From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:54:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10455: Date: Possible bug in ISO-8601 formatted dates Resent-From: Dotan Cohen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 10455 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 10455@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.132604993222550 (code B ref -1); Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:13:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2012 19:12:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50307 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjyA7-0005re-A4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:12:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34624) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjwRx-0003M0-BH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:22:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjwRh-0001vG-UR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:22:14 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:57963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjwRh-0001v9-St for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:22:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59735) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjwRg-0001gQ-Kc for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:22:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjwRf-0001uk-Fj for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:22:12 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:37725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjwRf-0001ua-BS for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:22:11 -0500 Received: by wibhq12 with SMTP id hq12so3026766wib.0 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:22:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AH1YO8Nwu9I1LtISuVLV566lxqYnPlKW0N9b20zea6k=; b=lSjPZwpL+kiwO3eOzaBzv2zwj+3C/vLfLRbC6kNGoPuKLVCMQgxByWeOhrO1UWFRZB UYdJTixT/O9YZ4S3yNNU54ENDtHYRMnB9IqeQO9XESfGboiHRGvo9RofwSyPkrxjQADI atB1WzUtNuvv1y9/IKN3hY2nozqUa0duROUl4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.136.161 with SMTP id w33mr7495668wei.40.1326043329889; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:22:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.88.36 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 09:22:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:22:09 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dotan Cohen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:12:10 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) It seems that ISO-8601 formated dates are not properly handled by the date utility. The date utility seems to erroneously add timezone-shifting when using ISO-8601 dates. This example is fine (see the date roundtrip to back where it started): =E2=9C=88saturn:~$ date +%s -d "2006-12-31 22:00" 1167595200 =E2=9C=88saturn:~$ date -d @1167595200 Sun Dec 31 22:00:00 IST 2006 However, adding a "t" between the date and hour (as per ISO 8601) breaks the roundtrip (the timestamp is wrong): =E2=9C=88saturn:~$ date +%s -d "2006-12-31t22:00" 1167577200 =E2=9C=88saturn:~$ date -d @1167577200 Sun Dec 31 17:00:00 IST 2006 This is on a love-to-hate Debian-based distro, with GNU coreutils 8.5. I can confirm the issue on CentOS with date 5.97. Without the "t" the timestamp is correct: [root@gs beer]# date +%s -d "2006-12-31 22:00" 1167602400 [root@gs beer]# date -d @1167602400 Sun Dec 31 22:00:00 UTC 2006 And with it, the timestamp is wrong. [root@gs beer]# date +%s -d "2006-12-31t22:00" 1167577200 [root@gs beer]# date -d @1167577200 Sun Dec 31 15:00:00 UTC 2006 Note that IST (from the first server) is UTC+2. --=20 Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:54:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10455: Date: Possible bug in ISO-8601 formatted dates Resent-From: Bob Proulx Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 06:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10455 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Dotan Cohen Cc: 10455@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10455-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10455.132609178522592 (code B ref 10455); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 06:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 10455) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2012 06:49:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50582 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk93A-0005sK-AM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 01:49:44 -0500 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]:35006) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rk937-0005sA-2l for 10455@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 01:49:42 -0500 Received: from discord.proulx.com (discord.proulx.com [172.27.61.2]) (Authenticated sender: discord) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D58A7211D1; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 23:49:27 -0700 (MST) Received: by discord.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5AEF7D38675; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 23:49:27 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 23:49:27 -0700 From: Bob Proulx Message-ID: <20120109064927.GA22171@discord.proulx.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Dotan Cohen wrote: > It seems that ISO-8601 formated dates are not properly handled by the > date utility. GNU date didn't learn how to handle ISO-8601 until very recently. Your version 8.5 doesn't have that code yet. Here is the NEWS file entry for the change as it went into the recent 8.13 release. * Noteworthy changes in release 8.13 (2011-09-08) [stable] ** New features date now accepts ISO 8601 date-time strings with "T" as the separator. It has long parsed dates like "2004-02-29 16:21:42" with a space between the date and time strings. Now it also parses "2004-02-29T16:21:42" and fractional-second and time-zone-annotated variants like "2004-02-29T16:21:42.333-07:00" And here is the ChangeLog entry: date: support parsing of ISO-8601-with-"T" dates Thanks to an improvement in gnulib's parse-datetime module, commands like this now succeed (output manually indented): $ ./date -u -d 2004-02-29T16:21:42.33+07:00 +%FT%T.%N%z 2004-02-29T09:21:42.330000000+0000 * tests/misc/date: Add a test to exercise the new-in-gnulib parsing of ISO8601-with-"T" dates. * NEWS (New features): Mention it. * gnulib: Update, to pull in this parse-datetime improvement. Bob From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:54:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10455: Date: Possible bug in ISO-8601 formatted dates Resent-From: Dotan Cohen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10455 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Bob Proulx Cc: 10455@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10455-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10455.1326098811965 (code B ref 10455); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:47:01 +0000 Received: (at 10455) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2012 08:46:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50648 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkAsV-0000FW-2k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 03:46:51 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:39168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkAsS-0000FG-Oo for 10455@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 03:46:50 -0500 Received: by wgbdq12 with SMTP id dq12so1439005wgb.15 for <10455@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:46:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/LcGp+CBL9Y9/NDpyZIhJ1LA1E518cJX06CmnS/YZ4k=; b=Env8elKetrDkUsV1yvHDbanmQevmEWKnsBCi2JV3R1Nlg45MJcjKEVJn5ZBXBL1GFB peOv+YBiz3m9vPfNOFz+fG7txAiAuRG+Xnwk3CzbtJAJ02xtIAMqY51wBceQStJn/SHg w01ySOo7T+D9Id2IqqNG+Wes4zqe1QT20lJ3k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.107.195 with SMTP id he3mr3115655wib.13.1326098790209; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.88.36 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 00:46:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120109064927.GA22171@discord.proulx.com> References: <20120109064927.GA22171@discord.proulx.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:46:30 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dotan Cohen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 08:49, Bob Proulx wrote: > GNU date didn't learn how to handle ISO-8601 until very recently. > Your version 8.5 doesn't have that code yet. =C2=A0Here is the NEWS file > entry for the change as it went into the recent 8.13 release. > Thanks, Bob. Have a great week! --=20 Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:54:53 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Dotan Cohen Subject: bug#10455: closed (Re: bug#10455: Date: Possible bug in ISO-8601 formatted dates) Message-ID: References: <20120109171242.GA21508@hysteria.proulx.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 10455 X-Gnu-PR-Package: coreutils Reply-To: 10455@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:14:03 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1326129243-16732-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1326129243-16732-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #10455: Date: Possible bug in ISO-8601 formatted dates which was filed against the coreutils package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 10455@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 10455: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D10455 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1326129243-16732-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 10455-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2012 17:13:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51214 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkImK-0004Jm-QK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:13:01 -0500 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]:37070) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkImI-0004Jf-PP for 10455-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:12:59 -0500 Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E14F211D2; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:12:43 -0700 (MST) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EF1B02DCDE; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:12:42 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:12:42 -0700 From: Bob Proulx To: Dotan Cohen Subject: Re: bug#10455: Date: Possible bug in ISO-8601 formatted dates Message-ID: <20120109171242.GA21508@hysteria.proulx.com> References: <20120109064927.GA22171@discord.proulx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10455-done Cc: 10455-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Dotan Cohen wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > GNU date didn't learn how to handle ISO-8601 until very recently. > > Your version 8.5 doesn't have that code yet. Here is the NEWS file > > entry for the change as it went into the recent 8.13 release. > > Thanks, Bob. Have a great week! Good. I am going to close the bug report ticket with this message then. Bob ------------=_1326129243-16732-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2012 19:12:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50307 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjyA7-0005re-A4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:12:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34624) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjwRx-0003M0-BH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:22:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjwRh-0001vG-UR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:22:14 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:57963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjwRh-0001v9-St for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:22:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59735) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjwRg-0001gQ-Kc for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:22:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjwRf-0001uk-Fj for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:22:12 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:37725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjwRf-0001ua-BS for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:22:11 -0500 Received: by wibhq12 with SMTP id hq12so3026766wib.0 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:22:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AH1YO8Nwu9I1LtISuVLV566lxqYnPlKW0N9b20zea6k=; b=lSjPZwpL+kiwO3eOzaBzv2zwj+3C/vLfLRbC6kNGoPuKLVCMQgxByWeOhrO1UWFRZB UYdJTixT/O9YZ4S3yNNU54ENDtHYRMnB9IqeQO9XESfGboiHRGvo9RofwSyPkrxjQADI atB1WzUtNuvv1y9/IKN3hY2nozqUa0duROUl4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.136.161 with SMTP id w33mr7495668wei.40.1326043329889; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:22:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.88.36 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 09:22:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:22:09 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Date: Possible bug in ISO-8601 formatted dates From: Dotan Cohen To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:12:10 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) It seems that ISO-8601 formated dates are not properly handled by the date utility. The date utility seems to erroneously add timezone-shifting when using ISO-8601 dates. This example is fine (see the date roundtrip to back where it started): =E2=9C=88saturn:~$ date +%s -d "2006-12-31 22:00" 1167595200 =E2=9C=88saturn:~$ date -d @1167595200 Sun Dec 31 22:00:00 IST 2006 However, adding a "t" between the date and hour (as per ISO 8601) breaks the roundtrip (the timestamp is wrong): =E2=9C=88saturn:~$ date +%s -d "2006-12-31t22:00" 1167577200 =E2=9C=88saturn:~$ date -d @1167577200 Sun Dec 31 17:00:00 IST 2006 This is on a love-to-hate Debian-based distro, with GNU coreutils 8.5. I can confirm the issue on CentOS with date 5.97. Without the "t" the timestamp is correct: [root@gs beer]# date +%s -d "2006-12-31 22:00" 1167602400 [root@gs beer]# date -d @1167602400 Sun Dec 31 22:00:00 UTC 2006 And with it, the timestamp is wrong. [root@gs beer]# date +%s -d "2006-12-31t22:00" 1167577200 [root@gs beer]# date -d @1167577200 Sun Dec 31 15:00:00 UTC 2006 Note that IST (from the first server) is UTC+2. --=20 Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com ------------=_1326129243-16732-1-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:54:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10455: Date: Possible bug in ISO-8601 formatted dates Resent-From: Bob Proulx Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10455 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Dotan Cohen Cc: 10455@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10455-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10455.1326172400544 (code B ref 10455); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:14:02 +0000 Received: (at 10455) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2012 05:13:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51719 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkU1P-00008j-Lh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:13:19 -0500 Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]:39758) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkU1K-00008W-Ug for 10455@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:13:17 -0500 Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A5F211D2; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:12:49 -0700 (MST) Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 974482DCDE; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:12:49 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:12:49 -0700 From: Bob Proulx Message-ID: <20120110051249.GA6617@hysteria.proulx.com> References: <20120109064927.GA22171@discord.proulx.com> <20120109171242.GA21508@hysteria.proulx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hi Dotan, Dotan Cohen wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > Good. I am going to close the bug report ticket with this message > > then. > > No problem. I cannot test the later versions on any hardware I have > lying around, so when I see my distro up to 8.13 I'll double check. If > you would like me to confirm now do you have a system with a recent > GNU Tools that I could SSH into? For you I would actually give you a login on one of my systems. But instead how about if I send you a 'date' that is backported to Squeeze? Even though you say you love-to-hate it? :-) Then you can play with it and see the current behavior. Bob From unknown Sun Jun 22 07:54:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10455: Date: Possible bug in ISO-8601 formatted dates Resent-From: Dotan Cohen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10455 X-GNU-PR-Package: coreutils X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Bob Proulx Cc: 10455@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10455-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10455.132618040812113 (code B ref 10455); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:27:01 +0000 Received: (at 10455) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2012 07:26:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51766 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkW6Z-00039J-1Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:26:47 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]:58677) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkW6W-00039B-Dd for 10455@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:26:45 -0500 Received: by werb14 with SMTP id b14so3680636wer.3 for <10455@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:26:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lc7SrlKYiqMyHy68cIg6102zoxGMDYIyHZ2RCBW/edQ=; b=hmlmKd/vfo5bPgwbNf3l3xhxjVkwCPKQb9cirsivXwK7KKN/sK/Eda3ZMwa5Df5GsZ HEYXZ4/pDBbCK19rKutxnBEl4/4kvFbp9vfpXvwLft9kDxP6/QhsoPtXuAYbDys1UYzr tUzcpGVKF+5VzJrDOFGEtahcKGa+Nc47+9NnM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.131.152 with SMTP id m24mr10480177wei.56.1326180383519; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:26:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.88.36 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:26:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120110051249.GA6617@hysteria.proulx.com> References: <20120109064927.GA22171@discord.proulx.com> <20120109171242.GA21508@hysteria.proulx.com> <20120110051249.GA6617@hysteria.proulx.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:26:23 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dotan Cohen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:12, Bob Proulx wrote: > For you I would actually give you a login on one of my systems. =C2=A0But > instead how about if I send you a 'date' that is backported to > Squeeze? =C2=A0Even though you say you love-to-hate it? :-) =C2=A0Then yo= u can > play with it and see the current behavior. > Thanks, Bob. I checked with the backported date-8.13 and it performs as expected for the test case mentioned. That is, the issue is resolved. I love to love Debian! I was just embarrassed to mention that I use Kubuntu at home on a public mailing list. Here, I'm getting over it! Hence, a love-to-hate Debian-based distro! The backported date ran fine on Kubuntu. Thank you very much! --=20 Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com