From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 23 15:59:01 2012 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2012 20:59:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41040 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RpQyi-0001Pc-Bi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:59:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58362) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RpQye-0001PN-PN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:58:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpQyI-0006PE-49 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:58:35 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:35040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpQyI-0006PA-2i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:58:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52713) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpQyG-0002Yq-W4 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:58:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpQyF-0006P0-OW for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:58:32 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:43128 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpQyF-0006Ow-IS for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:58:31 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A729F6A; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:58:30 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=hZRhylFMyxkH/mKSI6tilUFTcjc=; b=siL5/A EF6EqZloTgDK2VvD9/kVANVxfK0zCdiL7378cxPUVuWMYbHUinGCYjrH2CuGomQ1 f4sh4D6LWRrFaxUUTapZC44lPjwY0OXTpZYhii02FrDY1nWKOoTyqskx1a/ksKPn vnSrPNJP+Tm+6VJnlUcxdmp3+vJpOPzO6LNQU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=I732it+Ta6GiI/F640U+5N5eJJvkKS5k QbyAN5anbY8VtWnhdLRUQ9rC/OmPAF9Et1EMp9enfiRfttdE2Lc3mDz450gfgzgk +IVsA0sTg6rDPTQrRiBZI6dT4HDWicbsdW+205Fq/6v0yFfnqcNC8A/3uaFvnIEh rH6J2Z4qnqk= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D97F9F69; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:58:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC5699F68; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:58:29 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo To: erana Owl <0wl256@gmail.com> Subject: Re: failed build with --enable-debug-malloc References: Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:58:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: (erana Owl's message of "Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:57:53 +0900") Message-ID: <87aa5ennkd.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 00DE10A6-4605-11E1-B473-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) On Sun 22 Jan 2012 21:57, erana Owl <0wl256@gmail.com> writes: > running configure with --enable-debug-malloc fails on snarfing .doc Redirecting to bug-guile to create a new ticket. Thanks for the report, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 05 10:04:31 2012 Received: (at 10588-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2012 15:04:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru3dm-0004pZ-Jh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:04:31 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:42026 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru3dj-0004pQ-Bd for 10588-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:04:29 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA179386; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 10:03:41 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=JcHhhX+u8q8uDe7I89ja/6rVT2o=; b=aasslG AfEH6oGyB2QDyRIKmSn0r1F4bMwUemrJhZn40NLXjnBS+64KM98IPeBuF6igPT3x TY+rqId+8qa+/qxgNaSmKQUxg6wjFnd0nPPpgBixaycyCyMw/cxeOM7VWzIsJ3e9 +BlTXWVomLL7SwndLyB8NRzfaw8LIW5Xx0A9A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=odAeun+TTNc/1mcJ1hAQjIPLjY0UUTjX Jd2FcYVQAGrqsVWT4a79nLq/TaVGdNqBEqH6Da1p6bT7qsZKiVbkKKanOogKdftI 16ChbYBDf3i47pd6CCc4aA9I/iNA+6aRLAKy1URG5CFo0uNMTHKeakH/OcI9UwQB DIXLrYQzG6Q= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F239385; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 10:03:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [193.191.37.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D88F9384; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 10:03:41 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo To: erana Owl <0wl256@gmail.com> Subject: Re: bug#10588: failed build with --enable-debug-malloc References: <87aa5ennkd.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:03:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87aa5ennkd.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:58:26 +0100") Message-ID: <87ipjlgw51.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9744C49A-500A-11E1-8344-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10588-done Cc: 10588-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Mon 23 Jan 2012 21:58, Andy Wingo writes: > On Sun 22 Jan 2012 21:57, erana Owl <0wl256@gmail.com> writes: > >> running configure with --enable-debug-malloc fails on snarfing .doc I "fixed" this. Guile itself no longer registers GC-controlled mallocations, as since 2.0 it is no longer necessary (nor advised) to call scm_gc_free, so you don't get the pairing that you need to track numbers of live objects. We should probably remove the debug-malloc code entirely, given that it doesn't map well to the current API. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ From unknown Tue Jun 24 04:56:18 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator