Subject: bug#10490: closed (Re: bug#10490: define-module documentation confusion)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:29:04 +0000

Your bug report

#10490: define-module documentation confusion

which was filed against the guile package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
10490: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10490
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#10490: define-module documentation confusion
From: Andy Wingo <[email-masked]>
To: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:11:25 +0100
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

On Thu 12 Jan 2012 21:09, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <[email-masked]> writes:

> According to the documentation, the module-name in define-module is of
> the form (hierarchy file).
>
> However, one can do  (define-module (foo)).

I think I fixed this for the 2.0.4 release.  Let me know if it's still
there.

Thanks!

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/

Subject: define-module documentation confusion
From: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:09:43 -0800
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

According to the documentation, the module-name in define-module is of
the form (hierarchy file).

However, one can do  (define-module (foo)).