From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:55:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10507: 24.0.92; Doc of `search-forward' (and backward) Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 10507 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 10507@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13265807015474 (code B ref -1); Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:39:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2012 22:38:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57711 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RmCEs-0001QC-Aw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:38:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46309) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RmCEo-0001Q4-Tu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:38:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RmCE4-0000O8-NX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:37:29 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:52608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RmCE4-0000O2-M5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:37:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RmCE3-0007fy-Mz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:37:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RmCE2-0000Ni-KH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:37:27 -0500 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:52769) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RmCE2-0000NY-FK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:37:26 -0500 Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id q0EMbOKU016622 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:37:25 GMT Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0EMbNm2020889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:37:24 GMT Received: from abhmt113.oracle.com (abhmt113.oracle.com [141.146.116.65]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q0EMbNVW008695 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:37:23 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.37.184) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:37:23 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:37:16 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Thread-Index: AczTDREaQk7PSRTwR1qIDp/NJXi+sg== X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4F1203A5.004B,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) Both the doc in the Elisp manual and the doc string seem to be incorrect, and this has apparently been the case for a very long time (at least as far back as Emacs 20). (search-forward "e" nil nil -1) searches BACKWARD for "e". But the doc says that it searches FORWARD. Furthermore, the doc says explicitly that the 4th arg MUST BE POSITIVE. That is no only NOT the case, it is even the case that the Emacs lisp code uses a negative value as the 4th arg. See, e.g., `zap-to-char'. In GNU Emacs 24.0.92.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2012-01-05 on MARVIN Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.6) --no-opt --cflags -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/src -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include -ID:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9/include --ldflags -LD:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9/lib' From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:55:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10507: 24.0.92; Doc of `search-forward' (and backward) Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10507 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Drew Adams" Cc: 10507@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10507-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10507.132672306329750 (code B ref 10507); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 10507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2012 14:11:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59875 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RmnH5-0007jm-3q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:11:03 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:24636) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RmnH3-0007jK-CO for 10507@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:11:01 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAIIuFE9FxKkV/2dsb2JhbABDqweBJYEKgQaBcgEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgNtVCJXQIBAQgCDBEDCQEBBgEFHgoEAQIBAQIDAQIBAQEBAoJ4AQYCAwcBBAEBAQESBQMNEAIDAgEBAwEBg0gEiDuaY4RS X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,518,1320642000"; d="scan'208";a="156987765" Received: from 69-196-169-21.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.169.21]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 16 Jan 2012 09:10:06 -0500 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 11E7D6610D; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:10:06 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier Message-ID: References: Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:10:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:37:16 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > Furthermore, the doc says explicitly that the 4th arg MUST BE POSITIVE. > That is no only NOT the case, it is even the case that the Emacs lisp > code uses a negative value as the 4th arg. See, e.g., `zap-to-char'. "MUST BE POSITIVE" doesn't mean that a negative argument will be rejected. So the doc is perfectly allowed to say "MUST BE POSITIVE" even if the code handles negative values (it just means that negative values are "NOT SUPPORTED"). And if some core code uses negative values, that's a naughty breach of abstraction, but that's about it. So I see no bug here. If you want a change, please say which and why. Stefan From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:55:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10507: 24.0.92; Doc of `search-forward' (and backward) Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10507 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "'Stefan Monnier'" Cc: 10507@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10507-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10507.1326725547986 (code B ref 10507); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:53:01 +0000 Received: (at 10507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2012 14:52:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rmnv8-0000Fr-GX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:52:27 -0500 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:63158) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rmnv6-0000Fj-2v for 10507@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:52:24 -0500 Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id q0GEpRjf007139 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:51:28 GMT Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0GEpRlu022569 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:51:27 GMT Received: from abhmt118.oracle.com (abhmt118.oracle.com [141.146.116.70]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q0GEpQbk024201; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:51:26 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.39.219) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:51:26 -0800 From: "Drew Adams" References: Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:51:16 -0800 Message-ID: <4F0FFFB47E574B9D9DF35AD518F331AC@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AczUWI8atjARiSjRSoC0e1BbLwst3wABDBPg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090202.4F143970.00D9,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) > > Furthermore, the doc says explicitly that the 4th arg MUST > > BE POSITIVE. That is no only NOT the case, it is even the > > case that the Emacs lisp code uses a negative value as the > > 4th arg. See, e.g., `zap-to-char'. > > "MUST BE POSITIVE" doesn't mean that a negative argument will > be rejected. So the doc is perfectly allowed to say "MUST BE > POSITIVE" even if the code handles negative values (it just > means that negative values are "NOT SUPPORTED"). And if some > core code uses negative values, that's a naughty breach of > abstraction, but that's about it. Words, even words like "must", can always be somewhat ambiguous. But "must" generally implies some sort of enforcement or negative consequences if not respected. "Should" is typically used when something is recommended but not prohibited or enforced. And if you say nothing at all about positive/non-positive then, as you are wont to say, "all bets are off" - no statement about support, the user knows nothing. I think that most readers would expect in this case ("must") that an error is raised if the arg is not positive - or at least that the function becomes a no-op. Compare the doc for `/': "The arguments must be numbers or markers." > So I see no bug here. If you want a change, please say which and why. A negative arg is supported by the code; it is used by Emacs source code; and it is useful. Knowing about it will mean simpler code by users. Please document (and support) it. Thx. From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:55:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10507: 24.0.92; Doc of `search-forward' (and backward) Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10507 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Drew Adams" Cc: 10507@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10507-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10507.13267273674142 (code B ref 10507); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:23:01 +0000 Received: (at 10507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2012 15:22:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60445 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RmoOU-00014k-3e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:22:46 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:41487) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RmoOQ-00014c-KN for 10507@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:22:44 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAD5AFE9FxKkV/2dsb2JhbABDqwiBJYEKgQaBcgEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgNtW2JXQIBAQgCDBEDCQEBBgEFHgoEAQIBAQUDAQEBAQKCeAEGAgMHAQQBAQEBEgUDDRACAwIBAQMBAYNIBIg7mmOEUg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,518,1320642000"; d="scan'208";a="156996481" Received: from 69-196-169-21.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.169.21]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 16 Jan 2012 10:21:30 -0500 Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 416396610D; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:21:30 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier Message-ID: References: <4F0FFFB47E574B9D9DF35AD518F331AC@us.oracle.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:21:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F0FFFB47E574B9D9DF35AD518F331AC@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:51:16 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) >> > Furthermore, the doc says explicitly that the 4th arg MUST >> > BE POSITIVE. That is no only NOT the case, it is even the >> > case that the Emacs lisp code uses a negative value as the >> > 4th arg. See, e.g., `zap-to-char'. >> >> "MUST BE POSITIVE" doesn't mean that a negative argument will >> be rejected. So the doc is perfectly allowed to say "MUST BE >> POSITIVE" even if the code handles negative values (it just >> means that negative values are "NOT SUPPORTED"). And if some >> core code uses negative values, that's a naughty breach of >> abstraction, but that's about it. > Words, even words like "must", can always be somewhat ambiguous. But "must" > generally implies some sort of enforcement or negative consequences if not > respected. "MUST" here means it's prohibited to send a negative value. That doesn't mean that if you do you'll get caught, nor how you'll get caught. >> So I see no bug here. If you want a change, please say which and why. > A negative arg is supported by the code; it is used by Emacs source > code; and it is useful. Knowing about it will mean simpler code by > users. Please document (and support) it. Thx. That is a much better bug-report, thank you. Stefan From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:55:09 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10507: 24.0.92; Doc of `search-forward' (and backward) Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10507 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Drew Adams" Cc: 10507@debbugs.gnu.org, 'Stefan Monnier' Received: via spool by 10507-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10507.132759296818568 (code B ref 10507); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 10507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2012 15:49:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45702 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqRZo-0004pP-2i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:49:28 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:42145 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqRZl-0004pG-PB for 10507@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:49:26 -0500 Received: from bb121-7-229-168.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.168]:35634 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqRZD-0007ts-Uw; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:48:52 -0500 From: Chong Yidong References: <4F0FFFB47E574B9D9DF35AD518F331AC@us.oracle.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:48:41 +0800 In-Reply-To: <4F0FFFB47E574B9D9DF35AD518F331AC@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:51:16 -0800") Message-ID: <87ty3io46e.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) "Drew Adams" writes: > A negative arg is supported by the code; it is used by Emacs source > code; and it is useful. Knowing about it will mean simpler code by > users. Please document (and support) it. Thx. Fixed, thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 10:49:34 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2012 15:49:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqRZt-0004pg-Iz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:49:34 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:42147 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqRZq-0004pZ-I1 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:49:31 -0500 Received: from bb121-7-229-168.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.168]:35635 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqRZJ-0007uH-DH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:48:58 -0500 From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close 10507 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:48:52 +0800 Message-ID: <87aa5a1n2z.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) close 10507 thanks