From unknown Sat Aug 16 11:11:08 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#10712 <10712@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#10712 <10712@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: $MANPATH is ignored by man.el Reply-To: bug#10712 <10712@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 18:11:08 +0000 retitle 10712 $MANPATH is ignored by man.el reassign 10712 emacs submitter 10712 jidanni@jidanni.org severity 10712 wishlist thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 03 12:51:19 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2012 17:51:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52537 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtNI6-0007R5-Sk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:51:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtNI5-0007Qs-9p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:51:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtNHR-0007g4-OE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:50:38 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:43113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtNHR-0007g0-MB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:50:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52865) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtNHQ-0004E1-Cf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:50:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtNHM-0007fb-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:50:36 -0500 Received: from caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.145]:35754 helo=homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtNHM-0007fO-0M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:50:32 -0500 Received: from homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B387E25C064 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:50:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=jidanni.org ; b=N3+mtZFI0TWB8yL6JNs/GUcYpeilNfSg6qf0CD3IeGXvQ4fVWaSlBmTlPVgV OORVvDSI1cmmVKsNJ6Zj5Odj0dxJXI+ymPoptnkqFePyaM8RxrSNQHslqSvdAZ/C 0fzSWuxCX3aV3cGSfoITe3xfx101i6U/9w2h4F/P6t94rgk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= jidanni.org; bh=HV6FoZU6/Ezgg6NWh8wKdCx4FY0=; b=o/hf6NOnRQFXxIOY ytfj1UE6TZfSigqAXrvaNOAKSHU8yj+nD7xl1xcQhuukjTTS5jrh0DpxxVZE+3nY FmJn16jQjCZfjzm1+DTwiiDSaKP2ApEnwgcV+T0IIzX5iyOTmO1uN49XHX+h7E3H 1ehCP5oCzStPOKSCyq7Mmafuz4M= Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-17-179.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.17.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67A2925C062 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:50:29 -0800 (PST) From: jidanni@jidanni.org To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: $MANPATH is ignored by man.el Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:17:17 +0800 Message-ID: <87liokt08y.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) When prompting for a man page, man.el doesn't offer completions for all the names that it indeed can successfully find. E.g., though (man "Algorithm::GooglePolylineEncoding") works fine, you won't get any help typing it in using TAB completion. That's because $MANPATH is ignored by man.el. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 03 16:09:45 2012 Received: (at 10712) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2012 21:09:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52754 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtQO8-00040N-IZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:09:45 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51906 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtQO6-00040G-8q for 10712@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:09:42 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtQNX-0005GX-2D; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:09:07 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 10712@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#10712: $MANPATH is ignored by man.el References: <87liokt08y.fsf@jidanni.org> X-Spook: infowar Aladdin Lexis-Nexis data haven UOP Project X-Ran: _n6%_EyM%KIXC9%}9V/a0f":):5T7Dv~0_1,HK(OKc\8&0}-dK/6K!Fc:R^iFa(R[bU@YS X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:09:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87liokt08y.fsf@jidanni.org> (jidanni@jidanni.org's message of "Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:17:17 +0800") Message-ID: <9ur4ybeia5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10712 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) jidanni@jidanni.org wrote: > That's because $MANPATH is ignored by man.el. It uses man -k (aka apropos). Presumably your MANPATH includes things that are not in your system's apropos database. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 03 16:20:20 2012 Received: (at 10712) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2012 21:20:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtQYO-0004Gi-2b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:20:20 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52159 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtQYL-0004Ga-Pg for 10712@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:20:18 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtQXm-0000X8-Ht; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:19:42 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 10712@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#10712: $MANPATH is ignored by man.el References: <87liokt08y.fsf@jidanni.org> <9ur4ybeia5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spook: e-bomb unclassified PET Defcon SCUD missile terrorism X-Ran: !\(0^8%[`d"">L=nS+$}B*)UI!5]p@yLZ*qA>Z11J%33j3`48xD>e**OJ36bwfUt8v*?/d X-Hue: yellow X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:19:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <9ur4ybeia5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:09:06 -0500") Message-ID: <16y5sjwr69.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10712 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Glenn Morris wrote: > It uses man -k (aka apropos). bash_completion, on the other hand, does stat directories from `man --path', and it's always seemed fast enough to me. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 06 08:37:50 2012 Received: (at 10712) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2012 13:37:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56494 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuOlS-0001v2-0k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:37:50 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:62118) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuOlP-0001uq-Fs for 10712@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:37:48 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAJLWL09MCqD0/2dsb2JhbABDrziBBoFyAQEEAVYjEAsOJhIUGA0kiA+5BYwOEgICAwYCBAIBBAICDAYKAQIBhB0BBAQegzkEiESJBpF9hFo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,370,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="161427812" Received: from 76-10-160-244.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.160.244]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 06 Feb 2012 08:36:51 -0500 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8D85B58C8C; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:36:51 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#10712: $MANPATH is ignored by man.el Message-ID: References: <87liokt08y.fsf@jidanni.org> <9ur4ybeia5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <16y5sjwr69.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:36:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <16y5sjwr69.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:19:42 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10712 Cc: 10712@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) >> It uses man -k (aka apropos). > bash_completion, on the other hand, does stat directories from > `man --path', and it's always seemed fast enough to me. There's no particularly strong reason why we use "man -k" other than "that's what I started with". So if you want to change that (after 24.1), that's fine, tho I think it's important to make sure it still works on macosx. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 07 06:22:59 2020 Received: (at 10712) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2020 10:22:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55813 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3zWd-0002vF-9j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:22:59 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37640) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3zWa-0002uv-Bl for 10712@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:22:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aomx6u4PWaoDgMcIQ/SCZKYVMQ1ZjS+x1bb1jbxXwec=; b=NxGkZ1RvzUFglo/4xhQ9PNJfl/ bMCkqOveM9Cx4jE9RZj3cTEVwFnXkXqNsFs+Rw0amqlywRp/MMxsOnlj8Qvdis9rSkT/4DF9e8zrX HLSQ48pFdcLpeZXwz9UWjMvtTuXG7sEUnWyJlAl3/YAKbge6oAJzRpIhTq1DuCzo27vI=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k3zWL-0005sE-6Q; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 12:22:50 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: jidanni@jidanni.org Subject: Re: bug#10712: $MANPATH is ignored by man.el References: <87liokt08y.fsf@jidanni.org> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 12:22:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87liokt08y.fsf@jidanni.org> (jidanni@jidanni.org's message of "Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:17:17 +0800") Message-ID: <87tuxe4uxc.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > When prompting for a man page, man.el doesn't offer completions for all > the names that it indeed can successfully find. > > E.g., though > (man "Algorithm::GooglePolylineEncoding") > works fine, > [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10712 Cc: 10712@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > When prompting for a man page, man.el doesn't offer completions for all > the names that it indeed can successfully find. > > E.g., though > (man "Algorithm::GooglePolylineEncoding") > works fine, > you won't get any help typing it in using TAB completion. > > That's because $MANPATH is ignored by man.el. This was reported eight years ago, but when I try, say, `M-x man RET Xt TAB', I get completions like XTestCompareCurrentCursorWithWindow(3) XTestCompareCursorWithWindow(3) XTestDiscard(3) XTestFakeButtonEvent(3) XTestFakeKeyEvent(3) XTestFakeMotionEvent(3) XTestFakeRelativeMotionEvent(3) XTestGrabControl(3) XTestQueryExtension(3) XTestSetGContextOfGC(3) XTestSetVisualIDOfVisual(3) XtAddActions(3) XtAddCallback(3) XtAddCallbacks(3) XtAddConverter(3) XtAddEventHandler(3) XtAddExposureToRegion(3) XtAddGrab(3) So I'm guessing that this has been fixed at some point, and I'm closing this bug report. If you're still seeing this, please reopen. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 07 06:23:07 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2020 10:23:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3zWl-0002wI-Ge for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:23:07 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37654) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3zWj-0002vN-5X for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 06:23:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=AfK1tHHcfWLDQ1Ii67KPQgomVksMYFyIl/jBWoFumFM=; b=GEcWKjy1xWlja4yTyaAD6MEQ4l nFE3PEP1SMmgGzJbJ7KsogGh3hoGppavRuaNSAHGV8kqUUIM0SNGNo5FoSLFSYHusfEBPZHGt9vIQ DzEVciHpJqhBFWvKGCBa/FOFdQTmUpjdXmedZZ8OGUSJo4um0wICi4u3rhweHRHYhwWs=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k3zWb-0005sV-FR for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 12:22:59 +0200 Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 12:22:56 +0200 Message-Id: <87sgcy4uwv.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #10712 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 10712 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 10712 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 09 02:25:32 2020 Received: (at 10712) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2020 06:25:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59870 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4elw-0003bM-AH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 02:25:32 -0400 Received: from guinea.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.79]:48325) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4elu-0003bE-JK for 10712@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 02:25:31 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC51181831 for <10712@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 06:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a49.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-19-29.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.19.29]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0E300181833 for <10712@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 06:25:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a49.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.8); Sun, 09 Aug 2020 06:25:29 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Wiry-Little: 0052e0be2ab21f63_1596954329090_3415864419 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1596954329090:1709636074 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1596954329090 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a49.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a49.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907C48001D for <10712@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 23:25:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=hP9/jJSsOJLe6cqXl0cgVYmeK+A=; b=S/HoFSZfBt5RI Vhy98Qzdk95QykzPUAfTbHycEjltVpAffp78GwfVeA75celull8OJjhbZgWLdrVw CH0T9sGVckaECLRpdXnlPRir6mJ2fygaNA4Z8YRTSng+KUI6MamPq6PcbwViZbKF yEu3vJx9mm6kedg60FhMyEoXQeQhdc= Received: from jidanni.org (1-170-83-7.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [1.170.83.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a49.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9860F80013 for <10712@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 23:25:25 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a49 From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson To: 10712@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#10712: $MANPATH is ignored by man.el References: <87liokt08y.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tuxe4uxc.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 13:46:04 +0800 Message-ID: <87sgcwid7n.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0 X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrkeehgddutdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufhffkfggtgesthdtredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepnjjnnjcuffgrnhculfgrtghosghsohhnuceojhhiuggrnhhnihesjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfeuhfeufefgvdekudehteetffffhfetkeegleegteduvdelvdeiffelvefhiedtnecukfhppedurddujedtrdekfedrjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehjihgurghnnhhirdhorhhgpdhinhgvthepuddrudejtddrkeefrdejpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpeeprehuthhfqdekreeureehiehmpfehnfhiheehsgevkeerpecuffgrnhculfgrtghosghsohhnuceojhhiuggrnhhnihesjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrgheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepjhhiuggrnhhnihesjhhiuggrnhhnihdrohhrghdpnhhrtghpthhtohepuddtjeduvdesuggvsggsuhhgshdrghhnuhdrohhrgh X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10712 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Yes, seems fixed now. From unknown Sat Aug 16 11:11:08 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator