From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:55:10 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#10759 <10759@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#10759 <10759@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Reply-To: bug#10759 <10759@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 18:55:10 +0000 retitle 10759 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ reassign 10759 emacs submitter 10759 Leo severity 10759 minor thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 08 00:41:41 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2012 05:41:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59773 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0Hi-0005Vi-Cx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:41:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0Hc-0005VQ-QS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:41:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0GZ-00040h-Ap for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:40:28 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:32768) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0GZ-00040d-7I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:40:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0GY-0004Qm-7y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:40:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0GW-00040T-0n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:40:26 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:38353) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0GV-00040O-Sp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:40:23 -0500 Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so453985iag.0 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:40:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:x-debbugs-cc:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=yszsAiENSSU9ZHGy5FmxgfHToqlrMaEKbHdCiz1tWdg=; b=KZPlH4udfAGCxqmOvCF12qx5ND87obJ4Z/SX/exkhkHQa+g7IJBeGa+YLIjljbzcvu EfWPcuSIn6zqcrL5oldbGcUGmfL8O07n8qMQVjSOTfzCb+X53cjIhov/zVyeJlapLFLx 0YT20euMNqRujXH1Bikheid8p07GZgujynbeY= Received: by 10.42.145.131 with SMTP id f3mr30108924icv.8.1328679622711; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from Victoria.local ([119.255.41.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g34sm750037ibk.10.2012.02.07.21.40.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:40:22 -0800 (PST) From: Leo To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ X-Debbugs-CC: Stefan Monnier , Ted Zlatanov Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:40:07 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) There are ert-deftest littering around in $TOPDIR/lisp/. Could we have all the tests put in TOPDIR/test? Thanks. Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 13 13:49:12 2012 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2012 18:49:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39232 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx0xb-0005tY-J1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:49:12 -0500 Received: from z.lifelogs.com ([173.255.230.239]:46113) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx0xa-0005tQ-1b for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:49:10 -0500 Received: from heechee (c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [76.28.40.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tzz) by z.lifelogs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA64966930; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:47:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Ted Zlatanov To: Leo Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos References: X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:47:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:40:07 +0800") Message-ID: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10759 Cc: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:40:07 +0800 Leo wrote: L> There are ert-deftest littering around in $TOPDIR/lisp/. L> Could we have all the tests put in TOPDIR/test? Thanks. I've moved the url-future ERT test out to test/automated. Can I close this? Thanks Ted From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 13 20:25:04 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 01:25:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39410 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx78h-0006Qg-Nx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:25:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40983) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx78e-0006QC-Sp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:25:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx773-00078Q-QU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:23:22 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:55746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx773-00078M-P4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:23:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx772-0006Sq-TE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:23:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx772-00077u-3V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:23:20 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx771-00077n-Oj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:23:20 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx76y-0006ml-71 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:23:16 +0100 Received: from 119.255.41.67 ([119.255.41.67]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:23:16 +0100 Received: from sdl.web by 119.255.41.67 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:23:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Leo Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:23:00 +0800 Lines: 6 Message-ID: References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 119.255.41.67 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUKDAg1NjRWV1V9fnyg op/DxcLk5uP8/voi63ReAAAACXBIWXMAAAWJAAAFiQFtaJ36AAAAB3RJTUUH1goZAgAz00bgXgAA AeVJREFUKM9lk0Fz2jAQhQXJD3CCO70CmcC1YMtcWyTZ14Bl69xats4N9r6/3zWQBlodNKNPu/s0 b1cCQFuZGpfVVh3vAvBJolIXRkapSuoRUtIdFyo1Y5xSdlAj7OtvD1XnXxmWRi+eWgcxyCed1lVV B1CrKyujMoi+eLA5kU1SsjoHlW+nQjTtFxk4MXgrOxvIqzoTZR8XgPaLl419zgsMaSGFPiUOZCIh thsx5Xy9NsK8Kwf/JoQgMxcVJ301HKkcSWaT0O7FY056J4U9xcYfnmVXG4801lW6lqwu2nKFZoHC HuzvaTVndZ+LaRQgZdthXw1cpynEkLEwyFHXk/aIxNQ6QeooJuzPMB+wn+D7JJNsiCcVA13/A3h/ xE9J+WidpAwoYNmRFwyvSRhNVtsdaAewzZZP5uw82QL9+tyNfocyP0McAzICUr5Mk9RdIjWasUNx aIIt6NK4ZtXIMdfMQt3nuMAyWbLI4DqZ4xPq/ag8jPond4XU/cLuOgw6XCFX/YCUfcDAMMH58fD4 G9kDchwfqVefkBwup2uZM+Q4WhJt5jN3AxXCsaS2yXEDuWgS8VOzW0gFjhEPmLyFMKBFaLb1HRwc DiaKwx0EeTMRYnYPQRW3PP4HApvlMv0PttX5v/D6Aws3IOSEwzmLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lx/egzwaum4JdEYeiDMTMyH/B4g= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) On 2012-02-14 02:47 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > I've moved the url-future ERT test out to test/automated. Can I close this? Thank you for fixing this. Yes, please close it. Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 13 20:52:01 2012 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 01:52:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx7Ym-00074V-HS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:52:00 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:42438 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx7Yj-00074N-H9 for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:51:58 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx7XD-0004M7-8H; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:50:23 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: Leo Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Spook: freedom Project Monarch high security CIDA PLO ammunition X-Ran: l=x7hP5T:wBMn%A:e_Q}V_;Z1RJI#j+Q\P)I}K=nY!B (Leo's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:23:00 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10759 Cc: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Leo wrote: > On 2012-02-14 02:47 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> I've moved the url-future ERT test out to test/automated. Can I close this? > > Thank you for fixing this. Yes, please close it. You don't care about the ones in gnus/registry.el, gnus/gnus-registry.el then? :) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 13 21:42:15 2012 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 02:42:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39449 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx8LO-0008DQ-JU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:42:15 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]:36949) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx8LN-0008DE-41 for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:42:13 -0500 Received: by iagf6 with SMTP id f6so5275768iag.3 for <10759@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:40:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=8UrShn9CBI3c88ZMQekCreI6ibuwGr9ehBxW4ziA0t4=; b=TgOekxhQfUXzqIoCWVxWCupFkGdJPUguL2smpXDQ3Ag5tQwl/SiF3ssVe7P717mxHl R+7ockGWixpp0nd0rmD2aC22MLQ/gde0naDx6fNfie1pBozX4ECxcG/tdQx4NR1UxSRJ CY/s+cNSvFC/w/vIXMiRQaCsTvuAXCQgAeCb0= Received: by 10.50.57.163 with SMTP id j3mr31218930igq.3.1329187233768; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:40:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([119.255.41.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ut1sm23803946igc.2.2012.02.13.18.40.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:40:32 -0800 (PST) From: Leo To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAElBMVEUAAAAAAP+LRRP0pGC+ vr7///+7mT1iAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMO DhglKe4AAAEsSURBVCjPbZNBboQwDEV/Cd4X9QJRThApmn0XYW+Jyf2v0m+HhqDBgiAe9rcTG7QH w/1Vn2Ar8gBb/ocywSN3qK9T3z4eFDB4eApocBpeBs1RSykoJd8gQcm8pGmHXFso3ajnmsqV0TnY DQkOfXUfN5NwaI7AWTVOyEhcu1aHmdWItHddUVUcUgUBCkitu8V6ditHVOVdqzl2EQ1ZVGTbdK0V 7cqn8vWzoU5Q/bF9Y/Y0cRU1xwkys5dJ+Dt6pBDWifcNQml8Gh2JVmPSoQzo7en0grswkxrUGYJ7 0hSxxAGr7ZMwYcHIzprpi7TENEE1xtiYxixRlCfPBsUUrwHD7uGIwATrbnODJcVrPpVn3hxiGloe m/S+z3CtuzUSMo83N4DPH+F0evwR3P4A2k+75838OKQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:40:18 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:50:23 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10759 Cc: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 2012-02-14 09:50 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: > You don't care about the ones in gnus/registry.el, gnus/gnus-registry.el > then? :) It'd be better to move them to the dedicated test directories too. But gnus is maintained outside Emacs. I don't know what best to do here. Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 14 08:22:23 2012 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 13:22:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39782 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxIKt-0007fQ-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:22:23 -0500 Received: from z.lifelogs.com ([173.255.230.239]:37396) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxIKr-0007fJ-Av for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:22:21 -0500 Received: from heechee (c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [76.28.40.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tzz) by z.lifelogs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 986DC7E0F2; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:20:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Ted Zlatanov To: Leo Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:20:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:40:18 +0800") Message-ID: <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10759 Cc: Glenn Morris , 10759@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:40:18 +0800 Leo wrote: L> On 2012-02-14 09:50 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: >> You don't care about the ones in gnus/registry.el, gnus/gnus-registry.el >> then? :) L> It'd be better to move them to the dedicated test directories too. But L> gnus is maintained outside Emacs. I don't know what best to do here. Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had its own test directory... Ted From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 14 09:36:25 2012 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 14:36:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxJUS-0004AP-6H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:36:25 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:56103) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxJUJ-0004A8-Qz for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:36:16 -0500 Received: from 93-41-188-50.ip82.fastwebnet.it ([93.41.188.50] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxJSX-0004HK-VU; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:34:22 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Leo Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:34:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:20:42 -0500") Message-ID: <87lio5fpqr.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1RxJSX-0004HK-VU X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1329834862.19211@XaJedZyge01Xex4+tlqTlA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10759 Cc: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Ted Zlatanov writes: > Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had > its own test directory... I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git Gnus. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 14 12:39:35 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 17:39:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40626 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMLm-0000wp-MN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:39:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37390) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMLk-0000wa-4f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:39:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMK5-0002XH-2S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:37:49 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:55469) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMK5-0002XD-09 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:37:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMJz-0000ED-IR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:37:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMJs-0002W3-SZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:37:43 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49337) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMJs-0002Vp-NS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:37:36 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMJn-0006PZ-Om for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:37:31 +0100 Received: from 123.123.251.60 ([123.123.251.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:37:31 +0100 Received: from sdl.web by 123.123.251.60 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:37:31 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Leo Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.123.251.60 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoAgMAAADxkFD+AAAADFBMVEUvT09qWs3/pQD///+J kUVcAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMLOd3veKQA AACuSURBVBjTldE9CgIxEAXgB+lEyFUC2wo5ikdZ8DSypxhMY7H9VuIVwlqkGRgnm59VsHGafIQ3 CZlAtmKIRaHETgYa12lqvEsPYKf8wXHsPGfqPaUM0g9aJPKFXkmNQmSDqwzz4Fpgpz+6WAPY2z5o uPJJpu0uypcl4nyCibMLQ8lCiVjayLoQvw5LsVKQuHPRR958HZbOcVsKeepcLxpByjycGvnKmY+c MBvrtyjfe0vmuLvdq/kAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:khyzvwzEsJJIiCZZu1n167PKsdQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) On 2012-02-14 21:20 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had > its own test directory... > > Ted On 2012-02-14 22:34 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git > Gnus. :-) I think we have what is needed to separate those tests and put them in the dedicated folders. What do you think? Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 14 14:12:41 2012 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 19:12:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40637 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxNnq-00031B-E4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:12:40 -0500 Received: from z.lifelogs.com ([173.255.230.239]:51818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxNnm-000311-SY for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:12:36 -0500 Received: from heechee (c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [76.28.40.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tzz) by z.lifelogs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E7A06E983; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:10:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Ted Zlatanov To: Leo , Ding Mailing List Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:10:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800") Message-ID: <87pqdh44e8.fsf@lifelogs.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10759 Cc: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800 Leo wrote: L> On 2012-02-14 21:20 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had >> its own test directory... L> On 2012-02-14 22:34 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git >> Gnus. :-) L> I think we have what is needed to separate those tests and put them in L> the dedicated folders. What do you think? Done, correctly I hope. Ding list: all the registry.el and gnus-registry.el ERT tests are moved to tests/gnustest-registry.el Any other tests I should move? Thanks Ted From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 15 08:43:32 2012 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2012 13:43:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41202 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rxf8q-0006Ej-Ta for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:43:32 -0500 Received: from z.lifelogs.com ([173.255.230.239]:53951) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rxf8k-0006EX-AG for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:43:26 -0500 Received: from heechee (c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [76.28.40.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tzz) by z.lifelogs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8280C6E98A; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:41:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Ted Zlatanov To: Leo Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqdh44e8.fsf__31901.4797722504$1329246706$gmane$org@lifelogs.com> X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:41:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pqdh44e8.fsf__31901.4797722504$1329246706$gmane$org@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:10:55 -0500") Message-ID: <87k43o2oz1.fsf@lifelogs.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10759 Cc: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org, Ding Mailing List X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:10:55 -0500 Ted Zlatanov wrote: TZ> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800 Leo wrote: L> On 2012-02-14 21:20 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >>> Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had >>> its own test directory... L> On 2012-02-14 22:34 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >>> I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git >>> Gnus. :-) L> I think we have what is needed to separate those tests and put them in L> the dedicated folders. What do you think? TZ> Done, correctly I hope. TZ> Ding list: all the registry.el and gnus-registry.el ERT tests are moved TZ> to tests/gnustest-registry.el TZ> Any other tests I should move? I think we're OK now; can I close this bug? Ted From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 15 09:29:35 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2012 14:29:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41236 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfrO-0007Ec-Va for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:29:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52124) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfrD-0007ED-Tk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:29:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfpM-0004zM-MJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:27:32 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:40593) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfpM-0004zI-Ku for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:27:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfpH-00013v-TR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:27:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfpC-0004xo-9I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:27:19 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:37217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfpC-0004xi-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:27:14 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfpA-0002ZF-Nh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:12 +0100 Received: from 123.114.41.200 ([123.114.41.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:12 +0100 Received: from sdl.web by 123.114.41.200 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:12 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Leo Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:27:00 +0800 Lines: 4 Message-ID: References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqdh44e8.fsf__31901.4797722504$1329246706$gmane$org@lifelogs.com> <87k43o2oz1.fsf__44778.4924218014$1329314130$gmane$org@lifelogs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.114.41.200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAG1BMVEUAAAA9Cgm3Hx1WWFWA gn+WmJWsrqv4+vcCAwCRl2MkAAAAAXRSTlMAQObYZgAAAAFiS0dEAIgFHUgAAAAJcEhZcwAAAYoA AAGKATOXMFgAAAAHdElNRQfXAQwDNR+ZJmElAAABIklEQVQoz22SPW+DQAyGWUq65qasd9PNUSX4 AZHK2C1rJy5jpDS4IwRVup9dn7GNafpKIPPgzztXFSujqq1eM2n8h22oMkvxI/i9C97kRfMRUN55 dS3BrsAwBXUtMLAO4lryh8kTjOxKpQNniNxAgZOEe4bZwsDTFhKdqZRLNII4OQNHhEuq/RMkm6Cj TnnEA/fk0BorcYn5qA3oaeAxbaBOLrX+9G48NZ2Fzc2tzDM8Q+tMypEOqYHh8mAWaaK3U/cDMOT5 aMZMABgPXc7zPMs1A8DXO756GFJ/4fMEq47hTsAdn5avoxZ4ywl0c2w4Flu2Ybeyb3S+EqxX2DYA H8veJGEDTnHnrXvRaPyt+2kSfK6rfBZ2tUtfP/mR+pR6sX8BUZ/cDV7tvkoAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CH8uG/GpeYaCFFk/jJzq2r6UWUs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) On 2012-02-15 21:41 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > I think we're OK now; can I close this bug? OK ;) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 16 08:48:00 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2012 13:48:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42362 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry1gl-0000ZW-AV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:48:00 -0500 Received: from z.lifelogs.com ([173.255.230.239]:55170) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry1gj-0000ZO-2o for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:47:57 -0500 Received: from heechee (c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [76.28.40.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tzz) by z.lifelogs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80CB16E98A for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:46:07 -0500 Message-Id: <871upuuc0w.fsf@lifelogs.com> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Teodor Zlatanov Subject: control message for bug #10759 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) close 10759 24.1 From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:55:10 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator