JhbACBX48mjVV5iHCeGYYZBJsZhAk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="169221234" Received: from 69-196-161-84.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.161.84]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 21 Mar 2012 14:17:57 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B61F558C3D; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:17:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: michael_heerdegen@web.de Subject: Re: bug#10806: 24.0.93; `cancel-edebug-on-entry': many tiny problems Message-ID: References: <87wr7ql4w0.fsf@web.de> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:17:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wr7ql4w0.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:55:59 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10806 Cc: 10806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) > 1. It is a user command, but is has no docstring. > 2. The user can't find it easily: it doesn't start with "edebug". I > needed to consult the source to find it. Can we at least add > something like > (defalias 'edebug-cancel-edebug-on-entry #'cancel-edebug-on-entry) Yes. > 3. The prompt string "Edebug on entry to: " should include the word > "cancel". Yes. > 4. Wouldn't it be better to limit the input to functions that are > instrumented? Yes (or we could also consider making edebug-on-entry into a toggle). Patch welcome for 24.2, Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 03:48:57 2019 Received: (at 10806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 07:48:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53740 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM5xR-0004dw-3Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 03:48:57 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:42100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM5xP-0004do-9u for 10806@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 03:48:55 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM5xL-0004Yl-QX; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 09:48:54 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#10806: 24.0.93; `cancel-edebug-on-entry': many tiny problems References: <87wr7ql4w0.fsf@web.de> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 09:48:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wr7ql4w0.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:55:59 +0100") Message-ID: <87d0erg8m4.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Michael Heerdegen writes: > 1. It is a user command, but is has no docstring. > > 2. The user can't find it easily: it doesn't start with "edebug". I > needed to consult the source to find it. Can we at least add > something l [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10806 Cc: 10806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Michael Heerdegen writes: > 1. It is a user command, but is has no docstring. > > 2. The user can't find it easily: it doesn't start with "edebug". I > needed to consult the source to find it. Can we at least add > something like > > (defalias 'edebug-cancel-edebug-on-entry #'cancel-edebug-on-entry) > > 3. The prompt string "Edebug on entry to: " should include the word > "cancel". > > 4. Wouldn't it be better to limit the input to functions that are > instrumented? It looks like these things have been fixed in the years since -- except that it looks like it's had a doc string since at least 2005, and the prompt has mentioned "cancel" since that time, too? But the alias hasn't been added -- Stefan OK'd it, though, so I've now added it in Emacs 27, and I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 03:49:06 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 07:49:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53744 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM5xa-0004eg-CA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 03:49:06 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:42118) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM5xY-0004eY-7p for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 03:49:05 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM5xV-0004Yu-E9 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 09:49:03 +0200 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 09:48:56 +0200 Message-Id: <87blubg8lz.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #10806 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 10806 fixed close 10806 27.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 10806 fixed close 10806 27.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 04:30:17 2019 Received: (at 10806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 08:30:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53760 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM6bR-00086d-3y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 04:30:17 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:42724) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM6bP-000846-5M for 10806@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 04:30:15 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM6bK-0004uy-Af; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:30:14 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#10806: 24.0.93; `cancel-edebug-on-entry': many tiny problems References: <87wr7ql4w0.fsf@web.de> <87d0erg8m4.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:30:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87d0erg8m4.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 09:48:51 +0200") Message-ID: <871rv7g6pa.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > It looks like these things have been fixed in the years since -- except > that it looks like it's had a doc string since at least 2005, and the > prompt has mentioned "cancel" since that time, too? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10806 Cc: 10806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > It looks like these things have been fixed in the years since -- except > that it looks like it's had a doc string since at least 2005, and the > prompt has mentioned "cancel" since that time, too? > > But the alias hasn't been added -- Stefan OK'd it, though, so I've now > added it in Emacs 27, and I'm closing this bug report. I was confused -- I was looking at cancel-debug-on-entry, not cancel-edebug-on-entry. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 04:51:53 2019 Received: (at 10806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 08:51:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM6wL-0001yX-3N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 04:51:53 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:43064) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM6wJ-0001yP-T0 for 10806@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 04:51:52 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM6wE-00056n-G2; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:51:50 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#10806: 24.0.93; `cancel-edebug-on-entry': many tiny problems References: <87wr7ql4w0.fsf@web.de> <87d0erg8m4.fsf@gnus.org> <871rv7g6pa.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:51:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871rv7g6pa.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:30:09 +0200") Message-ID: <87woczer4t.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> It looks like these things have been fixed in the years since -- except >> that it looks like it's had a doc string since at least 2005, and the >> pr [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10806 Cc: 10806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> It looks like these things have been fixed in the years since -- except >> that it looks like it's had a doc string since at least 2005, and the >> prompt has mentioned "cancel" since that time, too? >> >> But the alias hasn't been added -- Stefan OK'd it, though, so I've now >> added it in Emacs 27, and I'm closing this bug report. > > I was confused -- I was looking at cancel-debug-on-entry, not > cancel-edebug-on-entry. I've now fixed the things the bug report mentioned in Emacs 27. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 06:21:01 2019 Received: (at 10806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 10:21:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53831 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM8KZ-0008Kp-Fh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 06:21:01 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:52525) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM8KW-0008KZ-Ro for 10806@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 06:20:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1571566850; bh=ZLfSUBnBxZdyDmiRep1JzWjrwBa+q7ThkHBYxG/BX2k=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=aIMqPXRsSHLVohzdfiR1LoRQnVOfbI5hsQWCoLysXOpuKAXejR74nrj0f5DClkGQG 9WJ8uvg7Dz3X8Br9LNEJhCuVOKtLL4JrrFxRPMqC0QFaOp8nnJF2Bp9x8QElAtnouv y0N16H0H89+Ch602JGu2Ov7ENEHvSj4bY+2CWOgI= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.222.9]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHY1o-1iIq0k1QRY-003Psb; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:20:50 +0200 From: Michael Heerdegen To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#10806: 24.0.93; `cancel-edebug-on-entry': many tiny problems References: <87wr7ql4w0.fsf@web.de> <87d0erg8m4.fsf@gnus.org> <871rv7g6pa.fsf@gnus.org> <87woczer4t.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:20:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87woczer4t.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 10:51:46 +0200") Message-ID: <871rv7yayf.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ZONwwRAqIuaZbhLE8I3YBYclDcKbdoGpSx2Sax/I0lW23B1k04D ILGX/uvPDlb8FYHsrqb0zq18RSJgt8oF9YlPxvf7lfobDTxQCcicqIc2e5Cs50M9+hH5WMl ou1YjzKlucPZ3TBSKZt0koCwjrJ5R/C9Sv33177kjjWXwoxPmQCxSmU4SMiDiMUexOIRsJh 7oLJNHQqVy1uBZkK9a9qw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:jGI3ncfdHsI=:FcoQRTLA9rkqw+1j2PSgIm j032kQQhpqFI67LHfh8GIBMubANo0VIfURhw4kdf0Fq2E+tr5l1VBI0AmFf9hS5/xGJncFwr5 ZEiXUkuJ+BIlbwqVXrGWOa3i+bMIoKFuKuH/ZdDlBiYKH5wVjatFZGgeidQC46sXp18wG9jBy S1Kw6DtvQQzjBDYdfWrd7NvbRObU+jRI+58xje8Tf7DJwcU1uw7EF/+pnDH7OUz0HVOEdHmfv VOCz1EQmMiSqXHijo3mFQ1MZ+32XH6aU3Hf89CEjEjSkR9qvWWq/RZZedyX8gFaPkPWGkymdy Xri65bTdVH2sgn5SddKEaHe5+cPx4YkXBMYNcYalaSwxlNj0JqrPb8TKBh8zIlRadiNBGMmuT 5mJxsjM1mDjLadOKeMX973Dv9QdLnCA1PMUyAk4J9nhjmnbeStzYYhk3uOy67MNN2VaXQHTS7 NA8KTIfALNIj7EITvMunMr+c+6pvdLnxrZRY3/PsG7spbnhbmsHWnfQxrC5P8UbdZTXSWcN8w uo/TYbNmltI6HFzIcnnG7xrdcrqsagag+vbF7wuOlkbg+RACznnWid3RrAeRxCI4HfWVxo6hu v2RbgN+4OQdfyAtQ0sIoeCxvFXGhXj1ppGstYjNLEA9uhPStGoW5+OmeUOrAL3EwEI7bpN5HV xPnAx+t2HuCxbLgfA/Ha6yjEaKLKoF7dbwHQoPwjtyMgNWpUY78dIZPwt5YKpdQA8+vvty86+ 6RJzJX9Jday2OPsPvOcbO10IUr25BztxjLrtHSVXe4EOhgDy3ErMt6Ut7Qn1Ye4lKZ9HT+mef e/4nasDtYtVQiSlkUxVh+v+IAVjZRIixlw4KSmj4/Gw7cIxF4vLP/KkKNvGVQ1MheAseD4Phs vVO2Wj99rp77hCHRY5/BERm3XzEJUtoQPlmE88G5GFLp6lm2ISJOwQqO6OlDHSBlolaw7qvII 7cW7kBjVqpvNgi9dvUpBAl9LesEsxyZI4blr2B2MLUoMbn7FoORsOUXTopeJXW/wErlBffk2T 3WwTUaLQFjCxz4VACKk3Fp79JXTyn4nEX1sZc+IMWhhCNYuJBy4uaDFLDMc+OvDUAEA+S9ORI tAg/MkSbEZxuHeBpjAutVckZ4ur/rHGe0eZKFvUDIrosbATBAkDFOeHjtqaG0OJdVlDwjHZc0 ibvYlmMnSS/nSAhQjmOY7bnRyOHzQSTXC+C+LVUihVdojSTk5+eq1wATyfyCVzbh+5wbSdDkg G+bEc3X5wGh9k1NStFjaRBSppNKAZIyXf7fV8BYfUy8L8KSO+BeZMmBgKwjM= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10806 Cc: 10806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I've now fixed the things the bug report mentioned in Emacs 27. Thanks! Two comments: (1) > + (unless functions > + (error "No functions have `edebug-on-entry'.")) Should this better be a `user-error' (and I guess the error message should not end with a period)? (2) Would it make sense to make the default behavior analog to that of `cancel-debug-on-entry': remove edebug-on-entry property of all functions? Regards, Michael. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 06:37:57 2019 Received: (at 10806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 10:37:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53851 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM8az-0002RC-N6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 06:37:57 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45208) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM8ax-0002R2-Cp for 10806@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 06:37:56 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM8au-00068W-09; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:37:54 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#10806: 24.0.93; `cancel-edebug-on-entry': many tiny problems References: <87wr7ql4w0.fsf@web.de> <87d0erg8m4.fsf@gnus.org> <871rv7g6pa.fsf@gnus.org> <87woczer4t.fsf@gnus.org> <871rv7yayf.fsf@web.de> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:37:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871rv7yayf.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 12:20:56 +0200") Message-ID: <87h843hfcw.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Michael Heerdegen writes: >> + (unless functions >> + (error "No functions have `edebug-on-entry'.")) > > Should this better be a `user-error' (and I guess the error message > should not end with a period)? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10806 Cc: 10806@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Michael Heerdegen writes: >> + (unless functions >> + (error "No functions have `edebug-on-entry'.")) > > Should this better be a `user-error' (and I guess the error message > should not end with a period)? Yup; fixed now. > (2) Would it make sense to make the default behavior analog to that of > `cancel-debug-on-entry': remove edebug-on-entry property of all > functions? Hm... Good idea. I've now made this change. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Wed Aug 20 02:46:31 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator