From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 25 22:28:47 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2011 03:28:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rf1F1-0004hu-Co for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:28:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rf1Ex-0004hm-UL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:28:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rf1CW-0004Jk-IR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:26:13 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:54553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rf1CW-0004Jg-FZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:26:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rf1CU-0001co-W3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:26:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rf1CU-0004JT-2j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:26:10 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:51143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rf1CT-0004JO-PE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:26:09 -0500 Received: by iacb35 with SMTP id b35so19397578iac.0 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:26:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:x-debbugs-cc:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=4EcRcLIrbdDBwQYdmI4+J3DF8T65riP4unLQkClzuA0=; b=XO1ghD7s18DD+u+cfRQCtGHMI9QMa6irkJl0KCRv2Lm2N8BmASYj73yncvUwV4HRfQ oW4jj+NuJkfTBCPrPsbreVv92oshpqKhGtPqUEejib7hLLrs+bJMK6PXMiPkmgupA50R /0gbHmO4xUgYNUqOu0Kgm93N/vG4YVfKQpfi4= Received: by 10.50.186.169 with SMTP id fl9mr24358934igc.28.1324869969019; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:26:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([123.123.254.37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 36sm72519585ibc.6.2011.12.25.19.26.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:26:08 -0800 (PST) From: Leo To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 23.3.50; M-j in js-mode X-Debbugs-CC: Daniel Colascione Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 11:25:56 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) It seems M-j js-mode is better bound to a command that does something similar to C-mode or the global binding. Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 25 22:32:28 2011 Received: (at 10367) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2011 03:32:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rf1Ia-0004oG-0V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:32:28 -0500 Received: from dancol.org ([96.126.100.184]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rf1IX-0004o9-Vt for 10367@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:32:26 -0500 Received: from c-24-18-179-193.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([24.18.179.193] helo=edith.local) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rf1G6-0008Hq-SO; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:29:54 -0800 Message-ID: <4EF7EA2B.5090203@dancol.org> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:29:47 -0800 From: Daniel Colascione User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leo Subject: Re: bug#10367: 23.3.50; M-j in js-mode References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDD92B438A4B4536E9F539636" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10367 Cc: 10367@debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Colascione X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDD92B438A4B4536E9F539636 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/25/11 7:25 PM, Leo wrote: > It seems M-j js-mode is better bound to a command that does something > similar to C-mode or the global binding. >=20 > Leo >=20 >=20 >=20 Any objection to binding M-j to c-indent-new-comment-line in js-mode? (Yes, yes, I know we should fix indent-new-comment-line to do what c-indent-new-comment-line does, but I specifically designed js-mode to be= compatible with cc-mode editing functions, and this change will work for = now.) --------------enigDD92B438A4B4536E9F539636 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAk736jEACgkQ17c2LVA10Vt8RACg21moLwuzZ853djyuQ13zI8nt FqsAoI/awMd1tcIwk3m9ukw6PnaWOZ73 =c1sZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDD92B438A4B4536E9F539636-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 25 05:24:56 2020 Received: (at 10367) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2020 10:24:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34497 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khryq-0005oS-7B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 05:24:56 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com ([209.85.208.53]:42526) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khryo-0005oC-Or for 10367@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 05:24:55 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id v22so1953658edt.9 for <10367@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:24:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LOP6zSRN27y4QMLZ+xEChqVB4hsS8Trvc1ytVP/IBc4=; b=eMtlKFW0q+5IhR51qjG1aAGbk2kR+VSBCVKrszBPjSyy7vZcKXlLVm2FHY2vDqgCmm WLLuTW0MBs4PBmR6AB76o0ZKQIoCnvAt7piaC1x2G+SUnrEYY/zesPHmIzxdpqkJPY8k UtsyuTkqNP5S1QfelSbKxZ9stxwQxf2PzPSee76r5iTf/aykyoRkLN6ngWrf/Z+igT5X HxZkwtU6yecZZL804oGE7PMAB+xHuiVyXoY2Zooow9c0J75X9cXEcKHAnaf8k62FWPv1 K7eTdzFzIt1PBnyDQaMcJ/mD4ECQlGsA3NRHys3Z1nvq3IGPycQGxVigpunei0l8kr0a V/5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FWzhOSrA6kj3y9/LkPqUVFYNghz0ITZYYq/KLIz6p86eh/eIK LtMfE7KZUkhBaguVujQ1elZT8kv8NfcAqwiSjUg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3g++oJZ0HLSI8RNhn/fDjTnDveMznqvsTLzqv/XNRE3X3+tYEuenzJTECV/WXAW/qJAlpkr0ef8AUgQATMAo= X-Received: by 2002:a50:bb25:: with SMTP id y34mr2738081ede.249.1606299889094; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:24:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:24:48 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <4EF7EA2B.5090203@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:29:47 -0800") References: <4EF7EA2B.5090203@dancol.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:24:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#10367: 23.3.50; M-j in js-mode To: Daniel Colascione Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10367 Cc: 10367@debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Colascione , Leo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Daniel Colascione writes: > On 12/25/11 7:25 PM, Leo wrote: >> It seems M-j js-mode is better bound to a command that does something >> similar to C-mode or the global binding. > > Any objection to binding M-j to c-indent-new-comment-line in js-mode? > > (Yes, yes, I know we should fix indent-new-comment-line to do what > c-indent-new-comment-line does, but I specifically designed js-mode to be > compatible with cc-mode editing functions, and this change will work for now.) There has been no objections within 9 years. But I don't use js-mode, so I don't know what the best behavior here is. Does it make more sense for js-mode users? If so, it seems like you should perhaps just go ahead and make that change? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 16 08:39:44 2021 Received: (at 10367) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2021 12:39:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50834 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4N83-0003v1-VV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:39:44 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40762) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4N82-0003ud-IC for 10367@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:39:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=p1QaVL4wVaz026YUyMOOOjiaHwCy7rl7PTb0cXXRRPY=; b=XZfnCQDv9l51l7c3Xvml7+cdZm 0TJpkq/4mF3pNNxOdMNY95ukm6adXMXAhcRT6azD84GMAmUuC+ltS0SHQl4UN1sUFYMmJj/OsQ8Fy K1iqtjzIk9O1WVN2qK9yEUpsBklV8+8U3n7EvwDwknVaQYzOOgDCmvo308uNTjeD0DAM=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m4N7p-0004MG-RL; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:39:32 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#10367: 23.3.50; M-j in js-mode References: <4EF7EA2B.5090203@dancol.org> X-Now-Playing: Afik Naim's _Fabric 94: Steffi_: "Saturniidae" Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:39:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:24:48 -0800") Message-ID: <87r1fy8mbi.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: >> Any objection to binding M-j to c-indent-new-comment-line in js-mode? >> >> (Yes, yes, I know we should fix indent-new-comment-line to do what >> c-indent-new-comment-line does, but I specifically [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10367 Cc: 10367@debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Colascione , Daniel Colascione , Leo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Kangas writes: >> Any objection to binding M-j to c-indent-new-comment-line in js-mode? >> >> (Yes, yes, I know we should fix indent-new-comment-line to do what >> c-indent-new-comment-line does, but I specifically designed js-mode to be >> compatible with cc-mode editing functions, and this change will work for now.) > > There has been no objections within 9 years. But I don't use js-mode, > so I don't know what the best behavior here is. Does it make more sense > for js-mode users? If so, it seems like you should perhaps just go > ahead and make that change? It seems like this has changed in the years since this was reported. In both c-mode and js-mode, `M-j' is bound to `default-indent-new-line', and behaves the same in both modes, as far as I can tell. So I'm closing this bug report. If there's something I'm misunderstanding here, please respond to the debbugs address and we'll reopen. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 16 08:39:44 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2021 12:39:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50836 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4N84-0003v3-7X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:39:44 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40766) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4N82-0003uf-OV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:39:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Sxf4VxgvnKQx0iW5prk/UI1xQcJzp2aluJ5mBbIun1g=; b=Y1NONMDlVkZOstUQcSdwEW4qr5 It690ok6srw0T2rJOv13JJDH0G24Rk6cJa3lvPY7lxAUB2tIk9mGa5rKb+R+utGEcraDD70aSr9UJ H87kLE3whtdMUINLll37o9/9nMay53zoUFbWPwtyKo0N7MwUPuPpMMDyRW6u29UKQQTw=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m4N7v-0004ML-5O for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:39:37 +0200 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:39:34 +0200 Message-Id: <87pmvi8mbd.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #10367 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 10367 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 10367 quit From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:30:01 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator