From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 21:49:55 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2012 02:49:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46001 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqbsw-0007kO-CW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:49:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40707) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqbGV-0006s5-BK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:10:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqbFp-00010E-VE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:09:30 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RECEIVED_FROM_WINDOWS_HOST autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:48161) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqbFp-00010A-TW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:09:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqbFp-0000lg-5O for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:09:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqbFo-0000zt-BK for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:09:29 -0500 Received: from snt0-omc3-s8.snt0.hotmail.com ([65.55.90.147]:20855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqbFo-0000zc-8M for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:09:28 -0500 Received: from SNT112-W46 ([65.55.90.136]) by snt0-omc3-s8.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:09:26 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_71d96f10-051e-4c45-88f1-5021802826fb_" X-Originating-IP: [190.221.51.42] From: Lobo Oscuro To: Subject: BUG compilando install.c Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:09:26 -0300 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jan 2012 02:09:26.0882 (UTC) FILETIME=[B2252420:01CCDC98] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:49:53 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) --_71d96f10-051e-4c45-88f1-5021802826fb_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Se necesita el ejecutable ./install pero mirando los pasos en ningun mome= nto compila install.c y no se obtiene el ejecutable para ser instalado en /= usr/local/bin/install =2C se necesita los ejecutables ./install y ./install= -info para continuar con la instalacion del mismo paquete: /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./coreutils.info '/usr/local/share/info' install-info --info-dir=3D'/usr/local/share/info' '/usr/local/share/info/c= oreutils.info' Mirando la documentacion no dice nada relacionado con eso. Pero estoy seg= uro que asi como ese hay muchos archivos que no son compilados porque hay m= as codigos fuentes que ejecutables compilados. = --_71d96f10-051e-4c45-88f1-5021802826fb_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 =3B Se necesita el ejecutable ./install pero mirando los pasos en ning= un momento compila install.c y no se obtiene el ejecutable para ser instala= do en /usr/local/bin/install =2C se necesita los ejecutables ./install y ./= install-info para continuar con la instalacion del mismo paquete:

&n= bsp=3B/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./coreutils.info '/usr/local/share/info' =3Binstall-info --info-dir=3D'/usr/local/share/info' '/usr/local/sha= re/info/coreutils.info'

 =3B Mirando la documentacion no dice na= da relacionado con eso. Pero estoy seguro que asi como ese hay muchos archi= vos que no son compilados porque hay mas codigos fuentes que ejecutables co= mpilados.
= --_71d96f10-051e-4c45-88f1-5021802826fb_-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 08:43:18 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2012 13:43:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46370 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqm5G-00029Y-9a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:43:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52611) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqm58-00029E-EF; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:43:15 -0500 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0RDgVlP022733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:42:31 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.84] (ovpn-113-84.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.84]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0RDgUXl032731; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:42:31 -0500 Message-ID: <4F22A9C1.3040805@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:42:25 -0700 From: Eric Blake Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lobo Oscuro Subject: Re: bug#10619: BUG compilando install.c References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0B412FCAE3AF23B492503550" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.25 X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: 10619-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0B412FCAE3AF23B492503550 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable tag 10619 notabug thanks On 01/26/2012 07:09 PM, Lobo Oscuro wrote: Apologies that I am replying in English; while I can mostly read Spanish, I am not fluent enough to compose a reply in that language. >=20 > Se necesita el ejecutable ./install pero mirando los pasos en ningun = momento compila install.c y no se obtiene el ejecutable para ser instalad= o en /usr/local/bin/install , se necesita los ejecutables ./install y ./i= nstall-info para continuar con la instalacion del mismo paquete: >=20 > /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./coreutils.info '/usr/local/share/info' > install-info --info-dir=3D'/usr/local/share/info' '/usr/local/share/in= fo/coreutils.info' Those two command lines do _not_ imply that you need ./install nor =2E/install-info (that is, executables found in your current working directory), but rather the version of 'install' and 'install-info' as found via a $PATH search. You probably never want to run './install' or './install-info', but should instead run 'install' (for a PATH search) or '/usr/bin/install' (for an absolute path of the installed binary). >=20 > Mirando la documentacion no dice nada relacionado con eso. Pero estoy= seguro que asi como ese hay muchos archivos que no son compilados porque= hay mas codigos fuentes que ejecutables compilados. > =20 I'm assuming that you are using a GNU/Linux system, in which case it is safe to assume that these two programs (install is from coreutils, install-info is from info) are pre-installed and that your PATH is probably already set up to use them. There's generally no need to rebuild a local copy of either of these applications into your current working directory. I will go ahead and close out this bug report, but we can reopen it if you can provide more information relevant to the situation, or even a suggestion of where to make a documentation patch that would have helped you out in the first place. --=20 Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enig0B412FCAE3AF23B492503550 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPIqnGAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqaAoH/2Nk/5d4mNWGdCPZqKWMkKIk xS6I1id58UV6Bn9EqU6VAFedctz3Xc74CAbyPO+NYZdN+f0tevSKr83KnZTFcS+v GPVklLwYKKm17KhMq0txAf7MUoiwvXwlTFsNDl6SFH+UoYXZzSqBRYaO9Bs5s0Jx eLVHxH9BUBFWeEHaAWsu6wVdq8AyzMqWTgfe+ZkzbfR1rxsnk4ecviMNs1ycyM2C lKXqPsmgxxLPuBWb8PkA3vT9EDdSzZjhYK8VuY4J5MpS4Qt4Y3Kwu/6SB7Z2pX1V xLc9F2AS4vx5vln4mWD8MyPKkKDVXXnDJSN3iEY7kT8bthpqoTR4Dfeqe0ECsMc= =Xa/v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0B412FCAE3AF23B492503550-- From unknown Sat Jun 14 03:53:54 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:24:02 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator