GNU bug report logs - #10616
flush procedure for soft ports isn't called

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Ian Price <ianprice90 <at> googlemail.com>

Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:19:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ian Price <ianprice90 <at> googlemail.com>
To: 10616 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#10616: flush procedure for soft ports isn't called
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:27:47 +0000
Ian Price <ianprice90 <at> googlemail.com> writes:

> Yak, this example is a horrible one, since force-output doesn't return
> the return value of the procedure anyway, but if you try replacing it
> with (lambda () (throw 'wontthrow)), and you'll see it doesn't error
>
> In sf_flush in libguile/vports.c, there is a test
>   if (pt->write_pos > pt->write_buf)
> which some printf debugging tells me is never true, in fact, those
> values never change, no matter how much I write to the port. Some food
> for thought while I grapple with how the ports code is supposed to work.

OK, so as I understand it, this is supposed to check if there has been a
write to the port. And the buffer will have at most one character in it
because it is set up that way in scm_port_non_buffer.

I notice that sf_write doesn't update this buffer, but instead just
calls the write procedure directly. In that case, it makes sense that
the value isn't changing, and therefore maybe I should just change
sf_flush into a wrapper for the flush procedure?

-- 
Ian Price

"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"




This bug report was last modified 13 years and 132 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.