From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guile bug Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13280197726444 (code B ref -1); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:23:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 14:22:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46549 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbj-0001fs-Vl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbh-0001fg-UZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbH-0006qe-Gk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:29 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:60358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbH-0006qW-Bw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:32932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbB-0005o6-0h for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEb5-0006pP-4R for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:16 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:33530) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEav-0006nk-Mn; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:01 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E0087B284; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:59 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:57 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) On 30 Jan 2012, at 23:02, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.0.5. The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler = i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: PASS: test-asmobs bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 /bin/sh: line 1: 96687 Bus error: 10 srcdir=3D"." builddir=3D"."= CHARSETALIASDIR=3D"/usr/local/src/guile/guile-2.0.5/lib" = GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=3D0 "../../meta/uninstalled-env" ${dir}$tst ... =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1 of 28 tests failed Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Done. Hans From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Hans Aberg Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.13280208537984 (code B ref 10681); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:41:02 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 14:40:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEtA-00024i-Kt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:40:53 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:52802 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEt4-00024W-Bf for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:40:50 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECB87D75; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:40:29 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=fGHV9dth7nomzpRtHjWZyoBLb9o=; b=I42tzz U9Ar45tgMaUPUV+r62ovVhp7VatZAfH7qQ5V5HeOnXL/GFLxxdj6WjgxfC+GT+9a Z2L1WJJq6imn8tiZaxwBAK+CNz0dvsJQGcCTUI9+rzZ+8LzXTfW1awXraxPXDVd0 7I0mfXctWvot53ioC+JrTm41vW1Zrb+QgwPbQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Sq+2JKoYw1BnGP6z9WJ1VMJOny/LnP2T HbgtG2hAJBzaFtIrWEDd3c3RF/2KGy5LwfYh6qBPBNm3f+utUmJzuh1rfA22hB8a rR5ZEFY13XcTynNCZZkvVc3EfMrfDNdWNvqb/z7YkLMORsp4IE/obbxKqdpkgV+a lMlfFIe0dmU= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76907D74; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:40:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [85.50.103.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F7FC7D73; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:40:29 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:40:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:57 +0100") Message-ID: <87fwewue93.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 85700B7A-4C19-11E1-B813-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30122 -- http://wingolog.org/ From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andy Wingo Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132802233010818 (code B ref 10681); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:06:01 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 15:05:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47374 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFGz-0002oR-L4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:05:30 -0500 Received: from smtp-out21.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.208]:60849) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFGw-0002oD-J2 for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:05:28 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out21.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EC0B93A01D2F4B6; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:05:00 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87fwewue93.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:04:58 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87fwewue93.fsf@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) On 31 Jan 2012, at 15:40, Andy Wingo wrote: > https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30122 I used /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2, which is different from clang. There is also this one http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2011-11/msg00026.html It asks for this output: $ grep scm_t_int8 libguile/scmconfig.h typedef int8_t scm_t_int8; It is the same with gcc-4.7.0. Hans From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Hans Aberg Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guile bug Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.132802316312045 (code B ref -1); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:20:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 15:19:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47384 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFUR-00038D-22 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:19:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38121) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFUN-000380-Ix for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:19:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFTx-0002P5-W0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:18:58 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:58470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFTx-0002P1-Uc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:18:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58567) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFTw-000495-Kn for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:18:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFTl-0002Jh-Fq for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:18:52 -0500 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:38986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFTl-0002JU-9O for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:18:41 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,596,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="142227890" Received: from unknown (HELO pluto) ([193.50.110.167]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 31 Jan 2012 16:18:40 +0100 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 12 =?UTF-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 220 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:18:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:57 +0100") Message-ID: <87ty3bj3xs.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Hi Hans, Hans Aberg skribis: > The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler i686= -apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: What is this? Apple=E2=80=99s GCC? DragonEgg? FWIW, this problem doesn=E2=80=99t show up on , which uses Apple=E2=80=99s = GCC 4.2.1 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guile bug Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.132802922720954 (code B ref -1); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:01:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 17:00:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH48-0005Ro-VJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:00:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40121) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH45-0005Rc-Mw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:00:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH3j-0001Mt-1N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:59:56 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:33260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH3i-0001Mh-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:59:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH3Y-0002Yv-Gu for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:59:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH3J-0001Bi-JY for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:59:44 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:39744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsH39-00016R-Mh; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:59:19 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E0088A201; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:59:16 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87ty3bj3xs.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:59:15 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0A510EAC-5890-4742-82A2-66655FE5F14F@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87ty3bj3xs.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) On 31 Jan 2012, at 16:18, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: >> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler = i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: >=20 > What is this? Apple=92s GCC? DragonEgg? On OS X 10.7.2, Xcode 4.2 installs two system compilers /usr/bin/clang /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 It is the latter, because that is one gets hold of without 'export = CC=3D...'. > FWIW, this problem doesn=92t show up on > , which uses Apple=92s = GCC > 4.2.1 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0. I get another error with gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 (from SVN, installed in = /usr/local/bin/gcc): PASS: test-asmobs /bin/sh: line 1: 33654 Bus error: 10 srcdir=3D"." builddir=3D"."= CHARSETALIASDIR=3D"/usr/local/src/guile/gcc-4.7/guile-2.0.5/lib" = GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=3D0 "../../meta/uninstalled-env" ${dir}$tst FAIL: test-ffi PASS: test-list ... =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1 of 28 tests failed Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D So the f-sum error seems to have to do with llvm-gcc (and possibly = clang). In both cases, the failure is FAIL: test-ffi Hans From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Hans Aberg Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.1328033171815 (code B ref 10681); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:07:02 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 18:06:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47536 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsI5q-0000D3-MU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:06:11 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:36077 ident=hope4) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsI5o-0000Ct-4R for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:06:09 -0500 Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsI5S-0003nH-JL; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:05:46 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:04:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:57 +0100") Message-ID: <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hans Aberg writes: > The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler > i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: > > PASS: test-asmobs > bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to be of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently being interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm guessing that this is libffi's job. Hans: can you please verify that your libffi's 'make check' passes all tests on your platform? If it passes, and if this ends up being a different build of 'libffi' than you were previously using, it would be helpful if you could install the newly-built 'libffi', then do a fresh rebuild of Guile 2.0.5 and see if that fixes the problem. Thanks, Mark From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.13280382448468 (code B ref 10681); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:31:01 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 19:30:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47604 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJPf-0002CX-P9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:30:44 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:49256) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJPd-0002CF-UW for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:30:43 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E00895010; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:30:04 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:30:03 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 31 Jan 2012, at 19:04, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler >> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: >>=20 >> PASS: test-asmobs >> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >=20 > I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to be > of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently = being > interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its > promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm = guessing > that this is libffi's job. It is broken (libffi from GIT, the only that works on OX 10.7): $ make check Making check in include make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'. Making check in testsuite make check-DEJAGNU srcdir=3D`CDPATH=3D"${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd ../../libffi/testsuite && = pwd`; export srcdir; \ EXPECT=3D`if [ -f ../../expect/expect ] ; then echo = ../../expect/expect ; else echo expect ; fi`; export EXPECT; \ runtest=3D`if [ -f ../../libffi/../dejagnu/runtest ] ; then echo = ../../libffi/../dejagnu/runtest ; else echo runtest; fi`; \ if /bin/sh -c "$runtest --version" > /dev/null 2>&1; then \ exit_status=3D0; l=3D'libffi'; for tool in $l; do \ if $runtest --tool $tool --srcdir $srcdir ; \ then :; else exit_status=3D1; fi; \ done; \ else echo "WARNING: could not find \`runtest'" 1>&2; :;\ fi; \ exit $exit_status WARNING: could not find `runtest' Making check in man make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'. make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check-am' > Hans: can you please verify that your libffi's 'make check' passes all > tests on your platform? If it passes, and if this ends up being a > different build of 'libffi' than you were previously using, it would = be > helpful if you could install the newly-built 'libffi', then do a fresh > rebuild of Guile 2.0.5 and see if that fixes the problem. I have installed the newly built libffi, but rebuilding guile takes a = lot of time. Hans From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Hans Aberg Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.13280386148977 (code B ref 10681); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 19:36:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47610 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJVd-0002Kk-Gx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:36:54 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:52576 ident=hope6) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJVb-0002Kc-3M for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:36:52 -0500 Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJVF-00047a-5j; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:36:29 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:35:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:30:03 +0100") Message-ID: <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hans Aberg writes: > On 31 Jan 2012, at 19:04, Mark H Weaver wrote: > >>> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler >>> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: >>> >>> PASS: test-asmobs >>> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >> >> I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to be >> of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently being >> interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its >> promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm guessing >> that this is libffi's job. > > It is broken (libffi from GIT, the only that works on OX 10.7): You need to install DejaGnu in order to run libffi's test suite. Thanks, Mark From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.13280389449593 (code B ref 10681); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:43:02 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 19:42:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47614 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJax-0002Ug-Og for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:42:23 -0500 Received: from smtp-out21.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.208]:51861) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJau-0002UR-5w for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:42:21 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out21.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EC0B93A01D4D396; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:41:44 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:41:41 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <123B4371-B3AD-4732-8A10-0E2748450574@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 31 Jan 2012, at 20:35, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>>> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the = compiler >>>> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode = 4.2.1: >>>>=20 >>>> PASS: test-asmobs >>>> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >>>=20 >>> I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to = be >>> of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently = being >>> interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its >>> promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm = guessing >>> that this is libffi's job. >>=20 >> It is broken (libffi from GIT, the only that works on OX 10.7): >=20 > You need to install DejaGnu in order to run libffi's test suite. > OK. I am rebuilding Guile. Stay tuned. Hans From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132804013711336 (code B ref 10681); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:03:01 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 20:02:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47621 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJuD-0002wn-ER for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:02:17 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:40908) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsJuB-0002wc-Ec for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:02:16 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E00897415; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:01:39 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:01:37 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6770CBE1-3793-4714-A6BA-2BFE20A77113@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 31 Jan 2012, at 20:35, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>>> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the = compiler >>>> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode = 4.2.1: >>>>=20 >>>> PASS: test-asmobs >>>> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >>>=20 >>> I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to = be >>> of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently = being >>> interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its >>> promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm = guessing >>> that this is libffi's job. >>=20 >> It is broken (libffi from GIT, the only that works on OX 10.7): >=20 > You need to install DejaGnu in order to run libffi's test suite. > It seem they passed (not giving any details). Hans Test Run on Tue Jan 31 20:51:33 2012 Native configuration is x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0 =3D=3D=3D libffi tests =3D=3D=3D Schedule of variations: unix Running target unix Using /usr/local/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description = file for target. Using /usr/local/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file = for target. Using /usr/local/src/libffi/git/libffi/testsuite/config/default.exp as = tool-and-target-specific interface file. Running /usr/local/src/libffi/git/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/call.exp = ... Running = /usr/local/src/libffi/git/libffi/testsuite/libffi.special/special.exp = ... =3D=3D=3D libffi Summary =3D=3D=3D # of expected passes 1659 # of unsupported tests 15 Making check in man make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'. make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132804740628062 (code B ref 10681); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:04:01 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 22:03:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47718 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsLnR-0007IY-Nj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:03:26 -0500 Received: from smtp-out11.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.200]:53564) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsLnP-0007IL-I5 for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:03:24 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out11.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC3D3500BE7729; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:02:45 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:02:43 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <97851F48-92D8-4547-94F0-4945FCE74679@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 31 Jan 2012, at 20:35, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>>> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the = compiler >>>> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode = 4.2.1: >>>>=20 >>>> PASS: test-asmobs >>>> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >>>=20 >>> I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to = be >>> of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently = being >>> interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its >>> promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm = guessing >>> that this is libffi's job. >>=20 >> It is broken (libffi from GIT, the only that works on OX 10.7): >=20 > You need to install DejaGnu in order to run libffi's test suite. > With gcc-4.7.0 (from SVN), the test-ffi test now passes (libffi from = GIT), but I get three other failures. The compiler that is normally used on the system, is llvm-gcc-4.2, and = its compile is still running. Hans Running bytevectors.test FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: = bytevector-sint-ref [small] (eval) FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: = bytevector-sint-ref [small] (compile) ... Running gc.test FAIL: gc.test: gc: Unused modules are removed ... Totals for this test run: passes: 34886 failures: 3 unexpected passes: 0 expected failures: 30 unresolved test cases: 29 untested test cases: 1 unsupported test cases: 9 errors: 0 FAIL: check-guile =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1 of 1 test failed Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132806009917412 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:35:02 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 01:34:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47869 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsP6A-0004Wm-KB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:34:59 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:51003) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsP67-0004WV-UU for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:34:57 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E008A3760; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:34:17 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:34:18 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 31 Jan 2012, at 20:35, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>>> The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the = compiler >>>> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode = 4.2.1: >>>>=20 >>>> PASS: test-asmobs >>>> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >>>=20 >>> I may be stating the obvious here, but the -1, which is declared to = be >>> of type 'scm_t_int8' in the C function being called, is apparently = being >>> interpreted as 255. This suggests that whatever is handling its >>> promotion to a full int is failing to extend its sign bit. I'm = guessing >>> that this is libffi's job. >>=20 >> It is broken (libffi from GIT, the only that works on OX 10.7): >=20 > You need to install DejaGnu in order to run libffi's test suite. > After doing this, the same failure with the LLVM-GCC compiler: /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 This is the compiler that one will use on OS X 10.7 if one installs = Xcode 4.2.1, and is not setting the compiler explicitly (or overriding = by another install). Hans PASS: test-asmobs bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 FAIL: test-ffi ... =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1 of 28 tests failed Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Hans Aberg Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132806066418325 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:45:01 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 01:44:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPFI-0004lV-26 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:44:24 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:40759 ident=hope4) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPFE-0004lM-Eb for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:44:21 -0500 Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPEp-0005R2-NT; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:43:56 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <97851F48-92D8-4547-94F0-4945FCE74679@telia.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:42:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <97851F48-92D8-4547-94F0-4945FCE74679@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:02:43 +0100") Message-ID: <87pqdze3c0.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hans Aberg writes: > With gcc-4.7.0 (from SVN), the test-ffi test now passes (libffi from > GIT) Excellent! I guess that this was a libffi bug. > but I get three other failures. > > The compiler that is normally used on the system, is llvm-gcc-4.2, and > its compile is still running. Please let us know the results of 'make check' when compiling with llvm-gcc-4.2. I'm especially curious to hear whether the bytevector tests fail with that compiler as well. > Running bytevectors.test > FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: bytevector-sint-ref [small] (eval) > FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: bytevector-sint-ref [small] (compile) In the directory where you built using GCC-4.7.0 (SVN), can you please apply the following 'patch for bytevectors.test' and then, from the guile-2.0.5 directory, run: ./check-guile bytevectors.test and show us the output? This is a shot in the dark, but I've also attached a patch that _might_ fix the bytevector problem. After applying it, it should be sufficient to simply run "make" again, and it shouldn't take long. Let us know! Thanks, Mark --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=BYTE_SWAP_TEST_HELP.patch Content-Description: Patch for bytevectors.test (to help diagnose) diff --git a/test-suite/tests/bytevectors.test b/test-suite/tests/bytevectors.test index 3007434..b652935 100644 --- a/test-suite/tests/bytevectors.test +++ b/test-suite/tests/bytevectors.test @@ -114,10 +114,14 @@ #xfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffd))) (pass-if "bytevector-sint-ref [small]" - (let ((b (u8-list->bytevector '(#xff #xf0 #xff)))) - (equal? (bytevector-sint-ref b 0 (endianness big) 2) - (bytevector-sint-ref b 1 (endianness little) 2) - -16))) + (let* ((b (u8-list->bytevector '(#xff #xf0 #xff))) + (be-result (bytevector-sint-ref b 0 (endianness big) 2)) + (le-result (bytevector-sint-ref b 1 (endianness little) 2))) + (or (equal? be-result le-result -16) + (begin (format (current-error-port) + "bytevector-sint-ref [small] failure: ~S ~S~%" + be-result le-result) + #f)))) (pass-if "bytevector-sint-ref [large]" (let ((b (make-bytevector 50))) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=BYTE_SWAP_FIX.patch Content-Description: A shot in the dark (possible fix) diff --git a/libguile/bytevectors.c b/libguile/bytevectors.c index fff5355..8574a36 100644 --- a/libguile/bytevectors.c +++ b/libguile/bytevectors.c @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ \ memcpy (&c_result, &c_bv[c_index], (_len) / 8); \ if (!scm_is_eq (endianness, scm_i_native_endianness)) \ - c_result = INT_SWAP (_len) (c_result); \ + c_result = (INT_TYPE (_len, _sign)) INT_SWAP (_len) ((INT_TYPE (_len, unsigned)) c_result); \ \ result = SCM_I_MAKINUM (c_result); \ } \ @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ \ c_value_short = (INT_TYPE (_len, _sign)) c_value; \ if (!scm_is_eq (endianness, scm_i_native_endianness)) \ - c_value_short = INT_SWAP (_len) (c_value_short); \ + c_value_short = (INT_TYPE (_len, _sign)) INT_SWAP (_len) ((INT_TYPE (_len, unsigned)) c_value_short); \ \ memcpy (&c_bv[c_index], &c_value_short, (_len) / 8); \ } \ @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ bytevector_large_set (char *c_bv, size_t c_size, int signed_p, INT_TYPE (16, _sign) c_value16; \ memcpy (&c_value16, c_bv, 2); \ if (swap) \ - value = (INT_TYPE (16, _sign)) bswap_16 (c_value16); \ + value = (INT_TYPE (16, _sign)) bswap_16 ((scm_t_uint16) c_value16); \ else \ value = c_value16; \ } \ @@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ bytevector_unsigned_ref (const char *c_bv, size_t c_size, SCM endianness) swap = !scm_is_eq (endianness, scm_i_native_endianness); \ \ if (swap) \ - c_value16 = (INT_TYPE (16, _sign)) bswap_16 (c_value); \ + c_value16 = (INT_TYPE (16, _sign)) bswap_16 ((scm_t_uint16) c_value); \ else \ c_value16 = c_value; \ \ --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Hans Aberg Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132806103518848 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:51:02 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 01:50:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47877 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPLG-0004tx-St for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:35 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:37567 ident=hope1) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPLE-0004tp-Lz for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:33 -0500 Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPKr-0005Rz-HZ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:09 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:49:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:34:18 +0100") Message-ID: <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hans Aberg writes: > After doing this, the same failure with the LLVM-GCC compiler: > /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 > /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 > i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 > > This is the compiler that one will use on OS X 10.7 if one installs > Xcode 4.2.1, and is not setting the compiler explicitly (or overriding > by another install). > > Hans > > > PASS: test-asmobs > bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 > FAIL: test-ffi Are you sure this guile was linked against your newly-built 'libffi'? Your previously reported results (using GCC 4.7.0 from SVN) seemed to suggest a bug in an earlier version of 'libffi' that has since been fixed in their development tree. Mark From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132808796931479 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:20:02 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 09:19:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWLg-0008Bf-Af for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:19:29 -0500 Received: from smtp-out11.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.200]:58602) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWLc-0008BS-Th for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:19:26 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out11.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC3D3500C06BD4; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:18:46 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:18:48 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 1 Feb 2012, at 02:49, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> After doing this, the same failure with the LLVM-GCC compiler: >> /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 >> /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 >> i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 >>=20 >> This is the compiler that one will use on OS X 10.7 if one installs >> Xcode 4.2.1, and is not setting the compiler explicitly (or = overriding >> by another install). >>=20 >> Hans >>=20 >>=20 >> PASS: test-asmobs >> bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 >> FAIL: test-ffi >=20 > Are you sure this guile was linked against your newly-built 'libffi'? Yes, I compiled it with llvm-gcc, and installed it. All new compiles = were made out of the source directory. > Your previously reported results (using GCC 4.7.0 from SVN) seemed to > suggest a bug in an earlier version of 'libffi' that has since been > fixed in their development tree. It suggests that problem is with llvm-gcc (an clang), I think. With = gcc-4.7 there is no libffi failure. Hans From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.1328088969453 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 09:36:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48201 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWbp-00007G-7l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:36:09 -0500 Received: from smtp-out11.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.200]:47116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWbn-000074-30 for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:36:07 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out11.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC3D3500C093A1; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:35:28 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87pqdze3c0.fsf@netris.org> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:35:30 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <97851F48-92D8-4547-94F0-4945FCE74679@telia.com> <87pqdze3c0.fsf@netris.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 1 Feb 2012, at 02:42, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Hans Aberg writes: >> With gcc-4.7.0 (from SVN), the test-ffi test now passes (libffi from >> GIT) >=20 > Excellent! I guess that this was a libffi bug. No, I think it is with llvm-gcc, in view of that it remained in that = compile (as described in another letter). >> but I get three other failures. >>=20 >> The compiler that is normally used on the system, is llvm-gcc-4.2, = and >> its compile is still running. >=20 > Please let us know the results of 'make check' when compiling with > llvm-gcc-4.2. I'm especially curious to hear whether the bytevector > tests fail with that compiler as well. There is no such test with the llvm-gcc compiler, strangely enough: it = just produces a few tests. It does not show the header that is shown for = gcc-4.7 (below), like this Hans =46rom gcc-4.7 compile 'make check': Totals for this test run: passes: 34886 failures: 3 unexpected passes: 0 expected failures: 30 unresolved test cases: 29 untested test cases: 1 unsupported test cases: 9 errors: 0 From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Hans Aberg Cc: Mark H Weaver , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 10681@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132809707312438 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:52:02 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 11:51:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48266 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsYiW-0003EZ-B0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:51:12 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:56630 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsYiJ-0003Dx-2c for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:51:10 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BA27026; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:50:37 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=TL2GiXwnRv8EYlsL+hjrYBgz2bY=; b=u6gzPf yR/WwoRP8NyzNLbtUqwflXP+iiwbBZq+E6dzYx3ig9apsT383eH9HxTXvAkLBdNj 3tnvRYFaTlMJYyzTfhQfMM23GkVvIvKJMfmMIIOVkdGQrbO9bBwdmuAM8KOJs98N EFu0NNvZoEwFNo/MYs4QPZGEKhUWCDkUWQ2UE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=dQoM3H6aG5CJ5RgiVUGE4mlLNkInWby/ 3bd2jm/B4XtvV5EaYrWQQGPTYtIjCcZ0GL2V5UboP2imMtrkWH+KVvqn/fAuoS5L v+8xw8tDGI6ZNqQ7dQqAE8Q2OSBDveIM0uhZcFCz2yHOwdFWgRa3GLIIJdiGhBPg 6HX+x3YAiv4= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557EC7025; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:50:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [85.50.103.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 989FC7024; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:50:36 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:50:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:18:48 +0100") Message-ID: <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F48A8470-4CCA-11E1-9581-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Wed 01 Feb 2012 10:18, Hans Aberg writes: > It suggests that problem is with llvm-gcc (an clang), I think. With > gcc-4.7 there is no libffi failure. Is it correct to say that you experience this issue if libffi is compiled with llvm-gcc / clang, but do not experience this issue if libffi is compiled with gcc-4.7 ? Trying to summarize; it has been hard to follow :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andy Wingo Cc: Mark H Weaver , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 10681@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132810347724633 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:38:01 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 13:37:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48315 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaNm-0006PE-Sa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:37:56 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:51186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaNi-0006Oy-2X for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:37:52 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E008CEC6A; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:36:29 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:36:32 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 1 Feb 2012, at 12:50, Andy Wingo wrote: >> It suggests that problem is with llvm-gcc (an clang), I think. With >> gcc-4.7 there is no libffi failure. >=20 > Is it correct to say that you experience this issue if libffi is > compiled with llvm-gcc / clang, =85 Yes, and also guile-2.0.5 (see below for more info). > ...but do not experience this issue if > libffi is compiled with gcc-4.7 ? I have not tried that one. There is not issue with libffi from latest = GIT compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with SVN = gcc-4.7. > Trying to summarize; it has been hard to follow :) Indeed, as there are three compilers :-): /usr/bin/clang /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 These are provided by Xcode 4.2.1. So if one does not set CC, one will = use llvm-gcc-4.2. This compiler, llvm-gcc-4.2, is also what I use for system installation, = as the SVN gcc-4.7 is experimental. Also gcc-4.7 was compiled using = llvm-gcc-4.2; it did not compile with gcc-4.6.2. So it seems safest to stick to llvm-gcc-4.2, as that is what package = developers mostly will check against. Hans From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132810568528047 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:15:01 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 14:14:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48413 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaxR-0007II-2M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:14:45 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:52021) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaxO-0007I6-CV for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:14:43 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E008D2A1A; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:14:02 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87pqdze3c0.fsf@netris.org> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:14:05 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5ECC16F6-1210-4ABD-B379-CAC2376E646F@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <97851F48-92D8-4547-94F0-4945FCE74679@telia.com> <87pqdze3c0.fsf@netris.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 1 Feb 2012, at 02:42, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> Running bytevectors.test >> FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: = bytevector-sint-ref [small] (eval) >> FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: = bytevector-sint-ref [small] (compile) >=20 > In the directory where you built using GCC-4.7.0 (SVN), can you please > apply the following 'patch for bytevectors.test' =85 This assumes that one builds from within the source directory.=20 > and then, from the > guile-2.0.5 directory, run: >=20 > ./check-guile bytevectors.test >=20 > and show us the output? It did not help (output below).=20 Hans $ ./check-guile bytevectors.test Testing /usr/local/src/guile/gcc-4.7/guile-2.0.5-build/meta/guile ... = bytevectors.test with GUILE_LOAD_PATH=3D/usr/local/src/guile/gcc-4.7/guile-2.0.5/test-suite= Running bytevectors.test bytevector-sint-ref [small] failure: -16 4294967280 FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: = bytevector-sint-ref [small] (eval) bytevector-sint-ref [small] failure: -16 4294967280 FAIL: bytevectors.test: 2.3 Operations on Bytes and Octets: = bytevector-sint-ref [small] (compile) Totals for this test run: passes: 132 failures: 2 unexpected passes: 0 expected failures: 0 unresolved test cases: 0 untested test cases: 0 unsupported test cases: 0 errors: 0 From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Hans Aberg Cc: Mark H Weaver , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 10681@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.13281080702425 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:55:01 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 14:54:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48568 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsbZt-0000d1-Cz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:54:30 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:49114 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsbZm-0000cn-7N for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:54:28 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D7A8460; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:54:00 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Rd0kN69OZz8e2fOHIocm0MB+oew=; b=O9iRVU 0WarBOcoc1F1kNb/ON9eCrXdGfmbzlCDnkDtqfZrxEpSJZv8CyWtf2suYD1tCvrm EA0HvPnWjh8I604kUPXmf83RdY49tE7nDaoMyeHr8Ce6l16OS0O8m+EDIDugHOhv SJb4BVJWfVgX2m2KGCM8Nv7d6Saaqqh4+Amgs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lJlm6CVTYPF8s0c5NsRIGZhDFJITmDy9 YUISnICdunwv5SPuaeW76X2bXmVsgXOJr/nPh6QgcvlYvjmF3L0s/H/SCcz5A7HY kKOFH/uvPtqkeiNVMp9NLbwfS8IsXfMhB5iFKX2F71bLw8YEIaKaHqwKwlGppIsH FH1SgsKSKdY= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3294845F; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:53:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [85.50.103.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F7DB845E; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:53:59 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:53:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Hans Aberg's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:36:32 +0100") Message-ID: <87wr86r4e4.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 92B35B54-4CE4-11E1-B14D-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Wed 01 Feb 2012 14:36, Hans Aberg writes: > There is no issue with libffi from latest GIT compiled with > llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with SVN gcc-4.7. But there is an issue with libffi from git compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2? Can you try compiling libffi from GIT with gcc-4.7, and guile-2.0.5 with llvm-gcc-4.2? Just to check :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andy Wingo Cc: Mark H Weaver , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 10681@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.13281089314392 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:09:01 +0000 Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 15:08:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49317 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsbnm-00018m-T8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:08:51 -0500 Received: from smtp-out21.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.208]:56017) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsbnk-00018Z-Oy for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:08:49 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out21.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EC0B93A01DAACB7; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:08:07 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87wr86r4e4.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:08:10 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5CDCE837-9E9D-45EA-AEBF-FE5FBD5D4C00@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> <87wr86r4e4.fsf@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 1 Feb 2012, at 15:53, Andy Wingo wrote: >> There is no issue with libffi from latest GIT compiled with >> llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with SVN gcc-4.7. >=20 > But there is an issue with libffi from git compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2, > and guile-2.0.5 compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2? Right, only that I think the issue is with guile-2.0.5 compiled with = llvm-gcc-4.2. > Can you try compiling libffi from GIT with gcc-4.7, and guile-2.0.5 = with > llvm-gcc-4.2? >=20 > Just to check :) Unfortunately, llvm-gcc-4.2 is very slow; compiling guile-2.0.5 takes a = very long time. So I think I will have to give up on this one. Hans From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Hans Aberg Subject: bug#10681: closed (Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released) Message-ID: References: <87r4sowxy3.fsf@pobox.com> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 10681 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guile Reply-To: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 18:29:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1341599342-16801-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1341599342-16801-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released which was filed against the guile package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 10681@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 10681: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D10681 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1341599342-16801-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 10681-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jul 2012 18:28:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53160 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnDGf-0004ML-UM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:28:38 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:38881 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnDGd-0004MD-Lx for 10681-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:28:36 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F94FCADD; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:23:36 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=PLtpxwH03t96A6xfcEWvZGFq1AA=; b=NYy34R 7L5JWAOmeuVEzvcBXp957wrkVFK7vdGVCfgu3TG4n+Z7dKkVVNrfXtGigKUeWLns ywQkM63x1LJaSPSVHt2M58PGR78aOzxkXfJWgnA5bVD+nPL8mDvFHNW89IREv/yp PprLgqyIWsHHp60g0j4R9SlOY2x5HCkXlqIe4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=fzy1IanV7iBLh1xGO1SE3Nr2mlXdmN3E 6FAaDfI02lt/usUgN7Au89NT+JDbIRzS3aaZUN9knOZFlNNhT0aZCEH7ek8uzA0p Sb7XHCwzI0ibqSziJwbnYNdS9vV+bYBc7qrjdbGFp0KU1QUAd6K3b3FKCS2gOOKg ngSmpTPwtK4= Received: from b-pb-sasl-sd. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37349CADC; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:23:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from badger (unknown [89.131.176.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9327CCADB; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:23:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy Wingo To: Hans Aberg Subject: Re: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> <87wr86r4e4.fsf@pobox.com> <5CDCE837-9E9D-45EA-AEBF-FE5FBD5D4C00@telia.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:23:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5CDCE837-9E9D-45EA-AEBF-FE5FBD5D4C00@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:08:10 +0100") Message-ID: <87r4sowxy3.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B3284A42-C797-11E1-9FB4-FA6787E41631-02397024!b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10681-done Cc: Mark H Weaver , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 10681-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Wed 01 Feb 2012 16:08, Hans Aberg writes: > On 1 Feb 2012, at 15:53, Andy Wingo wrote: > >>> There is no issue with libffi from latest GIT compiled with >>> llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with SVN gcc-4.7. >> >> But there is an issue with libffi from git compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2, >> and guile-2.0.5 compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2? > > Right, only that I think the issue is with guile-2.0.5 compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2. > >> Can you try compiling libffi from GIT with gcc-4.7, and guile-2.0.5 with >> llvm-gcc-4.2? >> >> Just to check :) > > Unfortunately, llvm-gcc-4.2 is very slow; compiling guile-2.0.5 takes a very long time. So I think I will have to give up on this one. Closing this one as done then. Whenever you give a newer Guile a try (like tomorrow's 2.0.6), we can look again. Thanks! Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ ------------=_1341599342-16801-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 14:22:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46549 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbj-0001fs-Vl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbh-0001fg-UZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbH-0006qe-Gk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:29 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:60358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbH-0006qW-Bw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:32932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEbB-0005o6-0h for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEb5-0006pP-4R for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:16 -0500 Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:33530) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsEav-0006nk-Mn; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:22:01 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E0087B284; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:59 +0100 Subject: Re: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:57 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guile bug X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) On 30 Jan 2012, at 23:02, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.0.5. The 'make check' gives this error, on OS X 10.7.2 using the compiler = i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 supplied by Xcode 4.2.1: PASS: test-asmobs bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 /bin/sh: line 1: 96687 Bus error: 10 srcdir=3D"." builddir=3D"."= CHARSETALIASDIR=3D"/usr/local/src/guile/guile-2.0.5/lib" = GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=3D0 "../../meta/uninstalled-env" ${dir}$tst ... =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1 of 28 tests failed Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Done. Hans ------------=_1341599342-16801-1-- From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:25:24 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.6 released Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andy Wingo Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guile bug Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13416629447484 (code B ref -1); Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:10:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2012 12:09:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54099 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTot-0001we-GU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:09:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50281) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnToq-0001wG-Qs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:09:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTjv-0003mf-He for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:03:57 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:39042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTjv-0003mZ-E2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:03:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTjt-0006Jy-F0 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:03:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTjr-0003m1-BN for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:03:52 -0400 Received: from smtp-out21.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.208]:43642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTjr-0003lp-1N for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 08:03:51 -0400 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out21.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4FD624AF008D0F0A; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:03:47 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Hans Aberg In-Reply-To: <87r4sowxy3.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:03:44 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <643C117F-DC54-44E5-A3EE-C5481C3600DD@telia.com> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> <87wr86r4e4.fsf@pobox.com> <5CDCE837-9E9D-45EA-AEBF-FE5FBD5D4C00@telia.com> <87r4sowxy3.fsf@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) On 6 Jul 2012, at 20:23, Andy Wingo wrote: > Closing this one as done then. Whenever you give a newer Guile a try > (like tomorrow's 2.0.6), we can look again. Two tests failed. Drop me a note if you want further investigation. Hans ---- $ make check GEN public-submodule-commit make check-recursive Making check in lib make check-recursive make[4]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. Making check in meta make[2]: Nothing to be done for `check'. Making check in libguile make check-am make[3]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. Making check in module make[2]: Nothing to be done for `check'. Making check in guile-readline make check-am make[3]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. Making check in examples make[2]: Nothing to be done for `check'. Making check in emacs make[2]: Nothing to be done for `check'. Making check in test-suite Making check in standalone make check-am make test-num2integral test-round test-list test-unwind test-conversion = test-loose-ends test-scm-c-read test-scm-take-locale-symbol = test-scm-take-u8vector test-scm-to-latin1-string test-scm-values = test-with-guile-module test-scm-with-guile test-scm-spawn-thread = test-pthread-create test-pthread-create-secondary test-system-cmds = test-bad-identifiers test-require-extension test-guile-snarf = test-import-order test-command-line-encoding test-command-line-encoding2 = test-asmobs test-ffi test-fast-slot-ref test-mb-regexp test-use-srfi = test-extensions CC test_num2integral-test-num2integral.o CCLD test-num2integral CC test_round-test-round.o CCLD test-round CC test_list-test-list.o CCLD test-list CC test_unwind-test-unwind.o CCLD test-unwind CC test_conversion-test-conversion.o CCLD test-conversion CC test_loose_ends-test-loose-ends.o CCLD test-loose-ends CC test_scm_c_read-test-scm-c-read.o CCLD test-scm-c-read CC test_scm_take_locale_symbol-test-scm-take-locale-symbol.o CCLD test-scm-take-locale-symbol CC test_scm_take_u8vector-test-scm-take-u8vector.o CCLD test-scm-take-u8vector CC test_scm_to_latin1_string-test-scm-to-latin1-string.o CCLD test-scm-to-latin1-string CC test_scm_values-test-scm-values.o CCLD test-scm-values CC test_with_guile_module-test-with-guile-module.o CCLD test-with-guile-module CC test_scm_with_guile-test-scm-with-guile.o CCLD test-scm-with-guile CC test_scm_spawn_thread-test-scm-spawn-thread.o CCLD test-scm-spawn-thread CC test_pthread_create-test-pthread-create.o CCLD test-pthread-create CC test_pthread_create_secondary-test-pthread-create-secondary.o CCLD test-pthread-create-secondary make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-system-cmds'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-bad-identifiers'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-require-extension'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-guile-snarf'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-import-order'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-command-line-encoding'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-command-line-encoding2'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-asmobs'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-ffi'. make[5]: `test-fast-slot-ref' is up to date. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-mb-regexp'. make[5]: `test-use-srfi' is up to date. make[5]: Nothing to be done for = `../../../guile-2.0.6/test-suite/standalone/test-extensions'. make check-TESTS PASS: test-system-cmds PASS: test-bad-identifiers PASS: test-require-extension PASS: test-guile-snarf PASS: test-import-order PASS: test-command-line-encoding PASS: test-command-line-encoding2 PASS: test-num2integral PASS: test-round PASS: test-asmobs bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': = expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 FAIL: test-ffi PASS: test-list PASS: test-unwind fail: scm_is_unsigned_integer ((- (expt 2 64) 1), 0, = 18446744073709551615) =3D=3D 1 FAIL: test-conversion PASS: test-loose-ends PASS: test-fast-slot-ref PASS: test-mb-regexp PASS: test-use-srfi PASS: test-scm-c-read PASS: test-scm-take-locale-symbol PASS: test-scm-take-u8vector PASS: test-scm-to-latin1-string PASS: test-scm-values PASS: test-extensions PASS: test-with-guile-module PASS: test-scm-with-guile PASS: test-scm-spawn-thread PASS: test-pthread-create PASS: test-pthread-create-secondary =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 2 of 29 tests failed Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D make[5]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1 make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[3]: *** [check] Error 2 make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [check] Error 2 ----