GNU bug report logs - #10671
Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 10671 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 10671 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matthew Wezowicz <mwezz <at> udel.edu>
To: bug-automake <at> gnu.org
Subject: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:47:33 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Bug encountered in Automake 1.11 Test Suite run.
stdinc.test failed.
Autoconf version 2.68.
Log attached.

-- 
Matthew "Wezzy" Wezowicz
University of Delaware GCL Undergraduate Researcher

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[test-suite.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wezowicz <mwezz <at> udel.edu>
Cc: 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:48:53 +0100

tags 10671 + moreinfo
severity 10671 minor
thanks

Hi Matthew, thanks for the report.

On 01/31/2012 03:47 AM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> Bug encountered in Automake 1.11 Test Suite run.
>
Consider that 1.11 is already some years old, and, most importantly,
suffers from a know security vulnerability:

  <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autotools.announce/131>

I'd advise you to install the latest version 1.11.2 instead (or wait
a few more days and install the soon-to-appear 1.11.3 version).

> stdinc.test failed.
> Autoconf version 2.68.
> Log attached.
> 
I've tried to run the test case with both automake 1.11 and with the
development version of automake, but couldn't reproduce the bug.  Can
you reproduce it consistently?  Or does the failure appears racily?

Thanks,
  Stefano

Message #15 received at 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wezowicz <mwezz <at> udel.edu>
Cc: 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:13:26 +0100

[Re-adding the list in CC:]
[Please don't drop it in future replies.  Thanks.]

On 01/31/2012 07:46 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> I ran the test three more times.
> All runs failed.
> I have attached the logs.
> 
> Do you need any more information about the specific system set-up I'm using?
>
Yes, that would be useful.  Even more important, could you send us a
tarball with the contents of the 'stdinc.dir' directory left behind by
the failing test?

Thanks,
  Stefano

Message #18 received at 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matthew Wezowicz <mwezz <at> udel.edu>
To: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:15:59 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

The OS is CentOS 6.2 x86_64
Kernel Version: 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64
GCC Version: 4.4.6
Autconf Version: 2.68
Libtool Version: 2.4

The stdinc.dir and stdinc.log are attached as a .tar.

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Stefano Lattarini <
stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> [Re-adding the list in CC:]
> [Please don't drop it in future replies.  Thanks.]
>
> On 01/31/2012 07:46 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> > I ran the test three more times.
> > All runs failed.
> > I have attached the logs.
> >
> > Do you need any more information about the specific system set-up I'm
> using?
> >
> Yes, that would be useful.  Even more important, could you send us a
> tarball with the contents of the 'stdinc.dir' directory left behind by
> the failing test?
>
> Thanks,
>  Stefano
>



-- 
Matthew "Wezzy" Wezowicz
University of Delaware GCL Undergraduate Researcher

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[stdinc.dir.tar (application/x-tar, attachment)]

Message #21 received at 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wezowicz <mwezz <at> udel.edu>
Cc: 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:49:02 +0100

On 01/31/2012 09:15 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> The OS is CentOS 6.2 x86_64
> Kernel Version: 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64
> GCC Version: 4.4.6
> Autconf Version: 2.68
> Libtool Version: 2.4
> 
> The stdinc.dir and stdinc.log are attached as a .tar.
>
Thanks.  However, I still cannot reproduce the problem (even using
the contents of the tarball you've sent me).  But I've noticed that
all the files in that tarball have *all* the permission bits set:

  $ tar tvf ~/stdinc.dir.tar
  ...
  -rwxrwxrwx 0/0  32933 2012-01-31 19:41 stdinc.dir/config.status
  -rwxrwxrwx 0/0      9 2012-01-31 19:41 stdinc.dir/sub/bar.h
  ...

which is weird... Have you changed their permission before storing
them in the tarball?  Maybe the failure you are experiencing is the
result of some weird permission problem/misconfiguration...  What is
your umask?  Have you installed SELinux on your system?

Could you please post the result of the following commands?

  $ umask
  $ make check TESTS="stdinc.test"
  $ ls -ARZ --full-time stdinc.dir
  $ stat stdinc.dir/sub stdinc.dir/build/sub

Thanks,
  Stefano

Message #24 received at 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Peter Rosin <peda <at> lysator.liu.se>
To: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Matthew Wezowicz <mwezz <at> udel.edu>
Subject: Re: bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:22:47 +0100

Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-01 09:49:
> On 01/31/2012 09:15 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
>> The OS is CentOS 6.2 x86_64
>> Kernel Version: 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64
>> GCC Version: 4.4.6
>> Autconf Version: 2.68
>> Libtool Version: 2.4
>>
>> The stdinc.dir and stdinc.log are attached as a .tar.
>>
> Thanks.  However, I still cannot reproduce the problem (even using
> the contents of the tarball you've sent me).  But I've noticed that
> all the files in that tarball have *all* the permission bits set:
> 
>   $ tar tvf ~/stdinc.dir.tar
>   ...
>   -rwxrwxrwx 0/0  32933 2012-01-31 19:41 stdinc.dir/config.status
>   -rwxrwxrwx 0/0      9 2012-01-31 19:41 stdinc.dir/sub/bar.h
>   ...
> 
> which is weird... Have you changed their permission before storing
> them in the tarball?  Maybe the failure you are experiencing is the
> result of some weird permission problem/misconfiguration...  What is
> your umask?  Have you installed SELinux on your system?

I thought you read the libtool lists and also assumed Matthew would
get back with the info from the other list, so I didn't speak up.
Anyway, have a look at this libttol bug:
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10672

Cheers,
Peter

Message #27 received at 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: Peter Rosin <peda <at> lysator.liu.se>
Cc: 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Matthew Wezowicz <mwezz <at> udel.edu>
Subject: Re: bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:44:58 +0100

On 02/01/2012 10:22 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
> I thought you read the libtool lists and also assumed Matthew would
> get back with the info from the other list, so I didn't speak up.
> Anyway, have a look at this libttol bug:
> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10672
>
Thanks for the pointer.  In fact I'm subscribed to the list, but I hadn't
read the relevant messages until after having sent my previous message.

So, at this point, we can assume the failure is a spurious one.  Anyway,
I'll wait one more day or so to hear for confirmation from Matthew,
before I go ahead and close the bug.

Thanks,
  Stefano

Message #30 received at 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matthew Wezowicz <mwezz <at> udel.edu>
To: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Peter Rosin <peda <at> lysator.liu.se>
Subject: Re: bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:53:30 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

All bits may have been accidentally set when I scp'ed stdinc.dir to my
Windows machine for inspection.
I sent the .tar from it.

I believe the SELinux is installed by default on CentOS 6.2 and I didn't
change it.

Following the Libtool bug I retrieved the newer 1.11.2 version of Automake
and rebuilt it in a local directory as well but I still get the same failed
stdinc test.

$ umask shows 0022

$ ls -ARZ --full-time stdinc.dir shows the following:

stdinc.dir:
total 344
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  34837
2012-02-01 12:42:03.031106957 -0500 aclocal.m4
drwxr-xr-x. 2 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users   4096
2012-02-01 12:42:03.594418870 -0500 autom4te.cache
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users     25
2012-02-01 12:42:02.724127443 -0500 bar.h
drwxr-xr-x. 4 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users   4096
2012-02-01 12:42:06.009242085 -0500 build
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users   1473
2012-02-01 12:42:07.572117114 -0500 config.cache
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users   8500
2012-02-01 12:42:07.808300463 -0500 config.log
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  32890
2012-02-01 12:42:07.641190276 -0500 config.status
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users 138842
2012-02-01 12:42:03.342043955 -0500 configure
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users    154
2012-02-01 12:42:02.717117588 -0500 configure.in
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  20334
2012-02-01 12:42:02.714106860 -0500 depcomp
drwxr-xr-x. 2 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users   4096
2012-02-01 12:42:07.824429393 -0500 .deps
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users     67
2012-02-01 12:42:02.722122062 -0500 foo.c
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  13998
2012-02-01 12:42:02.709127441 -0500 install-sh
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  20375
2012-02-01 12:42:07.708429390 -0500 Makefile
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users     61
2012-02-01 12:42:02.719116657 -0500 Makefile.am
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  20400
2012-02-01 12:42:04.137356511 -0500 Makefile.in
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  11419
2012-02-01 12:42:02.711116985 -0500 missing
drwxr-xr-x. 2 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users   4096
2012-02-01 12:42:07.752419398 -0500 sub

stdinc.dir/autom4te.cache:
total 508
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users 139288
2012-02-01 12:42:03.007106526 -0500 output.0
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users 139288
2012-02-01 12:42:03.254168887 -0500 output.1
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users 139288
2012-02-01 12:42:03.594418870 -0500 output.2
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users   9809
2012-02-01 12:42:04.078295075 -0500 requests
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  32963
2012-02-01 12:42:03.007106526 -0500 traces.0
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  20273
2012-02-01 12:42:03.254168887 -0500 traces.1
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  20273
2012-02-01 12:42:03.594418870 -0500 traces.2

stdinc.dir/build:
total 88
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  1473
2012-02-01 12:42:05.732182268 -0500 config.cache
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  8513
2012-02-01 12:42:05.970054425 -0500 config.log
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users 32740
2012-02-01 12:42:05.802377131 -0500 config.status
drwxr-xr-x. 2 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  4096
2012-02-01 12:42:06.003252444 -0500 .deps
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  7417
2012-02-01 12:42:06.024367023 -0500 foo
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  3016
2012-02-01 12:42:06.000252778 -0500 foo.o
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users 20429
2012-02-01 12:42:05.869044045 -0500 Makefile
drwxr-xr-x. 2 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  4096
2012-02-01 12:42:05.914117566 -0500 sub

stdinc.dir/build/.deps:
total 4
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users 64 2012-02-01
12:42:05.994231534 -0500 foo.Po

stdinc.dir/build/sub:
total 12
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users   9 2012-02-01
12:42:05.889064867 -0500 bar.h
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users 758 2012-02-01
12:42:05.907117122 -0500 config.h
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  27 2012-02-01
12:42:05.914117566 -0500 stamp-h1

stdinc.dir/.deps:
total 8
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  8 2012-02-01
12:42:07.778429589 -0500 foo.Po
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users 63 2012-02-01
12:42:07.824429393 -0500 foo.Tpo

stdinc.dir/sub:
total 20
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users   9 2012-02-01
12:42:07.727429487 -0500 bar.h
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users   9 2012-02-01
12:42:02.725122197 -0500 bar.h.in
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users 758 2012-02-01
12:42:07.745439994 -0500 config.h
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 mwezz users 629
2012-02-01 12:42:03.619429534 -0500 config.h.in
-rw-r--r--. 1 unconfined_u:object_r:default_t:s0 mwezz users  27 2012-02-01
12:42:07.752419398 -0500 stamp-h1

$ stat stdinc.dir/sub stdinc.dir/build/sub shows the following:

  File: `stdinc.dir/sub'
  Size: 4096          Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   directory
Device: 801h/2049d    Inode: 2099427     Links: 2
Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x)  Uid: ( 6378/   mwezz)   Gid: (  100/   users)
Access: 2012-02-01 12:44:19.573112184 -0500
Modify: 2012-02-01 12:42:07.752419398 -0500
Change: 2012-02-01 12:42:07.752419398 -0500
  File: `stdinc.dir/build/sub'
  Size: 4096          Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   directory
Device: 801h/2049d    Inode: 2099452     Links: 2
Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x)  Uid: ( 6378/   mwezz)   Gid: (  100/   users)
Access: 2012-02-01 12:44:19.572382508 -0500
Modify: 2012-02-01 12:42:05.914117566 -0500
Change: 2012-02-01 12:42:05.914117566 -0500

The new stdinc.dir.tar and stdinc.log have been attached.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Stefano Lattarini <
stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> On 02/01/2012 10:22 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >
> > I thought you read the libtool lists and also assumed Matthew would
> > get back with the info from the other list, so I didn't speak up.
> > Anyway, have a look at this libttol bug:
> > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10672
> >
> Thanks for the pointer.  In fact I'm subscribed to the list, but I hadn't
> read the relevant messages until after having sent my previous message.
>
> So, at this point, we can assume the failure is a spurious one.  Anyway,
> I'll wait one more day or so to hear for confirmation from Matthew,
> before I go ahead and close the bug.
>
> Thanks,
>  Stefano
>



-- 
Matthew "Wezzy" Wezowicz
University of Delaware GCL Undergraduate Researcher

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[stdinc.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[stdinc.dir.tar (application/x-tar, attachment)]

Message #33 received at 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wezowicz <mwezz <at> udel.edu>
Cc: 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Peter Rosin <peda <at> lysator.liu.se>
Subject: Re: bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:36:25 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Matthew, sorry for the delay.

On 02/01/2012 06:53 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> All bits may have been accidentally set when I scp'ed stdinc.dir to my
> Windows machine for inspection.
> I sent the .tar from it.
> 
> I believe the SELinux is installed by default on CentOS 6.2 and I didn't
> change it.
>
Let's hope it's not a SELinux-related bug -- I know basically nothing
about SELinux.

> Following the Libtool bug I retrieved the newer 1.11.2 version of Automake
> and rebuilt it in a local directory as well but I still get the same failed
> stdinc test.
>
And I still have no idea about what's really going on :-(

Could you try running the attached script, and post its output and results?

Thanks,
  Stefano

[foo.sh (application/x-sh, attachment)]

Message #36 received at 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matthew Wezowicz <mwezz <at> udel.edu>
To: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Peter Rosin <peda <at> lysator.liu.se>
Subject: Re: bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:39:52 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

The script prints the following to the console:

+ mkdir am.dir
+ cd am.dir
+ cat
+ echo 'int bar () { return 0; }'
+ mkdir sub
+ echo 'choke me'
+ st=0
+ gcc -I. -I./sub -c -o foo.o foo.c
In file included from foo.c:1:
./sub/bar.h:1: error: expected `=', `,', `;', `asm' or `__attribute__'
before `me'
+ echo FAIL 1
FAIL 1
+ st=1
+ rm -f foo.o
++ pwd
+ gcc -I/build-tmp/am.dir -I./sub -c -o foo.o foo.c
In file included from foo.c:1:
./sub/bar.h:1: error: expected `=', `,', `;', `asm' or `__attribute__'
before `me'
+ echo FAIL 2
FAIL 2
+ st=1
+ exit 1

I tar'ed and attached the entire contents of am.dir.


On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Stefano Lattarini <
stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Matthew, sorry for the delay.
>
> On 02/01/2012 06:53 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> > All bits may have been accidentally set when I scp'ed stdinc.dir to my
> > Windows machine for inspection.
> > I sent the .tar from it.
> >
> > I believe the SELinux is installed by default on CentOS 6.2 and I didn't
> > change it.
> >
> Let's hope it's not a SELinux-related bug -- I know basically nothing
> about SELinux.
>
> > Following the Libtool bug I retrieved the newer 1.11.2 version of
> Automake
> > and rebuilt it in a local directory as well but I still get the same
> failed
> > stdinc test.
> >
> And I still have no idea about what's really going on :-(
>
> Could you try running the attached script, and post its output and results?
>
> Thanks,
>  Stefano
>



-- 
Matthew "Wezzy" Wezowicz
University of Delaware GCL Undergraduate Researcher

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[am.dir.tar (application/x-tar, attachment)]

Message #39 received at 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wezowicz <mwezz <at> udel.edu>
Cc: 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Peter Rosin <peda <at> lysator.liu.se>
Subject: Re: bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:28:13 +0100

tags 10671 - moreinfo
tags 10671 + notabug
close 10671
thanks

On 02/07/2012 09:39 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> The script prints the following to the console:
> 
> + mkdir am.dir
> + cd am.dir
> + cat
> + echo 'int bar () { return 0; }'
> + mkdir sub
> + echo 'choke me'
> + st=0
> + gcc -I. -I./sub -c -o foo.o foo.c
> In file included from foo.c:1:
> ./sub/bar.h:1: error: expected `=', `,', `;', `asm' or `__attribute__'
> before `me'
> + echo FAIL 1
> FAIL 1
> + st=1
> + rm -f foo.o
> ++ pwd
> + gcc -I/build-tmp/am.dir -I./sub -c -o foo.o foo.c
> In file included from foo.c:1:
> ./sub/bar.h:1: error: expected `=', `,', `;', `asm' or `__attribute__'
> before `me'
> + echo FAIL 2
> FAIL 2
> + st=1
> + exit 1
>
Ah ah!  So this is an issue with your compiler, not with Automake (good
for us, bad for you I guess ;-).  In fact, the script should work if you
compiler truly gave precedence to the files residing in directories
specified with earlier '-I' options (as it does on my system).

I'm thus closing this bug report as "not an Automake bug".  In case you
manage to find out what is wrong with your compiler's setup, feel free
to post it here, as more information might always be welcome by future
readers and bug reporters.

Thanks for your patience, and good luck,
  Stefano

Message #42 received at 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Matthew Wezowicz <mwezz <at> udel.edu>
To: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Peter Rosin <peda <at> lysator.liu.se>
Subject: Re: bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:00:36 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Thank you for your efforts.
Even if it didn't solve the problem I know at least know where to look now.

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Stefano Lattarini <
stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> tags 10671 - moreinfo
> tags 10671 + notabug
> close 10671
> thanks
>
> On 02/07/2012 09:39 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote:
> > The script prints the following to the console:
> >
> > + mkdir am.dir
> > + cd am.dir
> > + cat
> > + echo 'int bar () { return 0; }'
> > + mkdir sub
> > + echo 'choke me'
> > + st=0
> > + gcc -I. -I./sub -c -o foo.o foo.c
> > In file included from foo.c:1:
> > ./sub/bar.h:1: error: expected `=', `,', `;', `asm' or `__attribute__'
> > before `me'
> > + echo FAIL 1
> > FAIL 1
> > + st=1
> > + rm -f foo.o
> > ++ pwd
> > + gcc -I/build-tmp/am.dir -I./sub -c -o foo.o foo.c
> > In file included from foo.c:1:
> > ./sub/bar.h:1: error: expected `=', `,', `;', `asm' or `__attribute__'
> > before `me'
> > + echo FAIL 2
> > FAIL 2
> > + st=1
> > + exit 1
> >
> Ah ah!  So this is an issue with your compiler, not with Automake (good
> for us, bad for you I guess ;-).  In fact, the script should work if you
> compiler truly gave precedence to the files residing in directories
> specified with earlier '-I' options (as it does on my system).
>
> I'm thus closing this bug report as "not an Automake bug".  In case you
> manage to find out what is wrong with your compiler's setup, feel free
> to post it here, as more information might always be welcome by future
> readers and bug reporters.
>
> Thanks for your patience, and good luck,
>  Stefano
>



-- 
Matthew "Wezzy" Wezowicz
University of Delaware GCL Undergraduate Researcher

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #45 received at 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: 10671 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: truly close bug
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:45:40 +0100

close 10671
thanks

Oops, this report was still open despite the fact that we had recognized
it was not an automake bug.  I'm truly closing it now.

Sorry for the noise,
  Stefano

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.