From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 27 16:35:00 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2011 21:35:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rfefi-00069q-HW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:34:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rfefg-00069i-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:34:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rfed5-0006Ie-1L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:32:16 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:34170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rfed4-0006IW-W1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:32:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rfed3-0003ji-Sj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:32:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rfed2-0006II-LR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:32:13 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]:36363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rfecx-0006Hs-AW; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:32:07 -0500 Received: by qcsd17 with SMTP id d17so8120734qcs.0 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:32:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:subject:user-agent:mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to :reply-to:x-attribution:x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=otINGtlUEWQ4snc90m50tBdD09kN4Vtji9HUPHe9ab4=; b=Jf/ti36+2QEOmIgUqAXvtQrDYDoaMOjhrr0lV+PJDh84kSrmGrNXqb0tLejruQbql9 DLPbCm2b5SWabaaMHymdIH7MUt9tgCTPKd+lPgUd0xuW6U11M7HgdDK9OgOnqtXFFESF MLFD0D8eLIqZctTCxhpkj2owQ6xAPymYxF8s0= Received: by 10.229.135.20 with SMTP id l20mr10754264qct.77.1325021523786; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:32:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from t520sds ([204.19.0.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ft9sm53418397qab.20.2011.12.27.13.32.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:32:03 -0800 (PST) From: Sam Steingold To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.0.92; delete-other-windows-vertically depends on the window split order User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:32:01 -0500 Message-ID: <87pqf9d7la.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.5 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) In GNU Emacs 24.0.92.4 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars) of 2011-12-26 on t520sds Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11004000 configured using `configure '--with-wide-int'' `delete-other-windows-vertically' behavior depends on the order in which the windows were created. emacs -Q C-x 3 C-x 2 C-x o C-x o C-x 2 there are now 4 windows like this: ------- | | | ------- | | | ------- M-x delete-other-windows-vertically RET now there are 3 windows like this: ------- | | | ---| | | | | ------- which is correct. Now, create the 4 windows in a different order: emacs -Q C-x 2 C-x 3 C-x o C-x o C-x 3 there are now 4 windows like this: ------- | | | ------- | | | ------- M-x delete-other-windows-vertically RET now there are 3 windows like this: ------- | | ------- | | | ------- which is _WRONG_. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) X 11.0.11004000 http://thereligionofpeace.com http://jihadwatch.org http://truepeace.org http://honestreporting.com http://openvotingconsortium.org http://camera.org Those who can't write, write manuals. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 28 04:53:12 2011 Received: (at 10381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2011 09:53:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfqC8-0006g7-24 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:53:12 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfqC5-0006fy-6L for 10381@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:53:10 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2011 09:50:24 -0000 Received: from 62-47-52-13.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.52.13]) [62.47.52.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp062) with SMTP; 28 Dec 2011 10:50:24 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX193aFAUv4l3PHe0oNDBYXDidtFahAosfTpU+403b4 I4boN5MggHHwI5 Message-ID: <4EFAE65F.1020305@gmx.at> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:50:23 +0100 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sds@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#10381: 24.0.92; delete-other-windows-vertically depends on the window split order References: <87pqf9d7la.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87pqf9d7la.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10381 Cc: 10381@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) > `delete-other-windows-vertically' behavior depends on the order in which > the windows were created. Yes. > M-x delete-other-windows-vertically RET > > now there are 3 windows like this: > ------- > | | > ------- > | | | > ------- > > which is _WRONG_. Why? Your doc-string says Delete the windows in the same column with WINDOW, but not WINDOW itself. That sentence is vague but doesn't contradict what the function does. If you want the function do something different, I'd suggest reading section 28.2 Windows and Frames of the Elisp manual first and make yourself acquainted with internal windows. Then you will probably understand that the behavior you apparently strive for cannot be obtained when the first split of a frame's root window creates windows one above the other. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 28 12:53:25 2011 Received: (at 10381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2011 17:53:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rfxgr-00044S-54 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:53:25 -0500 Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rfxgo-00044L-A7 for 10381@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:53:23 -0500 Received: by qadb15 with SMTP id b15so7455815qad.3 for <10381@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:50:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=3h6Om7bu26DXpPTXVstmnAuFNb4BTckaqdfFJybs6SU=; b=LyxZQDDyaz3YhDWxm5hN0MtPQEvP0DR0vKJmW2hg/vK3H2qbTpVSkOFZULYA49WANU ZwNHIjpRrJguFEQzhZtsqr//JG3ml7ncb3sdOWIJEpsc2izrM0PCzjyX//Eh2xRPmJM3 bNadfyF8Be9zUs6cEVJZZF8aPGV316Q/PlY3Q= Received: by 10.224.95.197 with SMTP id e5mr38955491qan.0.1325094636557; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:50:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from t520sds ([204.19.0.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ft9sm59435871qab.20.2011.12.28.09.50.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:50:35 -0800 (PST) From: Sam Steingold To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#10381: 24.0.92; delete-other-windows-vertically depends on the window split order In-Reply-To: <4EFAE65F.1020305@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:50:23 +0100") References: <87pqf9d7la.fsf@gnu.org> <4EFAE65F.1020305@gmx.at> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:50:34 -0500 Message-ID: <8762h0bn6d.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10381 Cc: 10381@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) > * martin rudalics [2011-12-28 10:50:23 +0100]: > >> `delete-other-windows-vertically' behavior depends on the order in which >> the windows were created. > > Yes. > >> M-x delete-other-windows-vertically RET >> >> now there are 3 windows like this: >> ------- >> | | >> ------- >> | | | >> ------- >> >> which is _WRONG_. > > Why? Because in this case delete-other-windows-vertically deletes windows horizontally. I would have understood if the function did _nothing_, but deleting windows horizontally is clearly wrong. > Your doc-string says > > Delete the windows in the same column with WINDOW, but not WINDOW itself. > > That sentence is vague but doesn't contradict what the function does. this makes for a very unintuitive notion of a column. > If you want the function do something different, I'd suggest reading > section 28.2 Windows and Frames of the Elisp manual first and make > yourself acquainted with internal windows. Then you will probably > understand that the behavior you apparently strive for cannot be > obtained when the first split of a frame's root window creates windows > one above the other. this is very unfortunate. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) X 11.0.11004000 http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://memri.org http://dhimmi.com http://pmw.org.il http://jihadwatch.org http://palestinefacts.org A professor is someone who talks in someone else's sleep. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 28 13:05:10 2011 Received: (at 10381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2011 18:05:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfxsC-0004Kn-Ou for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:05:09 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.216.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rfxs9-0004Kg-TR for 10381@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:05:07 -0500 Received: by qcsf15 with SMTP id f15so7543648qcs.3 for <10381@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:02:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mail-copies-to:return-receipt-to:reply-to:x-attribution :x-disclaimer:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=ZX+XkYCBAl21G8yCbmDbw/+h8WR+btLzp4wnKfYUwno=; b=BND8Bgln47HTT8tYY1qZrimX5eJ+MvOQRM8vQa3Y9OHMqze0I8kbfMycn3i+UI8NmW aFqq6WqvxP0cM9li1uNoOScRLVZ8z1gzY/QMvoozcnQpvgT//ysqZ6s5HadylK6SBV5G ggkZkd/1FR7CckcXFqWghog94r9ln6po+LXVA= Received: by 10.229.105.195 with SMTP id u3mr11553811qco.118.1325095340161; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:02:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from t520sds ([204.19.0.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i7sm24143889qap.12.2011.12.28.10.02.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:02:19 -0800 (PST) From: Sam Steingold To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#10381: 24.0.92; delete-other-windows-vertically depends on the window split order In-Reply-To: <4EFAE65F.1020305@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:50:23 +0100") References: <87pqf9d7la.fsf@gnu.org> <4EFAE65F.1020305@gmx.at> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:02:17 -0500 Message-ID: <871urobmmu.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10381 Cc: 10381@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: sds@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) > * martin rudalics [2011-12-28 10:50:23 +0100]: > > If you want the function do something different, I'd suggest reading > section 28.2 Windows and Frames of the Elisp manual first and make C-h i runs the command info: in Elisp manual: 28 Maintaining Large Programs 28.2 Change Logs you probably meant 20.2 Splitting Windows which does not speak about columns of windows. > yourself acquainted with internal windows. C-s in info does not find "internal w" The bottom line is that there should be an easy way to merge two windows which is one under the other, no matter what the history of their creation was. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) X 11.0.11004000 http://memri.org http://mideasttruth.com http://honestreporting.com http://jihadwatch.org http://pmw.org.il http://thereligionofpeace.com Flying is not dangerous; crashing is. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 28 13:37:34 2011 Received: (at 10381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2011 18:37:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfyNa-00053e-9k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:37:34 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfyNX-00053V-KR for 10381@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:37:32 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2011 18:34:44 -0000 Received: from 62-47-52-13.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.52.13]) [62.47.52.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp072) with SMTP; 28 Dec 2011 19:34:44 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19hBDp089xhmH8AaTPYSiMPuoCMdQbezG8egPXY8J Q5UUJycL5ELZsr Message-ID: <4EFB6143.9000700@gmx.at> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:34:43 +0100 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sds@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#10381: 24.0.92; delete-other-windows-vertically depends on the window split order References: <87pqf9d7la.fsf@gnu.org> <4EFAE65F.1020305@gmx.at> <8762h0bn6d.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <8762h0bn6d.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10381 Cc: 10381@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) > Because in this case delete-other-windows-vertically deletes windows > horizontally. Really? > I would have understood if the function did _nothing_, but deleting > windows horizontally is clearly wrong. If you want the function to do nothing in that case, you would have to tell it do nothing. `window-combined-p' can help here. >> Delete the windows in the same column with WINDOW, but not WINDOW itself. >> >> That sentence is vague but doesn't contradict what the function does. > > this makes for a very unintuitive notion of a column. You probably should use the term "edge" instead of "column". Then you would see that the function indeed deletes every window whose corresponding edge has the same coordinate value as that of WINDOW. >> Then you will probably >> understand that the behavior you apparently strive for cannot be >> obtained when the first split of a frame's root window creates windows >> one above the other. > > this is very unfortunate. ... but deeply rooted in the way Emacs splits windows ever since. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 28 13:37:51 2011 Received: (at 10381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2011 18:37:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfyNq-000546-Iw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:37:50 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfyNo-00053x-AB for 10381@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:37:49 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2011 18:35:01 -0000 Received: from 62-47-52-13.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.52.13]) [62.47.52.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 28 Dec 2011 19:35:01 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+7OO1W+GS7IO1hRUm3pg9rWGn4pvkBqXhlQR3slf rDOMqQjUtTjMfO Message-ID: <4EFB6154.50206@gmx.at> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:35:00 +0100 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sds@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#10381: 24.0.92; delete-other-windows-vertically depends on the window split order References: <87pqf9d7la.fsf@gnu.org> <4EFAE65F.1020305@gmx.at> <871urobmmu.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <871urobmmu.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10381 Cc: 10381@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) > C-h i runs the command info: > in Elisp manual: > > 28 Maintaining Large Programs > 28.2 Change Logs If you read this your are in the Emacs manual. Elisp manual stands for the "The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual". martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 07 20:19:08 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2013 01:19:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42676 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3ccN-0007TS-Qd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:19:08 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54498) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3ccM-0007TL-0W for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:19:06 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3ccL-00079F-7b for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:19:05 -0500 Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:19:05 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 10381 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) tag 10381 notabug close 10381 From unknown Sat Aug 16 11:41:12 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator