From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, tzz@lifelogs.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 10759 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Stefan Monnier , Ted Zlatanov X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: Stefan Monnier , Ted Zlatanov Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.132867970221193 (code B ref -1); Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:42:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2012 05:41:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59773 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0Hi-0005Vi-Cx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:41:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0Hc-0005VQ-QS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:41:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0GZ-00040h-Ap for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:40:28 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:32768) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0GZ-00040d-7I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:40:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0GY-0004Qm-7y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:40:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0GW-00040T-0n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:40:26 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:38353) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rv0GV-00040O-Sp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:40:23 -0500 Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so453985iag.0 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:40:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:x-debbugs-cc:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=yszsAiENSSU9ZHGy5FmxgfHToqlrMaEKbHdCiz1tWdg=; b=KZPlH4udfAGCxqmOvCF12qx5ND87obJ4Z/SX/exkhkHQa+g7IJBeGa+YLIjljbzcvu EfWPcuSIn6zqcrL5oldbGcUGmfL8O07n8qMQVjSOTfzCb+X53cjIhov/zVyeJlapLFLx 0YT20euMNqRujXH1Bikheid8p07GZgujynbeY= Received: by 10.42.145.131 with SMTP id f3mr30108924icv.8.1328679622711; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from Victoria.local ([119.255.41.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g34sm750037ibk.10.2012.02.07.21.40.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:40:22 -0800 (PST) From: Leo Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:40:07 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) There are ert-deftest littering around in $TOPDIR/lisp/. Could we have all the tests put in TOPDIR/test? Thanks. Leo From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10759 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Cc: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10759-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10759.132915895222668 (code B ref 10759); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:50:01 +0000 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2012 18:49:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39232 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx0xb-0005tY-J1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:49:12 -0500 Received: from z.lifelogs.com ([173.255.230.239]:46113) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx0xa-0005tQ-1b for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:49:10 -0500 Received: from heechee (c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [76.28.40.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tzz) by z.lifelogs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA64966930; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:47:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Ted Zlatanov Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos References: X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:47:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:40:07 +0800") Message-ID: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:40:07 +0800 Leo wrote: L> There are ert-deftest littering around in $TOPDIR/lisp/. L> Could we have all the tests put in TOPDIR/test? Thanks. I've moved the url-future ERT test out to test/automated. Can I close this? Thanks Ted From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10759 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.132918270424721 (code B ref -1); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:26:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 01:25:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39410 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx78h-0006Qg-Nx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:25:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40983) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx78e-0006QC-Sp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:25:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx773-00078Q-QU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:23:22 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:55746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx773-00078M-P4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:23:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx772-0006Sq-TE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:23:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx772-00077u-3V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:23:20 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx771-00077n-Oj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:23:20 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx76y-0006ml-71 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:23:16 +0100 Received: from 119.255.41.67 ([119.255.41.67]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:23:16 +0100 Received: from sdl.web by 119.255.41.67 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:23:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Leo Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:23:00 +0800 Lines: 6 Message-ID: References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 119.255.41.67 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUKDAg1NjRWV1V9fnyg op/DxcLk5uP8/voi63ReAAAACXBIWXMAAAWJAAAFiQFtaJ36AAAAB3RJTUUH1goZAgAz00bgXgAA AeVJREFUKM9lk0Fz2jAQhQXJD3CCO70CmcC1YMtcWyTZ14Bl69xats4N9r6/3zWQBlodNKNPu/s0 b1cCQFuZGpfVVh3vAvBJolIXRkapSuoRUtIdFyo1Y5xSdlAj7OtvD1XnXxmWRi+eWgcxyCed1lVV B1CrKyujMoi+eLA5kU1SsjoHlW+nQjTtFxk4MXgrOxvIqzoTZR8XgPaLl419zgsMaSGFPiUOZCIh thsx5Xy9NsK8Kwf/JoQgMxcVJ301HKkcSWaT0O7FY056J4U9xcYfnmVXG4801lW6lqwu2nKFZoHC HuzvaTVndZ+LaRQgZdthXw1cpynEkLEwyFHXk/aIxNQ6QeooJuzPMB+wn+D7JJNsiCcVA13/A3h/ xE9J+WidpAwoYNmRFwyvSRhNVtsdaAewzZZP5uw82QL9+tyNfocyP0McAzICUr5Mk9RdIjWasUNx aIIt6NK4ZtXIMdfMQt3nuMAyWbLI4DqZ4xPq/ag8jPond4XU/cLuOgw6XCFX/YCUfcDAMMH58fD4 G9kDchwfqVefkBwup2uZM+Q4WhJt5jN3AxXCsaS2yXEDuWgS8VOzW0gFjhEPmLyFMKBFaLb1HRwc DiaKwx0EeTMRYnYPQRW3PP4HApvlMv0PttX5v/D6Aws3IOSEwzmLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lx/egzwaum4JdEYeiDMTMyH/B4g= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) On 2012-02-14 02:47 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > I've moved the url-future ERT test out to test/automated. Can I close this? Thank you for fixing this. Yes, please close it. Leo From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10759 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Cc: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10759-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10759.132918432127191 (code B ref 10759); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:52:02 +0000 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 01:52:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx7Ym-00074V-HS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:52:00 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:42438 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx7Yj-00074N-H9 for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:51:58 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx7XD-0004M7-8H; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:50:23 -0500 From: Glenn Morris References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Spook: freedom Project Monarch high security CIDA PLO ammunition X-Ran: l=x7hP5T:wBMn%A:e_Q}V_;Z1RJI#j+Q\P)I}K=nY!B (Leo's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:23:00 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Leo wrote: > On 2012-02-14 02:47 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> I've moved the url-future ERT test out to test/automated. Can I close this? > > Thank you for fixing this. Yes, please close it. You don't care about the ones in gnus/registry.el, gnus/gnus-registry.el then? :) From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10759 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10759-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10759.132918733531588 (code B ref 10759); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:43:01 +0000 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 02:42:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39449 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx8LO-0008DQ-JU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:42:15 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]:36949) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx8LN-0008DE-41 for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:42:13 -0500 Received: by iagf6 with SMTP id f6so5275768iag.3 for <10759@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:40:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=8UrShn9CBI3c88ZMQekCreI6ibuwGr9ehBxW4ziA0t4=; b=TgOekxhQfUXzqIoCWVxWCupFkGdJPUguL2smpXDQ3Ag5tQwl/SiF3ssVe7P717mxHl R+7ockGWixpp0nd0rmD2aC22MLQ/gde0naDx6fNfie1pBozX4ECxcG/tdQx4NR1UxSRJ CY/s+cNSvFC/w/vIXMiRQaCsTvuAXCQgAeCb0= Received: by 10.50.57.163 with SMTP id j3mr31218930igq.3.1329187233768; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:40:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([119.255.41.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ut1sm23803946igc.2.2012.02.13.18.40.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:40:32 -0800 (PST) From: Leo References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAElBMVEUAAAAAAP+LRRP0pGC+ vr7///+7mT1iAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMO DhglKe4AAAEsSURBVCjPbZNBboQwDEV/Cd4X9QJRThApmn0XYW+Jyf2v0m+HhqDBgiAe9rcTG7QH w/1Vn2Ar8gBb/ocywSN3qK9T3z4eFDB4eApocBpeBs1RSykoJd8gQcm8pGmHXFso3ajnmsqV0TnY DQkOfXUfN5NwaI7AWTVOyEhcu1aHmdWItHddUVUcUgUBCkitu8V6ditHVOVdqzl2EQ1ZVGTbdK0V 7cqn8vWzoU5Q/bF9Y/Y0cRU1xwkys5dJ+Dt6pBDWifcNQml8Gh2JVmPSoQzo7en0grswkxrUGYJ7 0hSxxAGr7ZMwYcHIzprpi7TENEE1xtiYxixRlCfPBsUUrwHD7uGIwATrbnODJcVrPpVn3hxiGloe m/S+z3CtuzUSMo83N4DPH+F0evwR3P4A2k+75838OKQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:40:18 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:50:23 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 2012-02-14 09:50 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: > You don't care about the ones in gnus/registry.el, gnus/gnus-registry.el > then? :) It'd be better to move them to the dedicated test directories too. But gnus is maintained outside Emacs. I don't know what best to do here. Leo From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10759 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Cc: Glenn Morris , 10759@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10759-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10759.132922574329479 (code B ref 10759); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:23:01 +0000 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 13:22:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39782 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxIKt-0007fQ-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:22:23 -0500 Received: from z.lifelogs.com ([173.255.230.239]:37396) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxIKr-0007fJ-Av for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:22:21 -0500 Received: from heechee (c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [76.28.40.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tzz) by z.lifelogs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 986DC7E0F2; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:20:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Ted Zlatanov Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:20:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:40:18 +0800") Message-ID: <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:40:18 +0800 Leo wrote: L> On 2012-02-14 09:50 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: >> You don't care about the ones in gnus/registry.el, gnus/gnus-registry.el >> then? :) L> It'd be better to move them to the dedicated test directories too. But L> gnus is maintained outside Emacs. I don't know what best to do here. Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had its own test directory... Ted From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10759 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Cc: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10759-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10759.132923018516029 (code B ref 10759); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 14:36:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxJUS-0004AP-6H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:36:25 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:56103) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxJUJ-0004A8-Qz for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:36:16 -0500 Received: from 93-41-188-50.ip82.fastwebnet.it ([93.41.188.50] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxJSX-0004HK-VU; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:34:22 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:34:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:20:42 -0500") Message-ID: <87lio5fpqr.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1RxJSX-0004HK-VU X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1329834862.19211@XaJedZyge01Xex4+tlqTlA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Ted Zlatanov writes: > Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had > its own test directory... I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git Gnus. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10759 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13292411753651 (code B ref -1); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:40:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 17:39:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40626 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMLm-0000wp-MN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:39:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37390) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMLk-0000wa-4f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:39:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMK5-0002XH-2S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:37:49 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:55469) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMK5-0002XD-09 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:37:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMJz-0000ED-IR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:37:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMJs-0002W3-SZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:37:43 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49337) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMJs-0002Vp-NS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:37:36 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RxMJn-0006PZ-Om for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:37:31 +0100 Received: from 123.123.251.60 ([123.123.251.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:37:31 +0100 Received: from sdl.web by 123.123.251.60 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:37:31 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Leo Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.123.251.60 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoAgMAAADxkFD+AAAADFBMVEUvT09qWs3/pQD///+J kUVcAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMLOd3veKQA AACuSURBVBjTldE9CgIxEAXgB+lEyFUC2wo5ikdZ8DSypxhMY7H9VuIVwlqkGRgnm59VsHGafIQ3 CZlAtmKIRaHETgYa12lqvEsPYKf8wXHsPGfqPaUM0g9aJPKFXkmNQmSDqwzz4Fpgpz+6WAPY2z5o uPJJpu0uypcl4nyCibMLQ8lCiVjayLoQvw5LsVKQuHPRR958HZbOcVsKeepcLxpByjycGvnKmY+c MBvrtyjfe0vmuLvdq/kAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:khyzvwzEsJJIiCZZu1n167PKsdQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) On 2012-02-14 21:20 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had > its own test directory... > > Ted On 2012-02-14 22:34 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git > Gnus. :-) I think we have what is needed to separate those tests and put them in the dedicated folders. What do you think? Leo From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10759 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo , Ding Mailing List Cc: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10759-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10759.132924676111611 (code B ref 10759); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:13:01 +0000 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2012 19:12:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40637 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxNnq-00031B-E4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:12:40 -0500 Received: from z.lifelogs.com ([173.255.230.239]:51818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxNnm-000311-SY for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:12:36 -0500 Received: from heechee (c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [76.28.40.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tzz) by z.lifelogs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E7A06E983; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:10:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Ted Zlatanov Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:10:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800") Message-ID: <87pqdh44e8.fsf@lifelogs.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800 Leo wrote: L> On 2012-02-14 21:20 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had >> its own test directory... L> On 2012-02-14 22:34 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git >> Gnus. :-) L> I think we have what is needed to separate those tests and put them in L> the dedicated folders. What do you think? Done, correctly I hope. Ding list: all the registry.el and gnus-registry.el ERT tests are moved to tests/gnustest-registry.el Any other tests I should move? Thanks Ted From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10759 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Cc: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org, Ding Mailing List Received: via spool by 10759-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10759.132931341323984 (code B ref 10759); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:44:02 +0000 Received: (at 10759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2012 13:43:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41202 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rxf8q-0006Ej-Ta for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:43:32 -0500 Received: from z.lifelogs.com ([173.255.230.239]:53951) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rxf8k-0006EX-AG for 10759@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:43:26 -0500 Received: from heechee (c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [76.28.40.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tzz) by z.lifelogs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8280C6E98A; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:41:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Ted Zlatanov Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqdh44e8.fsf__31901.4797722504$1329246706$gmane$org@lifelogs.com> X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:41:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pqdh44e8.fsf__31901.4797722504$1329246706$gmane$org@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:10:55 -0500") Message-ID: <87k43o2oz1.fsf@lifelogs.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:10:55 -0500 Ted Zlatanov wrote: TZ> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800 Leo wrote: L> On 2012-02-14 21:20 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >>> Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had >>> its own test directory... L> On 2012-02-14 22:34 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >>> I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git >>> Gnus. :-) L> I think we have what is needed to separate those tests and put them in L> the dedicated folders. What do you think? TZ> Done, correctly I hope. TZ> Ding list: all the registry.el and gnus-registry.el ERT tests are moved TZ> to tests/gnustest-registry.el TZ> Any other tests I should move? I think we're OK now; can I close this bug? Ted From unknown Thu Sep 11 11:56:15 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10759 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 10759@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.132931617527821 (code B ref -1); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:30:03 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2012 14:29:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41236 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfrO-0007Ec-Va for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:29:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52124) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfrD-0007ED-Tk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:29:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfpM-0004zM-MJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:27:32 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:40593) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfpM-0004zI-Ku for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:27:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfpH-00013v-TR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:27:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfpC-0004xo-9I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:27:19 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:37217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfpC-0004xi-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:27:14 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RxfpA-0002ZF-Nh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:12 +0100 Received: from 123.114.41.200 ([123.114.41.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:12 +0100 Received: from sdl.web by 123.114.41.200 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:12 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Leo Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:27:00 +0800 Lines: 4 Message-ID: References: <87k43q3707.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ty2tv9ed.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqdh44e8.fsf__31901.4797722504$1329246706$gmane$org@lifelogs.com> <87k43o2oz1.fsf__44778.4924218014$1329314130$gmane$org@lifelogs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.114.41.200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAG1BMVEUAAAA9Cgm3Hx1WWFWA gn+WmJWsrqv4+vcCAwCRl2MkAAAAAXRSTlMAQObYZgAAAAFiS0dEAIgFHUgAAAAJcEhZcwAAAYoA AAGKATOXMFgAAAAHdElNRQfXAQwDNR+ZJmElAAABIklEQVQoz22SPW+DQAyGWUq65qasd9PNUSX4 AZHK2C1rJy5jpDS4IwRVup9dn7GNafpKIPPgzztXFSujqq1eM2n8h22oMkvxI/i9C97kRfMRUN55 dS3BrsAwBXUtMLAO4lryh8kTjOxKpQNniNxAgZOEe4bZwsDTFhKdqZRLNII4OQNHhEuq/RMkm6Cj TnnEA/fk0BorcYn5qA3oaeAxbaBOLrX+9G48NZ2Fzc2tzDM8Q+tMypEOqYHh8mAWaaK3U/cDMOT5 aMZMABgPXc7zPMs1A8DXO756GFJ/4fMEq47hTsAdn5avoxZ4ywl0c2w4Flu2Ybeyb3S+EqxX2DYA H8veJGEDTnHnrXvRaPyt+2kSfK6rfBZ2tUtfP/mR+pR6sX8BUZ/cDV7tvkoAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CH8uG/GpeYaCFFk/jJzq2r6UWUs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) On 2012-02-15 21:41 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > I think we're OK now; can I close this bug? OK ;) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 16 08:48:00 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2012 13:48:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42362 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry1gl-0000ZW-AV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:48:00 -0500 Received: from z.lifelogs.com ([173.255.230.239]:55170) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry1gj-0000ZO-2o for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:47:57 -0500 Received: from heechee (c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net [76.28.40.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tzz) by z.lifelogs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80CB16E98A for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:46:07 -0500 Message-Id: <871upuuc0w.fsf@lifelogs.com> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Teodor Zlatanov Subject: control message for bug #10759 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) close 10759 24.1