GNU bug report logs - #10472
`realpath --relative-to=<path> /` outputs inconsistent trailing slash

Previous Next

Full log

Message #79 received at 10472 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
Cc: 10472 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10472: [PATCH] realpath: fix problems with // handling
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:53:35 -0600

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 03/14/2012 03:12 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 04:07 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 03/13/2012 09:15 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>> Also doesn't path_prefix() need the same adjustment,
>>>> so as to verify --relative-base in the same way?
>>>
>>> Yes, it looks like it.
>>
>> In fact, I found another bug, this time present also on Linux:
>>
>> $ realpath --relative-base=/ --relative-to=/ /
>> /
> 
> This may be a local issue?
> $ src/realpath --relative-base=/ --relative-to=/ /
> .

Looks like I was testing after some of my modifications to realpath.c;
I'm rebasing my tree to add the test before any of my realpath.c
changes, so that I can then be avoiding regressions.  But it still
doesn't explain:

$ src/realpath --relative-base=/ --relative-to=/ / /usr
.
/usr

where I would expect 'usr', not '/usr', since /usr is indeed a child of /.

>> $ realpath --relative-base=/usr/local --relative-to=/usr \
>>     /usr /usr/local/lib
>> /usr
>> /usr/local/lib
>>
>> when it should really output '/usr' (absolute, since it is not a child
>> of /usr/local) and 'local/lib' (which is a file below /usr/local, and an
>> output name relative to /usr).
> 
> Well that was by design. I.E. --relative-base is a guard,
> which if either --relative-to or the specified paths go higher,
> an absolute name will be output.

The documentation wasn't very clear on that point.  Either we need to
fix the documentation, or consider whether to make 'realpath' fail if
--relative-base is not a prefix of --relative-to, or even add another
option that allows the behavior I was expecting of making the two
orthogonal (that is, where it really is an independent filter - if the
path being canonicalized is a child of --relative-base, then output it
relative to --relative-to; otherwise output absolute).

Also, would it make sense to have --relative-base without --relative-to
imply a --relative-to of the same directory?  That is,

realpath --relative-base=/usr /usr

would be a useful shorthand for

realpath --relative-base=/usr --relative-to=/usr /usr

instead of its current error condition.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake <at> redhat.com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.