Package: coreutils;
Reported by: "Wang, YuanTao" <ytwang <at> freewheel.tv>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 17:06:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: notabug
Done: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
View this message in rfc822 format
From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu> Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: bug#10699: closed (bug of `date`: why 1/1/2012 is the second week of 2012?) Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:32:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: "Wang, YuanTao" <ytwang <at> freewheel.tv> To: "bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org" <bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org> Subject: bug of `date`: why 1/1/2012 is the second week of 2012? Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 02:25:59 -0600[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)][Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu> To: "Wang, YuanTao" <ytwang <at> freewheel.tv> Cc: 10699-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#10699: bug of `date`: why 1/1/2012 is the second week of 2012? Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:30:53 -0800
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.