GNU bug report logs - #105
(split-string-and-unquote (combine-and-quote-strings STRINGS)) fails on trivial case

Previous Next

Full log

Message #10 received at 105 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
To: Joe Wells <jbw <at> macs.hw.ac.uk>
Cc: 105 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: (split-string-and-unquote (combine-and-quote-strings STRINGS)) fails on trivial case
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 01:31:34 -0400

> The documentation strings for both split-string-and-unquote and
> combine-and-quote-strings state that they attempt to achieve this
> property:
>
>   (split-string-and-unquote (combine-and-quote-strings strs)) == strs
>
> Here is a trivial case that they fail on; the following sexp wrongly
> evaluates to nil:
>
>   (let ((l '("a b" "c")))
>     (equal l
>            (split-string-and-unquote (combine-and-quote-strings l))))

I think this is a docstring mistake.  IIUC, the equation

 (split-string-and-unquote (combine-and-quote-strings strs)) == strs

only holds if STRS is a list containing a single string.  The point the
docstrings are trying to make is that combine-and-quote-strings performs
string quoting, while split-string-and-unquote performs unquoting.

If there are no objections to this interpretation, I'll check in a doc
fix shortly.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.