GNU bug report logs - #10336
Holidays vs. release

Previous Next

Full log

Message #23 received at 10336 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: <dsmich <at> roadrunner.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 
	Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
Cc: 10336 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10336: Holidays vs. release
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:40:18 -0500

---- Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com> wrote: 
> Hi Ludovic,
> 
> I pushed a couple patches that should help this bug out, though for some
> reason I wasn't able to reproduce the issue before.  I wonder why.
> 
> On Wed 25 Jan 2012 17:10, ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> 
> > So I looked into it, and there’s at least one thing wrong: the test must
> > be compiled with #:partial-eval? #f, otherwise the ‘let’ vanishes, which
> > defeats the test.
> 
> Indeed.  I think I fixed that now.
> 
> > Second thing, it suffices to insert a function call like
> > ((lambda (x) #f) #f) just before calls to ‘gc’ to solve the problem.
> 
> Strange.  Another thing was that the function was a constant, not a
> closure, so it wasn't going to be collectable in the first place.
> 
> Can you retry the test now, Dale?

Sure.  v2.0.3-190-gf5e772b still has the same failure.

-Dale

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.