From unknown Fri Jun 20 05:37:03 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#10681 <10681@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#10681 <10681@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Reply-To: bug#10681 <10681@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:37:03 +0000 retitle 10681 GNU Guile 2.0.5 released reassign 10681 guile submitter 10681 Hans Aberg severity 10681 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 09:22:52 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 14:22:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46549 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbj-0001fs-Vl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbh-0001fg-UZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbH-0006qe-Gk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:29 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:60358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbH-0006qW-Bw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:32932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbB-0005o6-0h for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEb5-0006pP-4R for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:16 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:33530) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEav-0006nk-Mn; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:01 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E0087B284; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:59 +0100 Subject: Re: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:57 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guile bug X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) On 30 Jan 2012, at 23:02, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.0.5. The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler = i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: PASS: test-asmobs bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 /bin/sh: line 1: 96687 Bus error: 10 srcdir=3D"." builddir=3D"."= CHARSETALIASDIR=3D"/usr/local/src/guile/guile-2.0.5/lib" = GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=3D0 "../../meta/uninstalled-env" ${dir}$tst ... =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1 of 28 tests failed Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Done. Hans From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 09:40:53 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 14:40:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEtA-00024i-Kt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:40:53 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:52802 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEt4-00024W-Bf for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:40:50 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECB87D75; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:40:29 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=fGHV9dth7nomzpRtHjWZyoBLb9o=; b=I42tzz U9Ar45tgMaUPUV+r62ovVhp7VatZAfH7qQ5V5HeOnXL/GFLxxdj6WjgxfC+GT+9a Z2L1WJJq6imn8tiZaxwBAK+CNz0dvsJQGcCTUI9+rzZ+8LzXTfW1awXraxPXDVd0 7I0mfXctWvot53ioC+JrTm41vW1Zrb+QgwPbQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Sq+2JKoYw1BnGP6z9WJ1VMJOny/LnP2T HbgtG2hAJBzaFtIrWEDd3c3RF/2KGy5LwfYh6qBPBNm3f+utUmJzuh1rfA22hB8a rR5ZEFY13XcTynNCZZkvVc3EfMrfDNdWNvqb/z7YkLMORsp4IE/obbxKqdpkgV+a lMlfFIe0dmU= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76907D74; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:40:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [85.50.103.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F7FC7D73; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:40:29 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo To: Hans Aberg Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:40:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:57 +0100") Message-ID: <87fwewue93.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 85700B7A-4C19-11E1-B813-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30122 -- http://wingolog.org/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 10:05:30 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 15:05:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47374 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFGz-0002oR-L4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:05:30 -0500 Received: from smtp-out21.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.208]:60849) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFGw-0002oD-J2 for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:05:28 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out21.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EC0B93A01D2F4B6; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:05:00 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87fwewue93.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:04:58 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87fwewue93.fsf@pobox.com> To: Andy Wingo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) On 31 Jan 2012, at 15:40, Andy Wingo wrote: > https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30122 I used /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2, which is different from clang. There is also this one http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2011-11/msg00026.html It asks for this output: $ grep scm_t_int8 libguile/scmconfig.h typedef int8_t scm_t_int8; It is the same with gcc-4.7.0. Hans From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 10:19:23 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 15:19:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47384 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFUR-00038D-22 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:19:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38121) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFUN-000380-Ix for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:19:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFTx-0002P5-W0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:18:58 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:58470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFTx-0002P1-Uc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:18:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58567) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFTw-000495-Kn for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:18:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFTl-0002Jh-Fq for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:18:52 -0500 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:38986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFTl-0002JU-9O for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:18:41 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,596,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="142227890" Received: from unknown (HELO pluto) ([193.50.110.167]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 31 Jan 2012 16:18:40 +0100 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) To: Hans Aberg Subject: Re: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 12 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pluvi=F4se?= an 220 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:18:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:57 +0100") Message-ID: <87ty3bj3xs.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guile bug X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Hi Hans, Hans Aberg skribis: > The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler i686= -apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: What is this? Apple=E2=80=99s GCC? DragonEgg? FWIW, this problem doesn=E2=80=99t show up on , which uses Apple=E2=80=99s = GCC 4.2.1 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 12:00:26 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 17:00:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH48-0005Ro-VJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:00:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40121) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH45-0005Rc-Mw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:00:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH3j-0001Mt-1N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:59:56 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:33260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH3i-0001Mh-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:59:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH3Y-0002Yv-Gu for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:59:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH3J-0001Bi-JY for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:59:44 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:39744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH39-00016R-Mh; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:59:19 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E0088A201; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:59:16 +0100 Subject: Re: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87ty3bj3xs.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:59:15 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0A510EAC-5890-4742-82A2-66655FE5F14F@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87ty3bj3xs.fsf@gnu.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guile bug X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) On 31 Jan 2012, at 16:18, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: >> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler = i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: >=20 > What is this? Apple=92s GCC? DragonEgg? On OS X 10.7.2, Xcode 4.2 installs two system compilers /usr/bin/clang /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 It is the latter, because that is one gets hold of without 'export = CC=3D...'. > FWIW, this problem doesn=92t show up on > , which uses Apple=92s = GCC > 4.2.1 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0. I get another error with gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 (from SVN, installed in = /usr/local/bin/gcc): PASS: test-asmobs /bin/sh: line 1: 33654 Bus error: 10 srcdir=3D"." builddir=3D"."= CHARSETALIASDIR=3D"/usr/local/src/guile/gcc-4.7/guile-2.0.5/lib" = GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=3D0 "../../meta/uninstalled-env" ${dir}$tst FAIL: test-ffi PASS: test-list ... =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1 of 28 tests failed Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D So the f-sum error seems to have to do with llvm-gcc (and possibly = clang). In both cases, the failure is FAIL: test-ffi Hans From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 13:06:11 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 18:06:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47536 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsI5q-0000D3-MU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:06:11 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:36077 ident=hope4) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsI5o-0000Ct-4R for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:06:09 -0500 Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsI5S-0003nH-JL; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:05:46 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver To: Hans Aberg Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:04:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:57 +0100") Message-ID: <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hans Aberg writes: > The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler > i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: > > PASS: test-asmobs > bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to be of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently being interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm guessing that this is libffi's job. Hans: can you please verify that your libffi's 'make check' passes all tests on your platform? If it passes, and if this ends up being a different build of 'libffi' than you were previously using, it would be helpful if you could install the newly-built 'libffi', then do a fresh rebuild of Guile 2.0.5 and see if that fixes the problem. Thanks, Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 14:30:44 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 19:30:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47604 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJPf-0002CX-P9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:30:44 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:49256) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJPd-0002CF-UW for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:30:43 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E00895010; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:30:04 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:30:03 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> To: Mark H Weaver X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 31 Jan 2012, at 19:04, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler >> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: >>=20 >> PASS: test-asmobs >> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >=20 > I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to be > of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently = being > interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its > promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm = guessing > that this is libffi's job. It is broken (libffi from GIT, the only that works on OX 10.7): $ make check Making check in include make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'. Making check in testsuite make check-DEJAGNU srcdir=3D`CDPATH=3D"${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd ../../libffi/testsuite && = pwd`; export srcdir; \ EXPECT=3D`if [ -f ../../expect/expect ] ; then echo = ../../expect/expect ; else echo expect ; fi`; export EXPECT; \ runtest=3D`if [ -f ../../libffi/../dejagnu/runtest ] ; then echo = ../../libffi/../dejagnu/runtest ; else echo runtest; fi`; \ if /bin/sh -c "$runtest --version" > /dev/null 2>&1; then \ exit_status=3D0; l=3D'libffi'; for tool in $l; do \ if $runtest --tool $tool --srcdir $srcdir ; \ then :; else exit_status=3D1; fi; \ done; \ else echo "WARNING: could not find \`runtest'" 1>&2; :;\ fi; \ exit $exit_status WARNING: could not find `runtest' Making check in man make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'. make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check-am' > Hans: can you please verify that your libffi's 'make check' passes all > tests on your platform? If it passes, and if this ends up being a > different build of 'libffi' than you were previously using, it would = be > helpful if you could install the newly-built 'libffi', then do a fresh > rebuild of Guile 2.0.5 and see if that fixes the problem. I have installed the newly built libffi, but rebuilding guile takes a = lot of time. Hans From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 14:36:54 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 19:36:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47610 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJVd-0002Kk-Gx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:36:54 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:52576 ident=hope6) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJVb-0002Kc-3M for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:36:52 -0500 Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJVF-00047a-5j; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:36:29 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver To: Hans Aberg Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:35:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:30:03 +0100") Message-ID: <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hans Aberg writes: > On 31 Jan 2012, at 19:04, Mark H Weaver wrote: > >>> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler >>> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: >>> >>> PASS: test-asmobs >>> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >> >> I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to be >> of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently being >> interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its >> promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm guessing >> that this is libffi's job. > > It is broken (libffi from GIT, the only that works on OX 10.7): You need to install DejaGnu in order to run libffi's test suite. Thanks, Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 14:42:24 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 19:42:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47614 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJax-0002Ug-Og for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:42:23 -0500 Received: from smtp-out21.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.208]:51861) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJau-0002UR-5w for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:42:21 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out21.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EC0B93A01D4D396; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:41:44 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:41:41 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <123B4371-B3AD-4732-8A10-0E2748450574@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> To: Mark H Weaver X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 31 Jan 2012, at 20:35, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>>> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the = compiler >>>> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode = 4.2.1: >>>>=20 >>>> PASS: test-asmobs >>>> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >>>=20 >>> I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to = be >>> of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently = being >>> interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its >>> promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm = guessing >>> that this is libffi's job. >>=20 >> It is broken (libffi from GIT, the only that works on OX 10.7): >=20 > You need to install DejaGnu in order to run libffi's test suite. > OK. I am rebuilding Guile. Stay tuned. Hans From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 15:02:17 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 20:02:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47621 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJuD-0002wn-ER for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:02:17 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:40908) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJuB-0002wc-Ec for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:02:16 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E00897415; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:01:39 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:01:37 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6770CBE1-3793-4714-A6BA-2BFE20A77113@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> To: Mark H Weaver X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 31 Jan 2012, at 20:35, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>>> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the = compiler >>>> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode = 4.2.1: >>>>=20 >>>> PASS: test-asmobs >>>> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >>>=20 >>> I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to = be >>> of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently = being >>> interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its >>> promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm = guessing >>> that this is libffi's job. >>=20 >> It is broken (libffi from GIT, the only that works on OX 10.7): >=20 > You need to install DejaGnu in order to run libffi's test suite. > It seem they passed (not giving any details). Hans Test Run on Tue Jan 31 20:51:33 2012 Native configuration is x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0 =3D=3D=3D libffi tests =3D=3D=3D Schedule of variations: unix Running target unix Using /usr/local/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description = file for target. Using /usr/local/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file = for target. Using /usr/local/src/libffi/git/libffi/testsuite/config/default.exp as = tool-and-target-specific interface file. Running /usr/local/src/libffi/git/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/call.exp = ... Running = /usr/local/src/libffi/git/libffi/testsuite/libffi.special/special.exp = ... =3D=3D=3D libffi Summary =3D=3D=3D # of expected passes 1659 # of unsupported tests 15 Making check in man make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'. make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 17:03:26 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 22:03:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47718 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsLnR-0007IY-Nj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:03:26 -0500 Received: from smtp-out11.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.200]:53564) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsLnP-0007IL-I5 for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:03:24 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out11.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC3D3500BE7729; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:02:45 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:02:43 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <97851F48-92D8-4547-94F0-4945FCE74679@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> To: Mark H Weaver X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 31 Jan 2012, at 20:35, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>>> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the = compiler >>>> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode = 4.2.1: >>>>=20 >>>> PASS: test-asmobs >>>> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >>>=20 >>> I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to = be >>> of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently = being >>> interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its >>> promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm = guessing >>> that this is libffi's job. >>=20 >> It is broken (libffi from GIT, the only that works on OX 10.7): >=20 > You need to install DejaGnu in order to run libffi's test suite. > With gcc-4.7.0 (from SVN), the test-ffi test now passes (libffi from = GIT), but I get three other failures. The compiler that is normally used on the system, is llvm-gcc-4.2, and = its compile is still running. Hans Running bytevectors.test FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: = bytevector-sint-ref [small] (eval) FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: = bytevector-sint-ref [small] (compile) ... Running gc.test FAIL: gc.test: gc: Unused modules are removed ... Totals for this test run: passes: 34886 failures: 3 unexpected passes: 0 expected failures: 30 unresolved test cases: 29 untested test cases: 1 unsupported test cases: 9 errors: 0 FAIL: check-guile =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1 of 1 test failed Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 20:34:59 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 01:34:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47869 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsP6A-0004Wm-KB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:34:59 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:51003) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsP67-0004WV-UU for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:34:57 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E008A3760; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:34:17 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:34:18 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> To: Mark H Weaver X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 31 Jan 2012, at 20:35, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>>> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the = compiler >>>> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode = 4.2.1: >>>>=20 >>>> PASS: test-asmobs >>>> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >>>=20 >>> I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to = be >>> of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently = being >>> interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its >>> promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm = guessing >>> that this is libffi's job. >>=20 >> It is broken (libffi from GIT, the only that works on OX 10.7): >=20 > You need to install DejaGnu in order to run libffi's test suite. > After doing this, the same failure with the LLVM-GCC compiler: /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 This is the compiler that one will use on OS X 10.7 if one installs = Xcode 4.2.1, and is not setting the compiler explicitly (or overriding = by another install). Hans PASS: test-asmobs bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 FAIL: test-ffi ... =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1 of 28 tests failed Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 20:44:24 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 01:44:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPFI-0004lV-26 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:44:24 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:40759 ident=hope4) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPFE-0004lM-Eb for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:44:21 -0500 Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPEp-0005R2-NT; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:43:56 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver To: Hans Aberg Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <97851F48-92D8-4547-94F0-4945FCE74679@telia.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:42:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <97851F48-92D8-4547-94F0-4945FCE74679@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:02:43 +0100") Message-ID: <87pqdze3c0.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hans Aberg writes: > With gcc-4.7.0 (from SVN), the test-ffi test now passes (libffi from > GIT) Excellent! I guess that this was a libffi bug. > but I get three other failures. > > The compiler that is normally used on the system, is llvm-gcc-4.2, and > its compile is still running. Please let us know the results of 'make check' when compiling with llvm-gcc-4.2. I'm especially curious to hear whether the bytevector tests fail with that compiler as well. > Running bytevectors.test > FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: bytevector-sint-ref [small] (eval) > FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: bytevector-sint-ref [small] (compile) In the directory where you built using GCC-4.7.0 (SVN), can you please apply the following 'patch for bytevectors.test' and then, from the guile-2.0.5 directory, run: ./check-guile bytevectors.test and show us the output? This is a shot in the dark, but I've also attached a patch that _might_ fix the bytevector problem. After applying it, it should be sufficient to simply run "make" again, and it shouldn't take long. Let us know! Thanks, Mark --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=BYTE_SWAP_TEST_HELP.patch Content-Description: Patch for bytevectors.test (to help diagnose) diff --git a/test-suite/tests/bytevectors.test b/test-suite/tests/bytevectors.test index 3007434..b652935 100644 --- a/test-suite/tests/bytevectors.test +++ b/test-suite/tests/bytevectors.test @@ -114,10 +114,14 @@ #xfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffd))) (pass-if "bytevector-sint-ref [small]" - (let ((b (u8-list->bytevector '(#xff #xf0 #xff)))) - (equal? (bytevector-sint-ref b 0 (endianness big) 2) - (bytevector-sint-ref b 1 (endianness little) 2) - -16))) + (let* ((b (u8-list->bytevector '(#xff #xf0 #xff))) + (be-result (bytevector-sint-ref b 0 (endianness big) 2)) + (le-result (bytevector-sint-ref b 1 (endianness little) 2))) + (or (equal? be-result le-result -16) + (begin (format (current-error-port) + "bytevector-sint-ref [small] failure: ~S ~S~%" + be-result le-result) + #f)))) (pass-if "bytevector-sint-ref [large]" (let ((b (make-bytevector 50))) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=BYTE_SWAP_FIX.patch Content-Description: A shot in the dark (possible fix) diff --git a/libguile/bytevectors.c b/libguile/bytevectors.c index fff5355..8574a36 100644 --- a/libguile/bytevectors.c +++ b/libguile/bytevectors.c @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ \ memcpy (&c_result, &c_bv[c_index], (_len) / 8); \ if (!scm_is_eq (endianness, scm_i_native_endianness)) \ - c_result = INT_SWAP (_len) (c_result); \ + c_result = (INT_TYPE (_len, _sign)) INT_SWAP (_len) ((INT_TYPE (_len, unsigned)) c_result); \ \ result = SCM_I_MAKINUM (c_result); \ } \ @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ \ c_value_short = (INT_TYPE (_len, _sign)) c_value; \ if (!scm_is_eq (endianness, scm_i_native_endianness)) \ - c_value_short = INT_SWAP (_len) (c_value_short); \ + c_value_short = (INT_TYPE (_len, _sign)) INT_SWAP (_len) ((INT_TYPE (_len, unsigned)) c_value_short); \ \ memcpy (&c_bv[c_index], &c_value_short, (_len) / 8); \ } \ @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ bytevector_large_set (char *c_bv, size_t c_size, int signed_p, INT_TYPE (16, _sign) c_value16; \ memcpy (&c_value16, c_bv, 2); \ if (swap) \ - value = (INT_TYPE (16, _sign)) bswap_16 (c_value16); \ + value = (INT_TYPE (16, _sign)) bswap_16 ((scm_t_uint16) c_value16); \ else \ value = c_value16; \ } \ @@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ bytevector_unsigned_ref (const char *c_bv, size_t c_size, SCM endianness) swap = !scm_is_eq (endianness, scm_i_native_endianness); \ \ if (swap) \ - c_value16 = (INT_TYPE (16, _sign)) bswap_16 (c_value); \ + c_value16 = (INT_TYPE (16, _sign)) bswap_16 ((scm_t_uint16) c_value); \ else \ c_value16 = c_value; \ \ --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 20:50:35 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 01:50:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47877 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPLG-0004tx-St for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:35 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:37567 ident=hope1) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPLE-0004tp-Lz for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:33 -0500 Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPKr-0005Rz-HZ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:09 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver To: Hans Aberg Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:49:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:34:18 +0100") Message-ID: <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hans Aberg writes: > After doing this, the same failure with the LLVM-GCC compiler: > /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 > /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 > i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 > > This is the compiler that one will use on OS X 10.7 if one installs > Xcode 4.2.1, and is not setting the compiler explicitly (or overriding > by another install). > > Hans > > > PASS: test-asmobs > bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 > FAIL: test-ffi Are you sure this guile was linked against your newly-built 'libffi'? Your previously reported results (using GCC 4.7.0 from SVN) seemed to suggest a bug in an earlier version of 'libffi' that has since been fixed in their development tree. Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 01 04:19:29 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 09:19:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWLg-0008Bf-Af for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:19:29 -0500 Received: from smtp-out11.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.200]:58602) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWLc-0008BS-Th for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:19:26 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out11.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC3D3500C06BD4; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:18:46 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:18:48 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> To: Mark H Weaver X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 1 Feb 2012, at 02:49, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> After doing this, the same failure with the LLVM-GCC compiler: >> /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 >> /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 >> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 >>=20 >> This is the compiler that one will use on OS X 10.7 if one installs >> Xcode 4.2.1, and is not setting the compiler explicitly (or = overriding >> by another install). >>=20 >> Hans >>=20 >>=20 >> PASS: test-asmobs >> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >> FAIL: test-ffi >=20 > Are you sure this guile was linked against your newly-built 'libffi'? Yes, I compiled it with llvm-gcc, and installed it. All new compiles = were made out of the source directory. > Your previously reported results (using GCC 4.7.0 from SVN) seemed to > suggest a bug in an earlier version of 'libffi' that has since been > fixed in their development tree. It suggests that problem is with llvm-gcc (an clang), I think. With = gcc-4.7 there is no libffi failure. Hans From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 01 04:36:09 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 09:36:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48201 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWbp-00007G-7l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:36:09 -0500 Received: from smtp-out11.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.200]:47116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWbn-000074-30 for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:36:07 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out11.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC3D3500C093A1; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:35:28 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87pqdze3c0.fsf@netris.org> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:35:30 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <97851F48-92D8-4547-94F0-4945FCE74679@telia.com> <87pqdze3c0.fsf@netris.org> To: Mark H Weaver X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 1 Feb 2012, at 02:42, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Hans Aberg writes: >> With gcc-4.7.0 (from SVN), the test-ffi test now passes (libffi from >> GIT) >=20 > Excellent! I guess that this was a libffi bug. No, I think it is with llvm-gcc, in view of that it remained in that = compile (as described in another letter). >> but I get three other failures. >>=20 >> The compiler that is normally used on the system, is llvm-gcc-4.2, = and >> its compile is still running. >=20 > Please let us know the results of 'make check' when compiling with > llvm-gcc-4.2. I'm especially curious to hear whether the bytevector > tests fail with that compiler as well. There is no such test with the llvm-gcc compiler, strangely enough: it = just produces a few tests. It does not show the header that is shown for = gcc-4.7 (below), like this Hans =46rom gcc-4.7 compile 'make check': Totals for this test run: passes: 34886 failures: 3 unexpected passes: 0 expected failures: 30 unresolved test cases: 29 untested test cases: 1 unsupported test cases: 9 errors: 0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 01 06:51:13 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 11:51:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48266 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsYiW-0003EZ-B0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:51:12 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:56630 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsYiJ-0003Dx-2c for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:51:10 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BA27026; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:50:37 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=TL2GiXwnRv8EYlsL+hjrYBgz2bY=; b=u6gzPf yR/WwoRP8NyzNLbtUqwflXP+iiwbBZq+E6dzYx3ig9apsT383eH9HxTXvAkLBdNj 3tnvRYFaTlMJYyzTfhQfMM23GkVvIvKJMfmMIIOVkdGQrbO9bBwdmuAM8KOJs98N EFu0NNvZoEwFNo/MYs4QPZGEKhUWCDkUWQ2UE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=dQoM3H6aG5CJ5RgiVUGE4mlLNkInWby/ 3bd2jm/B4XtvV5EaYrWQQGPTYtIjCcZ0GL2V5UboP2imMtrkWH+KVvqn/fAuoS5L v+8xw8tDGI6ZNqQ7dQqAE8Q2OSBDveIM0uhZcFCz2yHOwdFWgRa3GLIIJdiGhBPg 6HX+x3YAiv4= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557EC7025; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:50:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [85.50.103.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 989FC7024; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:50:36 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo To: Hans Aberg Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:50:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:18:48 +0100") Message-ID: <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F48A8470-4CCA-11E1-9581-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: Mark H Weaver , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 10681@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Wed 01 Feb 2012 10:18, Hans Aberg writes: > It suggests that problem is with llvm-gcc (an clang), I think. With > gcc-4.7 there is no libffi failure. Is it correct to say that you experience this issue if libffi is compiled with llvm-gcc / clang, but do not experience this issue if libffi is compiled with gcc-4.7 ? Trying to summarize; it has been hard to follow :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 01 08:37:56 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 13:37:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48315 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaNm-0006PE-Sa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:37:56 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:51186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaNi-0006Oy-2X for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:37:52 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E008CEC6A; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:36:29 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:36:32 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> To: Andy Wingo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: Mark H Weaver , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= , 10681@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 1 Feb 2012, at 12:50, Andy Wingo wrote: >> It suggests that problem is with llvm-gcc (an clang), I think. With >> gcc-4.7 there is no libffi failure. >=20 > Is it correct to say that you experience this issue if libffi is > compiled with llvm-gcc / clang, =85 Yes, and also guile-2.0.5 (see below for more info). > ...but do not experience this issue if > libffi is compiled with gcc-4.7 ? I have not tried that one. There is not issue with libffi from latest = GIT compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with SVN = gcc-4.7. > Trying to summarize; it has been hard to follow :) Indeed, as there are three compilers :-): /usr/bin/clang /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 These are provided by Xcode 4.2.1. So if one does not set CC, one will = use llvm-gcc-4.2. This compiler, llvm-gcc-4.2, is also what I use for system installation, = as the SVN gcc-4.7 is experimental. Also gcc-4.7 was compiled using = llvm-gcc-4.2; it did not compile with gcc-4.6.2. So it seems safest to stick to llvm-gcc-4.2, as that is what package = developers mostly will check against. Hans From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 01 09:14:45 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 14:14:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48413 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaxR-0007II-2M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:14:45 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:52021) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaxO-0007I6-CV for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:14:43 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E008D2A1A; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:14:02 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87pqdze3c0.fsf@netris.org> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:14:05 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5ECC16F6-1210-4ABD-B379-CAC2376E646F@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <97851F48-92D8-4547-94F0-4945FCE74679@telia.com> <87pqdze3c0.fsf@netris.org> To: Mark H Weaver X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 1 Feb 2012, at 02:42, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> Running bytevectors.test >> FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: = bytevector-sint-ref [small] (eval) >> FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: = bytevector-sint-ref [small] (compile) >=20 > In the directory where you built using GCC-4.7.0 (SVN), can you please > apply the following 'patch for bytevectors.test' =85 This assumes that one builds from within the source directory.=20 > and then, from the > guile-2.0.5 directory, run: >=20 > ./check-guile bytevectors.test >=20 > and show us the output? It did not help (output below).=20 Hans $ ./check-guile bytevectors.test Testing /usr/local/src/guile/gcc-4.7/guile-2.0.5-build/meta/guile ... = bytevectors.test with GUILE_LOAD_PATH=3D/usr/local/src/guile/gcc-4.7/guile-2.0.5/test-suite= Running bytevectors.test bytevector-sint-ref [small] failure: -16 4294967280 FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: = bytevector-sint-ref [small] (eval) bytevector-sint-ref [small] failure: -16 4294967280 FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: = bytevector-sint-ref [small] (compile) Totals for this test run: passes: 132 failures: 2 unexpected passes: 0 expected failures: 0 unresolved test cases: 0 untested test cases: 0 unsupported test cases: 0 errors: 0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 01 09:54:30 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 14:54:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48568 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsbZt-0000d1-Cz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:54:30 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:49114 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsbZm-0000cn-7N for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:54:28 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D7A8460; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:54:00 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Rd0kN69OZz8e2fOHIocm0MB+oew=; b=O9iRVU 0WarBOcoc1F1kNb/ON9eCrXdGfmbzlCDnkDtqfZrxEpSJZv8CyWtf2suYD1tCvrm EA0HvPnWjh8I604kUPXmf83RdY49tE7nDaoMyeHr8Ce6l16OS0O8m+EDIDugHOhv SJb4BVJWfVgX2m2KGCM8Nv7d6Saaqqh4+Amgs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lJlm6CVTYPF8s0c5NsRIGZhDFJITmDy9 YUISnICdunwv5SPuaeW76X2bXmVsgXOJr/nPh6QgcvlYvjmF3L0s/H/SCcz5A7HY kKOFH/uvPtqkeiNVMp9NLbwfS8IsXfMhB5iFKX2F71bLw8YEIaKaHqwKwlGppIsH FH1SgsKSKdY= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3294845F; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:53:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [85.50.103.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F7DB845E; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:53:59 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo To: Hans Aberg Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:53:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Hans Aberg's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:36:32 +0100") Message-ID: <87wr86r4e4.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 92B35B54-4CE4-11E1-B14D-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: Mark H Weaver , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 10681@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Wed 01 Feb 2012 14:36, Hans Aberg writes: > There is no issue with libffi from latest GIT compiled with > llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with SVN gcc-4.7. But there is an issue with libffi from git compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2? Can you try compiling libffi from GIT with gcc-4.7, and guile-2.0.5 with llvm-gcc-4.2? Just to check :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 01 10:08:51 2012 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 15:08:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49317 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsbnm-00018m-T8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:08:51 -0500 Received: from smtp-out21.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.208]:56017) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsbnk-00018Z-Oy for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:08:49 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out21.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EC0B93A01DAACB7; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:08:07 +0100 Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87wr86r4e4.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:08:10 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5CDCE837-9E9D-45EA-AEBF-FE5FBD5D4C00@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> <87wr86r4e4.fsf@pobox.com> To: Andy Wingo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681 Cc: Mark H Weaver , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= , 10681@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 1 Feb 2012, at 15:53, Andy Wingo wrote: >> There is no issue with libffi from latest GIT compiled with >> llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with SVN gcc-4.7. >=20 > But there is an issue with libffi from git compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2, > and guile-2.0.5 compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2? Right, only that I think the issue is with guile-2.0.5 compiled with = llvm-gcc-4.2. > Can you try compiling libffi from GIT with gcc-4.7, and guile-2.0.5 = with > llvm-gcc-4.2? >=20 > Just to check :) Unfortunately, llvm-gcc-4.2 is very slow; compiling guile-2.0.5 takes a = very long time. So I think I will have to give up on this one. Hans From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 06 14:28:38 2012 Received: (at 10681-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jul 2012 18:28:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53160 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnDGf-0004ML-UM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:28:38 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:38881 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnDGd-0004MD-Lx for 10681-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:28:36 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F94FCADD; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:23:36 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=PLtpxwH03t96A6xfcEWvZGFq1AA=; b=NYy34R 7L5JWAOmeuVEzvcBXp957wrkVFK7vdGVCfgu3TG4n+Z7dKkVVNrfXtGigKUeWLns ywQkM63x1LJaSPSVHt2M58PGR78aOzxkXfJWgnA5bVD+nPL8mDvFHNW89IREv/yp PprLgqyIWsHHp60g0j4R9SlOY2x5HCkXlqIe4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=fzy1IanV7iBLh1xGO1SE3Nr2mlXdmN3E 6FAaDfI02lt/usUgN7Au89NT+JDbIRzS3aaZUN9knOZFlNNhT0aZCEH7ek8uzA0p Sb7XHCwzI0ibqSziJwbnYNdS9vV+bYBc7qrjdbGFp0KU1QUAd6K3b3FKCS2gOOKg ngSmpTPwtK4= Received: from b-pb-sasl-sd. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37349CADC; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:23:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from badger (unknown [89.131.176.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9327CCADB; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:23:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo To: Hans Aberg Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> <87wr86r4e4.fsf@pobox.com> <5CDCE837-9E9D-45EA-AEBF-FE5FBD5D4C00@telia.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:23:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5CDCE837-9E9D-45EA-AEBF-FE5FBD5D4C00@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:08:10 +0100") Message-ID: <87r4sowxy3.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B3284A42-C797-11E1-9FB4-FA6787E41631-02397024!b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681-done Cc: Mark H Weaver , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 10681-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Wed 01 Feb 2012 16:08, Hans Aberg writes: > On 1 Feb 2012, at 15:53, Andy Wingo wrote: > >>> There is no issue with libffi from latest GIT compiled with >>> llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with SVN gcc-4.7. >> >> But there is an issue with libffi from git compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2, >> and guile-2.0.5 compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2? > > Right, only that I think the issue is with guile-2.0.5 compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2. > >> Can you try compiling libffi from GIT with gcc-4.7, and guile-2.0.5 with >> llvm-gcc-4.2? >> >> Just to check :) > > Unfortunately, llvm-gcc-4.2 is very slow; compiling guile-2.0.5 takes a very long time. So I think I will have to give up on this one. Closing this one as done then. Whenever you give a newer Guile a try (like tomorrow's 2.0.6), we can look again. Thanks! Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 07 08:09:04 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2012 12:09:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54099 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTot-0001we-GU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:09:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50281) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnToq-0001wG-Qs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:09:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTjv-0003mf-He for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:03:57 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:39042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTjv-0003mZ-E2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:03:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTjt-0006Jy-F0 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:03:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTjr-0003m1-BN for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:03:52 -0400 Received: from smtp-out21.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.208]:43642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTjr-0003lp-1N for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:03:51 -0400 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out21.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4FD624AF008D0F0A; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:03:47 +0200 Subject: Re: GNU Guile 2.0.6 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87r4sowxy3.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:03:44 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <643C117F-DC54-44E5-A3EE-C5481C3600DD@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> <87wr86r4e4.fsf@pobox.com> <5CDCE837-9E9D-45EA-AEBF-FE5FBD5D4C00@telia.com> <87r4sowxy3.fsf@pobox.com> To: Andy Wingo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guile bug X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) On 6 Jul 2012, at 20:23, Andy Wingo wrote: > Closing this one as done then. Whenever you give a newer Guile a try > (like tomorrow's 2.0.6), we can look again. Two tests failed. Drop me a note if you want further investigation. Hans ---- $ make check GEN public-submodule-commit make check-recursive Making check in lib make check-recursive make[4]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. Making check in meta make[2]: Nothing to be done for `check'. Making check in libguile make check-am make[3]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. Making check in module make[2]: Nothing to be done for `check'. Making check in guile-readline make check-am make[3]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. Making check in examples make[2]: Nothing to be done for `check'. Making check in emacs make[2]: Nothing to be done for `check'. Making check in test-suite Making check in standalone make check-am make test-num2integral test-round test-list test-unwind test-conversion = test-loose-ends test-scm-c-read test-scm-take-locale-symbol = test-scm-take-u8vector test-scm-to-latin1-string test-scm-values = test-with-guile-module test-scm-with-guile test-scm-spawn-thread = test-pthread-create test-pthread-create-secondary test-system-cmds = test-bad-identifiers test-require-extension test-guile-snarf = test-import-order test-command-line-encoding test-command-line-encoding2 = test-asmobs test-ffi test-fast-slot-ref test-mb-regexp test-use-srfi = test-extensions CC test_num2integral-test-num2integral.o CCLD test-num2integral CC test_round-test-round.o CCLD test-round CC test_list-test-list.o CCLD test-list CC test_unwind-test-unwind.o CCLD test-unwind CC test_conversion-test-conversion.o CCLD test-conversion CC test_loose_ends-test-loose-ends.o CCLD test-loose-ends CC test_scm_c_read-test-scm-c-read.o CCLD test-scm-c-read CC test_scm_take_locale_symbol-test-scm-take-locale-symbol.o CCLD test-scm-take-locale-symbol CC test_scm_take_u8vector-test-scm-take-u8vector.o CCLD test-scm-take-u8vector CC test_scm_to_latin1_string-test-scm-to-latin1-string.o CCLD test-scm-to-latin1-string CC test_scm_values-test-scm-values.o CCLD test-scm-values CC test_with_guile_module-test-with-guile-module.o CCLD test-with-guile-module CC test_scm_with_guile-test-scm-with-guile.o CCLD test-scm-with-guile CC test_scm_spawn_thread-test-scm-spawn-thread.o CCLD test-scm-spawn-thread CC test_pthread_create-test-pthread-create.o CCLD test-pthread-create CC test_pthread_create_secondary-test-pthread-create-secondary.o CCLD test-pthread-create-secondary make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-system-cmds'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-bad-identifiers'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-require-extension'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-guile-snarf'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-import-order'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-command-line-encoding'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-command-line-encoding2'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-asmobs'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-ffi'. make[5]: `test-fast-slot-ref' is up to date. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-mb-regexp'. make[5]: `test-use-srfi' is up to date. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-extensions'. make check-TESTS PASS: test-system-cmds PASS: test-bad-identifiers PASS: test-require-extension PASS: test-guile-snarf PASS: test-import-order PASS: test-command-line-encoding PASS: test-command-line-encoding2 PASS: test-num2integral PASS: test-round PASS: test-asmobs bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 FAIL: test-ffi PASS: test-list PASS: test-unwind fail: scm_is_unsigned_integer ((- (expt 2 64) 1), 0, = 18446744073709551615) =3D=3D 1 FAIL: test-conversion PASS: test-loose-ends PASS: test-fast-slot-ref PASS: test-mb-regexp PASS: test-use-srfi PASS: test-scm-c-read PASS: test-scm-take-locale-symbol PASS: test-scm-take-u8vector PASS: test-scm-to-latin1-string PASS: test-scm-values PASS: test-extensions PASS: test-with-guile-module PASS: test-scm-with-guile PASS: test-scm-spawn-thread PASS: test-pthread-create PASS: test-pthread-create-secondary =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 2 of 29 tests failed Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D make[5]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1 make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[3]: *** [check] Error 2 make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [check] Error 2 ---- From unknown Fri Jun 20 05:37:03 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator