From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:25:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10417: 24.0.92; Shell completion regression for shell-completion-execonly Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 15:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 10417 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 10417@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.132543073719684 (code B ref -1); Sun, 01 Jan 2012 15:13:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2012 15:12:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RhN57-00057Q-4P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 10:12:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RhN55-00057J-2R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 10:12:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhN22-0005B5-41 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 10:09:07 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:45916) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhN22-0005B0-2a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 10:09:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhN20-0005dA-H2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 10:09:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhN1z-0005Ai-Ee for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 10:09:04 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:49342) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhN1z-0005Ae-D7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 10:09:03 -0500 Received: from bb220-255-44-158.singnet.com.sg ([220.255.44.158]:41442 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RhN1y-0003TI-LV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2012 10:09:03 -0500 From: Chong Yidong Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 23:08:56 +0800 Message-ID: <87fwfzfojb.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) Suppose I have a non-executable file named screen.el in the current directory. With latest trunk: emacs -q M-: (setq shell-completion-execonly nil) RET M-x shell RET ./scr TAB Emacs says "No match" in the minibuffer. With Emacs 23, the TAB completes "./scr" to "./screen.el", which is the expected result for shell-completion-execonly nil. In GNU Emacs 24.0.92.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.2.0) of 2011-12-30 on furball Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11004000 configured using `configure '--with-x-toolkit=gtk3' 'CFLAGS=-g'' From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:25:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10417: 24.0.92; Shell completion regression for shell-completion-execonly Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 06:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10417 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 10417@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10417-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10417.132557252113497 (code B ref 10417); Tue, 03 Jan 2012 06:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 10417) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2012 06:35:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rhxxw-0003Vd-7W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:35:20 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rhxxs-0003VV-SO for 10417@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:35:18 -0500 Received: from [155.69.18.143] (port=54539 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rhxuh-0000La-1f for 10417@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:31:59 -0500 From: Chong Yidong References: <87fwfzfojb.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:31:52 +0800 In-Reply-To: <87fwfzfojb.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sun, 01 Jan 2012 23:08:56 +0800") Message-ID: <87k459wb3b.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) Chong Yidong writes: > Suppose I have a non-executable file named screen.el in the current > directory. With latest trunk: > > emacs -q > M-: (setq shell-completion-execonly nil) RET > M-x shell RET > ./scr > TAB > > Emacs says "No match" in the minibuffer. With Emacs 23, the TAB > completes "./scr" to "./screen.el", which is the expected result for > shell-completion-execonly nil. I fixed this by putting pcomplete-completions-at-point last in shell-dynamic-complete-functions (revno 106763). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 03 01:35:41 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2012 06:35:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RhxyG-0003WO-5o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:35:41 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RhxyD-0003W9-0Y for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:35:38 -0500 Received: from [155.69.18.143] (port=54541 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rhxv1-0000M5-DS for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:32:20 -0500 From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: close 10417 Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:32:13 +0800 Message-ID: <871urhnvo2.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) close 10417 thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 18 04:23:17 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2020 08:23:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58398 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi7o-0005ZW-TL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 04:23:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50994) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi7h-0005Z9-Vs; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 04:23:14 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi7b-0006KG-Jn; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 04:23:03 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2165 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi7Z-0006cR-Mh; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 04:23:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 11:22:50 +0300 Message-Id: <837dv1i65h.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Alex Branham In-Reply-To: <87zh7zrvf6.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Alex Branham on Thu, 16 Jul 2020 17:39:57 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#42383: 28.0.50; Two bugs with M-x compile References: <83h7u7lcaf.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh7zrvf6.fsf@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: ghe@sdf.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 42383-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) unarchive 10417 reopen 10417 unarchive 34330 reopen 34330 thanks > From: Alex Branham > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Gregory Heytings , > 42383@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 17:39:57 -0400 > > > yet, `pcomplete-completions-at-point` is supposed to perform filename > > completion also (via `pcomplete-default-completion-function`), so > > I think `pcomplete-completions-at-point` should come first and I suspect > > that the problem in bug#34330 is internal to pcomplete and the above > > commit just worked around it. > > I find pcomplete really confusing (why is it that there's a whole second > kind of completion framework outside completion-at-point?). But yes, > sounds like this should be reverted. I didn't notice this regression > since I use ivy which obviates the need to re-complete after typing a > letter. > > Someone will need to reopen bugs #10417 and #34330. OK, thanks. I've reverted the change and reopened those two bugs. From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:25:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10417: 24.0.92; Shell completion regression for shell-completion-execonly Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 15:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10417 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 10417@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10417-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10417.162973255212020 (code B ref 10417); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 15:30:02 +0000 Received: (at 10417) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2021 15:29:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42408 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIBsp-00037b-La for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:29:12 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45258) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIBsj-00036p-HE for 10417@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:29:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=U4SIR7iHVubYi+dxjkQVdQUNGyYD04bTShlu7e7zW9E=; b=SCh1Zzics1qdFXmK7MPbIRkTuK U6MNy0gWdGxO9lM+D2HXVys4O4yqv4TokPY+mJk8GCHWm7xwtZ+5RmS7R4aGKSOrFxEzqgFMous7G QkizdPzgyPxuKZwJy/lIVtRD80cCV7BTKnE9kdY6AiUPa9gofY4X+ra1LJIXHJGKrzFI=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIBsY-0004iK-SY; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:28:55 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87fwfzfojb.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:28:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87fwfzfojb.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sun, 01 Jan 2012 23:08:56 +0800") Message-ID: <87mtp8p4ct.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Chong Yidong writes: > Suppose I have a non-executable file named screen.el in the current > directory. With latest trunk: > > emacs -q > M-: (setq shell-completion-execonly nil) RET > M-x shell RET > ./scr > TAB > > Emac [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Chong Yidong writes: > Suppose I have a non-executable file named screen.el in the current > directory. With latest trunk: > > emacs -q > M-: (setq shell-completion-execonly nil) RET > M-x shell RET > ./scr > TAB > > Emacs says "No match" in the minibuffer. With Emacs 23, the TAB > completes "./scr" to "./screen.el", which is the expected result for > shell-completion-execonly nil. This was a decade ago, and I'm unable to reproduce this in Emacs 25.1 (or the current trunk). But this bug report was reopened (by Eli) as a response to bug#42383, so ... perhaps I'm testing this wrong? Or has this been re-fixed since it was reopened a year ago? (There has been changes in shell-command-completion-function the last year, but I'm not sure whether that explains it.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 23 11:29:15 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2021 15:29:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42410 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIBsu-00037p-3K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:29:15 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45272) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIBsn-00036x-Ga for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:29:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/WWfmUnuX5j61AjHaVjYRLz4/ASnFMCqwXMDIRoWHsE=; b=WCezqDQfHASNmKb96u7NpHfjXQ 9YqH1hdRf5YogpkRySDeg0fblxPyCiECZom3+Gw+S92mWkZqYajlNsnfwAHGOvS3dRCrwTbvjS05O UP/F41pS3gSzviSIcuzv9+87aiPtv7efJr7devevmS5cyYeoFSWibb/yQJV3SjosGqU0=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIBsf-0004iV-Nq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:28:59 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:28:57 +0200 Message-Id: <87lf4sp4cm.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #10417 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 10417 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 10417 + moreinfo quit From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:25:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10417: 24.0.92; Shell completion regression for shell-completion-execonly Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10417 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 10417@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10417-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10417.16297363922510 (code B ref 10417); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:34:02 +0000 Received: (at 10417) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2021 16:33:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42494 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mICsm-0000eM-2L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:33:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59136) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mICsg-0000dn-7a for 10417@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:33:06 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mICsa-0000u3-Tx; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:32:56 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2675 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mICsa-000445-Gq; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:32:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 19:32:47 +0300 Message-Id: <83mtp8w28g.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87mtp8p4ct.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:28:50 +0200) References: <87fwfzfojb.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtp8p4ct.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 10417@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:28:50 +0200 > > This was a decade ago, and I'm unable to reproduce this in Emacs 25.1 > (or the current trunk). The original report was in Emacs 24, not 25. I don't have a working Emacs 24 on Unix to try this. For the trunk, it could be that the completion-style preferences changed the default behavior. Note that the original report specifies an order of completion functions. From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:25:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10417: 24.0.92; Shell completion regression for shell-completion-execonly Resent-From: "Michalis V." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10417 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 10417@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10417-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10417.162988128220224 (code B ref 10417); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 10417) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2021 08:48:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45672 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIoZm-0005G8-GA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 04:48:02 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]:51796) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIoZk-0005Fc-Mv for 10417@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 04:48:01 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id u15so14439107wmj.1 for <10417@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 01:48:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=tmLbnhBZ21jdMqUEAXVlBg4qWvk+pT1p3HlHKunEriM=; b=JmpaJ7yeceZm4eOCrgHKWNIQboWzHCNbN34TjlmShi8hV6ReOC63/gp+NPUxrvSQMf /aY2/Q/hqsJyk/Z+SiI8eSKH/6EgjWaCfDTrOjDYwAIcSjCSqoFcnFazBxuEkqfR4ofg UK8UdanoVWYK8YZJT4IREy/abmMDs9YIWVe6EJpfrdznj4Yl/lNlRqtfJLvYYe7e5gaN HVc5Rd4t0jLxZsA+/pqa7+IMCF9fAET3Dkio92Yl+0vaLW7OhxT6DEXbSnkTLhANdQ8l Jy30kbAblmY4zlcYAT44ShkCbealrZRpN3c9VmNnQy5RKSqTH3woHKHKpIbbFjSco0B9 DS4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=tmLbnhBZ21jdMqUEAXVlBg4qWvk+pT1p3HlHKunEriM=; b=La4RSFgsrFEhUanBqpSAt2gzW5MOM3u8GpXNwsGbCzM3XzVNeNPQzacNYVyAgDgxvk HOYBjRHQ34jPDznGWL6prt1z52n0e1W2Mwjp8ClFcrGU+Q2gVi4T8U1e3/ydQoLe6K+T 80jt/k8GnzdIUmhkF0qn547Gq1xQc2zX6uP1bwyiFRFtlYmbFEpVrb+XrLr06HjqhM34 FN3S/Dl2BcfWJh8k8ojpgxWL70DzzZbFyXnrXxoT1REmez7KmO4lZRiaZmFhZhGfaMN4 v3cybUUX2UBJZ3fS2nUTwvH8z7NaALTe7LrRQ/ajZl29Bt6P1GPc0n+Z6RXajc02147V 3Vdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pz90zG85GjLeq0APu/CtOmh8wU4FJ9Sce5TPkkwrFIoAbQopx VmbN5/lBhbotUeaL03/0rpkzUA46SJVh1W4i X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxTmQTFsqQdcnSCx6u2hw4cW3jvWGyeU+goOCUL36pwZ31GPb8KnbCVAwxWt8gNj3lQPJOzow== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f8d:: with SMTP id n13mr8443095wmq.36.1629881274688; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 01:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cnu407c2zx.nsn-intra.net (109-178-141-246.pat.ren.cosmote.net. [109.178.141.246]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z11sm3967560wrw.53.2021.08.25.01.47.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 01:47:54 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michalis V." X-Google-Original-From: "Michalis V." References: <87fwfzfojb.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtp8p4ct.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtp8w28g.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 11:47:49 +0300 In-Reply-To: <83mtp8w28g.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 23 Aug 2021 19:32:47 +0300") Message-ID: <8735qxvrka.fsf@cnu407c2zx.nsn-intra.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >> Cc: 10417@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:28:50 +0200 >> >> This was a decade ago, and I'm unable to reproduce this in Emacs 25.1 >> (or the current trunk). > > The original report was in Emacs 24, not 25. I don't have a working > Emacs 24 on Unix to try this. For the trunk, it could be that the > completion-style preferences changed the default behavior. Note that > the original report specifies an order of completion functions. hi, FWIW i can reproduce this in linux with build 24.0.92.1 (head 651e947eb84b9201faa63ff6dc855a8c99ac8018). Not reproducible in 24.5, 27.1 or 28.0.50 Michalis From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:25:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10417: 24.0.92; Shell completion regression for shell-completion-execonly Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10417 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: "Michalis V." Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 10417@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10417-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10417.1629885904877 (code B ref 10417); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:06:01 +0000 Received: (at 10417) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2021 10:05:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45803 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIpmK-0000E5-5O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 06:05:04 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIpmJ-0000DX-73 for 10417@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 06:05:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PkjPqG9uHY16agoobE6iIMLGnOlrdXWVHgm3DimW8sk=; b=tIlFO2TbyEZLYhxuDV/PxOYKK0 1OR7MBs81iM+ncTAfHmYsi5YdHVCgLqT0OPRHx2kxzDC5IaZ56rPt8oYK039LybD3LmVIfOdjMyFu QBEhHnTmApOvPkqXsHuQ7sNzNCtmhT0FLNPE8fGA1yCGwJbm+CX5VWoa0gHTPEThQhBI=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIpm8-0002gl-VT; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:04:57 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87fwfzfojb.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtp8p4ct.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtp8w28g.fsf@gnu.org> <8735qxvrka.fsf@cnu407c2zx.nsn-intra.net> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:04:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8735qxvrka.fsf@cnu407c2zx.nsn-intra.net> (Michalis V.'s message of "Wed, 25 Aug 2021 11:47:49 +0300") Message-ID: <87v93tn8l7.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: "Michalis V." writes: > FWIW i can reproduce this in linux with build 24.0.92.1 (head > 651e947eb84b9201faa63ff6dc855a8c99ac8018). Not reproducible in 24.5, > 27.1 or 28.0.50 Thanks for checking. I'm closing this bug report, then. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) "Michalis V." writes: > FWIW i can reproduce this in linux with build 24.0.92.1 (head > 651e947eb84b9201faa63ff6dc855a8c99ac8018). Not reproducible in 24.5, > 27.1 or 28.0.50 Thanks for checking. I'm closing this bug report, then. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 25 06:05:16 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2021 10:05:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45806 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIpmW-0000Ec-CM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 06:05:16 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34568) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIpmU-0000EL-Bd for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 06:05:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BItDo3O2amRtAOKCwh/WPdu1oqwLff2gr8FShOHcxwY=; b=QOq0NZztrFPOdyRLjG6WIJB2+y /n0AOpVW0CpcsZ9NRE2w+cFBlA/rYlvqTNYlj0gIVPXkanis58YEZ6bojHJh6UcoZrvIvz32Y81eD 2bCnCFUjJde+BJS9XWJOP2RCEpruw5OGmi1Q5qHlDAPlHzUY49GmPnGOQ8HpFLnh0x4Q=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIpmM-0002h5-DG for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:05:08 +0200 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:05:05 +0200 Message-Id: <87tujdn8ku.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #10417 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 10417 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 10417 quit