GNU bug report logs - #10759
23.4; Move url-future-test to test/

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 10759 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 10759 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:40:07 +0800

There are ert-deftest littering around in $TOPDIR/lisp/.

Could we have all the tests put in TOPDIR/test? Thanks.

Leo

Message #8 received at 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz <at> lifelogs.com>
To: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:47:36 -0500

On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:40:07 +0800 Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com> wrote: 

L> There are ert-deftest littering around in $TOPDIR/lisp/.
L> Could we have all the tests put in TOPDIR/test? Thanks.

I've moved the url-future ERT test out to test/automated.  Can I close this?

Thanks
Ted

Message #11 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:23:00 +0800

On 2012-02-14 02:47 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> I've moved the url-future ERT test out to test/automated.  Can I close this?

Thank you for fixing this. Yes, please close it.

Leo

Message #14 received at 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:50:23 -0500

Leo wrote:

> On 2012-02-14 02:47 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> I've moved the url-future ERT test out to test/automated.  Can I close this?
>
> Thank you for fixing this. Yes, please close it.

You don't care about the ones in gnus/registry.el, gnus/gnus-registry.el
then? :)

Message #17 received at 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:40:18 +0800

On 2012-02-14 09:50 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote:
> You don't care about the ones in gnus/registry.el, gnus/gnus-registry.el
> then? :)

It'd be better to move them to the dedicated test directories too. But
gnus is maintained outside Emacs. I don't know what best to do here.

Leo

Message #20 received at 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz <at> lifelogs.com>
To: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>, 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:20:42 -0500

On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:40:18 +0800 Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com> wrote: 

L> On 2012-02-14 09:50 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote:
>> You don't care about the ones in gnus/registry.el, gnus/gnus-registry.el
>> then? :)

L> It'd be better to move them to the dedicated test directories too. But
L> gnus is maintained outside Emacs. I don't know what best to do here.

Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are.  Perhaps if Gnus had
its own test directory...

Ted

Message #23 received at 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:34:20 +0100

Ted Zlatanov <tzz <at> lifelogs.com> writes:

> Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are.  Perhaps if Gnus had
> its own test directory...

I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git
Gnus.  :-)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no  *  Sent from my Rome

Message #26 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800

On 2012-02-14 21:20 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are.  Perhaps if Gnus had
> its own test directory...
>
> Ted

On 2012-02-14 22:34 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git
> Gnus.  :-)

I think we have what is needed to separate those tests and put them in
the dedicated folders. What do you think?

Leo

Message #29 received at 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz <at> lifelogs.com>
To: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>, Ding Mailing List <ding <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:10:55 -0500

On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800 Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com> wrote: 

L> On 2012-02-14 21:20 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are.  Perhaps if Gnus had
>> its own test directory...

L> On 2012-02-14 22:34 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>> I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git
>> Gnus.  :-)

L> I think we have what is needed to separate those tests and put them in
L> the dedicated folders. What do you think?

Done, correctly I hope.

Ding list: all the registry.el and gnus-registry.el ERT tests are moved
to tests/gnustest-registry.el

Any other tests I should move?

Thanks
Ted

Message #32 received at 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz <at> lifelogs.com>
To: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 10759 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ding Mailing List <ding <at> gnus.org>
Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:41:38 -0500

On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:10:55 -0500 Ted Zlatanov <tzz <at> lifelogs.com> wrote: 

TZ> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800 Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com> wrote: 
L> On 2012-02-14 21:20 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>>> Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are.  Perhaps if Gnus had
>>> its own test directory...

L> On 2012-02-14 22:34 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>>> I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git
>>> Gnus.  :-)

L> I think we have what is needed to separate those tests and put them in
L> the dedicated folders. What do you think?

TZ> Done, correctly I hope.

TZ> Ding list: all the registry.el and gnus-registry.el ERT tests are moved
TZ> to tests/gnustest-registry.el

TZ> Any other tests I should move?

I think we're OK now; can I close this bug?

Ted

Message #35 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:27:00 +0800

On 2012-02-15 21:41 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> I think we're OK now; can I close this bug?

OK ;)

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.