From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:12:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10336: Holidays vs. release Resent-From: Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 10336 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: guile-devel@gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org, dsmich@roadrunner.com, 10336@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , dsmich@roadrunner.com, bug-guile@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.132444576810669 (code B ref -1); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 05:37:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2011 05:36:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RdEqV-0002m0-2l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:36:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RdAYu-0004HT-CP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:01:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdAWw-0004FV-EA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:39 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:53491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdAWw-0004FR-Ci for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdAWv-0002zy-91 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdAWt-0004Ep-R4 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:37 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:10775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdAWt-0004Ek-LW for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:35 -0500 Authentication-Results: cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com smtp.user=dsmich@roadrunner.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=APbyNIPv c=1 sm=0 a=zTVDa7HKqxcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=doupyKFmAAAA:8 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=xGcgWY__ISYfmqExNpEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=0vUscowIxtUA:10 a=ii61gXl28gQA:10 a=KP/YX84if8whyb+LKdk8pQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Received: from [10.127.132.106] ([10.127.132.106:40500] helo=cdptpa-web15-z01) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTPA id BC/96-19251-67F21FE4; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:59:34 +0000 Message-ID: <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:34 -0500 From: In-Reply-To: <20111220210919.0YNV7.4169.root@cdptpa-web14-z02> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal X-Originating-IP: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:36:05 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) ---- dsmich@roadrunner.com wrote:=20 >=20 > ---- "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s" wrote:=20 > > Hello Guilers! > >=20 > > I initially thought it would be great to push a 2.0.4 tarball by the en= d > > of the year, but since I=E2=80=99ll be on holidays starting from tomorr= ow until > > Jan. 3rd, I won=E2=80=99t be able to make it. Sorry about that! >=20 > I'm still getting that one failure in make check. Something about gc a l= exicals? (Sorry I'm not at that machine.) Probably would be a good idea t= o tune that up before release anyway. >=20 > I'll post details when I can. I'm on a 32bit Debian intel system. libgc is 7.2alpha4 git describe is v2.0.3-82-ga2c6601 The single failure running make check is Running gc.test FAIL: gc.test: gc: Lexical vars are collectable -Dale From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:12:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10336: Holidays vs. release Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10336 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Cc: Andy Wingo , 10336@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10336-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10336.132572167326227 (code B ref 10336); Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 10336) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2012 00:01:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Riald-0006ox-1R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:01:13 -0500 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Riala-0006op-MU for 10336@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:01:12 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,459,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="125617038" Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO pluto) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 05 Jan 2012 00:57:42 +0100 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20111220210919.0YNV7.4169.root@cdptpa-web14-z02> <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 =?UTF-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 220 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:57:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> (dsmich@roadrunner.com's message of "Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:34 -0500") Message-ID: <87pqez9g22.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -9.3 (---------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -9.3 (---------) skribis: > I'm on a 32bit Debian intel system. libgc is 7.2alpha4 > > git describe is > v2.0.3-82-ga2c6601 > > The single failure running make check is > > Running gc.test > FAIL: gc.test: gc: Lexical vars are collectable Same problem on Hydra, but only i686, not x86_64. Andy: is it on purpose that this test doesn=E2=80=99t have a call to =E2=80=98stack-cleanup=E2=80=99 like those above? Should we add one? Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:12:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10336: Holidays vs. release Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10336 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Cc: Andy Wingo , 10336@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10336-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10336.132750788428476 (code B ref 10336); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 10336) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2012 16:11:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43526 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq5RT-0007PE-L0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:11:24 -0500 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]:47635) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq5RR-0007Ot-In for 10336@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:11:23 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,568,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="128831845" Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO pluto) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 25 Jan 2012 17:10:43 +0100 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20111220210919.0YNV7.4169.root@cdptpa-web14-z02> <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> <87pqez9g22.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:10:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pqez9g22.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Court\=E8s\?\= \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?\=22's\?\= message of "Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:57:41 +0100") Message-ID: <87mx9bkbjy.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) Hello! ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > skribis: > >> I'm on a 32bit Debian intel system. libgc is 7.2alpha4 >> >> git describe is >> v2.0.3-82-ga2c6601 >> >> The single failure running make check is >> >> Running gc.test >> FAIL: gc.test: gc: Lexical vars are collectable > > Same problem on Hydra, but only i686, not x86_64. So I looked into it, and there=E2=80=99s at least one thing wrong: the test= must be compiled with #:partial-eval? #f, otherwise the =E2=80=98let=E2=80=99 va= nishes, which defeats the test. Second thing, it suffices to insert a function call like ((lambda (x) #f) #f) just before calls to =E2=80=98gc=E2=80=99 to solve the= problem. So I=E2=80=99m thinking we may have a real bug here. I=E2=80=99ve changed the test this way: (pass-if "Lexical vars are collectable" (pair? (compile '(begin (define guardian (make-guardian)) (let ((f (list 1 2 3))) (guardian f)) ;; Note: no `stack-cleanup' call should be needed here since ;; leaving `let' should have the same effect. ;((lambda (x) x) #f) (gc)(gc)(gc) (guardian)) ;; Turn the partial evaluator off so that `let' is preserved. #:opts '(#:partial-eval? #f) #:env (current-module)))) The assembly code does seem to push =E2=80=98void=E2=80=99 in all cases, th= ough, but this needs to be double-checked. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:12:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10336: Holidays vs. release Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10336 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Cc: dsmich@roadrunner.com, 10336@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10336-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10336.13275148606597 (code B ref 10336); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 10336) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2012 18:07:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43700 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq7G0-0001iM-Ej for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:07:40 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:56094 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq7Fw-0001iB-R0 for 10336@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:07:38 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4D97CA6; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:07:09 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=kjCWccb0Cmu+ NI9CG9V7vciTNc0=; b=Zw+wPy3luL9QgPF6yCVq4U/cK7/NVx5q10DEYS3A4+7J 5WVvvxQIkBv/G6s5QOoe1s1pvFw3G/e9zbn4Su8A2mOqLoUsbjzHp0rZrbjyIZj7 uyhUBZq8/R9eno3/D76QnYMOpg+0NyUNI6y7cm+ulfYCyYbpby0gsOuKdbeakx4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=OFBp8w HxICnE4oRp98GkVi+42o9Bxw8BkLT86A4fm9jxfDNgGdkjIT/+00Uvcu6Tdq5WUj +ue+ccOEiyLF3S9VyyZ7KKqkinbw9zhMH75wWFr3hgx/BMB6TnmNSrkkpZwUI84R OOS2+ZqXxT8XJQg81SJN6QVE7ZFHTIPP7aFWM= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153D07CA5; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:07:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 414E47CA4; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:07:08 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo References: <20111220210919.0YNV7.4169.root@cdptpa-web14-z02> <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> <87pqez9g22.fsf@gnu.org> <87mx9bkbjy.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:07:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mx9bkbjy.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:10:41 +0100") Message-ID: <87aa5bbqrc.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 655C062A-477F-11E1-A3C3-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hi Ludovic, I pushed a couple patches that should help this bug out, though for some reason I wasn't able to reproduce the issue before. I wonder why. On Wed 25 Jan 2012 17:10, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > So I looked into it, and there=E2=80=99s at least one thing wrong: the te= st must > be compiled with #:partial-eval? #f, otherwise the =E2=80=98let=E2=80=99 = vanishes, which > defeats the test. Indeed. I think I fixed that now. > Second thing, it suffices to insert a function call like > ((lambda (x) #f) #f) just before calls to =E2=80=98gc=E2=80=99 to solve t= he problem. Strange. Another thing was that the function was a constant, not a closure, so it wasn't going to be collectable in the first place. Can you retry the test now, Dale? Thanks, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/ From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:12:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10336: Holidays vs. release Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10336 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Cc: Andy Wingo , 10336@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10336-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10336.132752372425973 (code B ref 10336); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:36:01 +0000 Received: (at 10336) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2012 20:35:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43916 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq9Yx-0006kr-Mm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:35:23 -0500 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:49056) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq9Yv-0006kd-7b for 10336@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:35:22 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,570,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="141432894" Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO pluto) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 25 Jan 2012 21:34:46 +0100 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20111220210919.0YNV7.4169.root@cdptpa-web14-z02> <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> <87pqez9g22.fsf@gnu.org> <87mx9bkbjy.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:34:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mx9bkbjy.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Court\=E8s\?\= \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?\=22's\?\= message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:10:41 +0100") Message-ID: <878vkvikre.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) Hello, Andy Wingo skribis: > I pushed a couple patches that should help this bug out, As I wrote, it doesn=E2=80=99t solve the problem. :-/ However, I suspect it=E2=80=99s just one or two words on the stack that fai= l to be cleared, which is why I ended up looking at the assembly in search of a real bug. > Can you retry the test now, Dale? It=E2=80=99s retried at every commit. ;-) http://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/gnu/guile-2-0/ (It=E2=80=99s on i686-linux-gnu.) Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:12:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10336: Holidays vs. release Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10336 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Cc: dsmich@roadrunner.com, 10336@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10336-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10336.13275327747218 (code B ref 10336); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:07:01 +0000 Received: (at 10336) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2012 23:06:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44085 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqBuv-0001sN-JG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:06:14 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:38228 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqBul-0001s7-NX for 10336@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:06:12 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A729FF8; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:05:34 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=JnRq0Budk+3d JkBihUE8ZSEHApc=; b=AtJP61UkQ2dCbMnVZ5VUk7Q1GBT2IEUAArK4vonAO18/ UgneDKuFai4Urlw5PFSNCEOZukl/65LuCDdtXXmqRzZekNM4Qog/uAreEspx4siJ V04SH0+fr5iUCuXqQG7zRkihavIzP+1S8auj8S7m37LzYcIGwo07a7AUlUAcTcA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kKC2Q7 v7diu9VtkkLv1ChlghVmCCxHszkXikhEKqerbe09Vtl+YnNpRf7s2X9iJy/5d/dt bkS1QKMF01q1R6TYdEaqgKbHVXcgMpKoyarJ02yNOpfNu1T2qrXBRXRCG3uu3qXx s4eU7HCx+8i3oEaw3JEstnzYD/PRaksP40/aE= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828C29FF7; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:05:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2C279FF5; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:05:33 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo References: <20111220210919.0YNV7.4169.root@cdptpa-web14-z02> <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> <87pqez9g22.fsf@gnu.org> <87mx9bkbjy.fsf@gnu.org> <878vkvikre.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:05:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878vkvikre.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:34:45 +0100") Message-ID: <8762fzbcxx.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 15E3AFD8-47A9-11E1-94C9-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hi, On Wed 25 Jan 2012 21:34, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Andy Wingo skribis: > >> I pushed a couple patches that should help this bug out, > > As I wrote, it doesn=E2=80=99t solve the problem. :-/ Ah sorry, I misunderstood. > I suspect it=E2=80=99s just one or two words on the stack that fail to be > cleared, which is why I ended up looking at the assembly in search of > a real bug. Interesting. That would explain why it would be architecture-specific, as well. Thanks for the patience :) Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/ From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:12:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10336: Holidays vs. release References: <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> Resent-From: Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10336 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Andy Wingo Cc: 10336@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10336-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10336.132755286916426 (code B ref 10336); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:42:02 +0000 Received: (at 10336) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2012 04:41:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqH8v-0004Gj-T2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:41:08 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:8774) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqH8o-0004GB-Je for 10336@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:41:00 -0500 Authentication-Results: cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com smtp.user=dsmich@roadrunner.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=ad3jbGUt c=1 sm=0 a=UIyOkF2rswIA:10 a=zTVDa7HKqxcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ybZZDoGAAAAA:8 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=rk5CBB1YCikIIzHXNi0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=qIVjreYYsbEA:10 a=ii61gXl28gQA:10 a=O8Q5qNTgwofbtOQ0FzitMg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Received: from [10.127.132.103] ([10.127.132.103:45706] helo=cdptpa-web12-z01) by cdptpa-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTPA id E3/EC-01110-239D02F4; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:40:19 +0000 Message-ID: <20120126044019.EVVQZ.108994.root@cdptpa-web12-z01> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:40:18 -0500 From: In-Reply-To: <87aa5bbqrc.fsf@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal X-Originating-IP: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) ---- Andy Wingo wrote:=20 > Hi Ludovic, >=20 > I pushed a couple patches that should help this bug out, though for some > reason I wasn't able to reproduce the issue before. I wonder why. >=20 > On Wed 25 Jan 2012 17:10, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >=20 > > So I looked into it, and there=E2=80=99s at least one thing wrong: the = test must > > be compiled with #:partial-eval? #f, otherwise the =E2=80=98let=E2=80= =99 vanishes, which > > defeats the test. >=20 > Indeed. I think I fixed that now. >=20 > > Second thing, it suffices to insert a function call like > > ((lambda (x) #f) #f) just before calls to =E2=80=98gc=E2=80=99 to solve= the problem. >=20 > Strange. Another thing was that the function was a constant, not a > closure, so it wasn't going to be collectable in the first place. >=20 > Can you retry the test now, Dale? Sure. v2.0.3-190-gf5e772b still has the same failure. -Dale From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:12:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10336: lexical vars are collectable test is failing Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10336 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Cc: dsmich@roadrunner.com, 10336@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 10336-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10336.13276894204890 (code B ref 10336); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:37:01 +0000 Received: (at 10336) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2012 18:37:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47039 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqqfS-0001Gl-T9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:37:00 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:37643 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqqfP-0001Gc-J4 for 10336@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:36:56 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548A387BF; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:36:16 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=+B2YkAJNfNef aqh2G/1bDkDo7rQ=; b=Y5vfVPypYuGZiglCffPLmokhagkaBL/659dhaKRRrSvK 0DAav1tzc+ezTp6n0dGCcMaVN7Bu1xmE7PV5vItZO9FYlqxDFsyEa22p65e8zV9K hZwjXE3NJvSKwpowArOH4CclRzsw4rGC/WfPBdxPsIq5KuZyOCG0Pn/744Wu3PA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=TV1n7Q bIc/+/LxGs/q4LMNaDkUGiQak5Pi4Hr4TWXgkOXLz1TU9sewfzK13s8J9f+e/t31 DiJDhWmHycP9HUc0pyiQ4GPKUrBkaTs9Gv6lCSyrH5cnVMvGP8dFxVTOcMWLJlGn zStB9aSwldDzf2yrkkRq2ZpRI0Mq2JEQ3aRcI= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6D087BD; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:36:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD90C87BC; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:36:15 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo References: <20111220210919.0YNV7.4169.root@cdptpa-web14-z02> <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> <87pqez9g22.fsf@gnu.org> <87mx9bkbjy.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:36:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mx9bkbjy.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:10:41 +0100") Message-ID: <87mx99f0wz.fsf_-_@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CBB48B94-4915-11E1-BFF1-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) retitle 10366 lexical vars are collectable test is failing On Wed 25 Jan 2012 17:10, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Second thing, it suffices to insert a function call like > ((lambda (x) #f) #f) just before calls to =E2=80=98gc=E2=80=99 to solve t= he problem. > > So I=E2=80=99m thinking we may have a real bug here. I pushed an experimental patch that attempts to NULL out variables that are local to the VM. Let's see what hydra does with it. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/ From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:12:43 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Subject: bug#10336: closed (Re: bug#10336: lexical vars are collectable test is failing) Message-ID: References: <87pqdyp2kr.fsf@pobox.com> <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 10336 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guile Reply-To: 10336@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:17:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1328138222-23330-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1328138222-23330-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #10336: Holidays vs. release which was filed against the guile package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 10336@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 10336: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D10336 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1328138222-23330-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 10336-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 23:16:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49649 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsjPm-00063a-Qe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:16:35 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:61801 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsjPk-00063S-Kb for 10336-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:16:33 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29EE9B1D; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:16:08 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=BV4psQ7XG0f0 2QQfvRPx1FNDwl8=; b=DKavmdzxVOuloi4jlnfKgLeO1EIh5k9qp8S8Rnq0+Gwv wxpGTG4mlTzsSuVjosHAiD0/M49guDsmuWV2KhkegT/tt0f7U5rpi/K5cZoM/lZe BczE7irfMUgTi/DdQY2c8igzEvutEZxKiRnbIpoRantFOHD50pqeoLILCtm3WoE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qAxswv 6ZF2/yTDOrE3Qzi+gb13plpcagZz9Gg4l3oWTa7HtDVJmfFl4D4Xgzjk/hWxx2PU WvZfRSeMgF7dYzlclb5aNrbNbnKcCeNBXcD1nUwr70ukVvamSRji45v8KJFqbqt9 9UxhciF7rbnjpQlNKFp1xtXB9azzpIDfILcmY= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5B69B1C; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:16:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 445FD9B1B; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:16:08 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: bug#10336: lexical vars are collectable test is failing References: <20111220210919.0YNV7.4169.root@cdptpa-web14-z02> <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> <87pqez9g22.fsf@gnu.org> <87mx9bkbjy.fsf@gnu.org> <87mx99f0wz.fsf_-_@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:16:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mx99f0wz.fsf_-_@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:36:12 +0100") Message-ID: <87pqdyp2kr.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B8ED377C-4D2A-11E1-ABD9-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10336-done Cc: 10336-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Fri 27 Jan 2012 19:36, Andy Wingo writes: > On Wed 25 Jan 2012 17:10, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Second thing, it suffices to insert a function call like >> ((lambda (x) #f) #f) just before calls to =E2=80=98gc=E2=80=99 to solve = the problem. >> >> So I=E2=80=99m thinking we may have a real bug here. > > I pushed an experimental patch that attempts to NULL out variables that > are local to the VM. Let's see what hydra does with it. In the end that failed. I pushed a different patch that tried to NULL out recursively called C stack frames. Perhaps it worked? As tests are passing, I will close this one for now. It's possible that simply recursing through the VM wouldn't work well, as there might be stack slots in vm_engine that don't get set in all code paths. If we see errors in the future, let's just mark those as flaky and move on. Let's also try to reduce the number of UNRESOLVED results in general, so that these hacks will be more visible. Regards, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/ ------------=_1328138222-23330-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2011 05:36:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RdEqV-0002m0-2l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:36:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RdAYu-0004HT-CP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:01:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdAWw-0004FV-EA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:39 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:53491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdAWw-0004FR-Ci for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdAWv-0002zy-91 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdAWt-0004Ep-R4 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:37 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:10775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdAWt-0004Ek-LW for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:35 -0500 Authentication-Results: cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com smtp.user=dsmich@roadrunner.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=APbyNIPv c=1 sm=0 a=zTVDa7HKqxcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=doupyKFmAAAA:8 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=xGcgWY__ISYfmqExNpEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=0vUscowIxtUA:10 a=ii61gXl28gQA:10 a=KP/YX84if8whyb+LKdk8pQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Received: from [10.127.132.106] ([10.127.132.106:40500] helo=cdptpa-web15-z01) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTPA id BC/96-19251-67F21FE4; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:59:34 +0000 Message-ID: <20111221005934.KW79Q.70655.root@cdptpa-web15-z01> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:59:34 -0500 From: To: guile-devel@gnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= , dsmich@roadrunner.com, bug-guile@gnu.org Subject: Re: Holidays vs. release In-Reply-To: <20111220210919.0YNV7.4169.root@cdptpa-web14-z02> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal X-Originating-IP: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:36:05 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) ---- dsmich@roadrunner.com wrote:=20 >=20 > ---- "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s" wrote:=20 > > Hello Guilers! > >=20 > > I initially thought it would be great to push a 2.0.4 tarball by the en= d > > of the year, but since I=E2=80=99ll be on holidays starting from tomorr= ow until > > Jan. 3rd, I won=E2=80=99t be able to make it. Sorry about that! >=20 > I'm still getting that one failure in make check. Something about gc a l= exicals? (Sorry I'm not at that machine.) Probably would be a good idea t= o tune that up before release anyway. >=20 > I'll post details when I can. I'm on a 32bit Debian intel system. libgc is 7.2alpha4 git describe is v2.0.3-82-ga2c6601 The single failure running make check is Running gc.test FAIL: gc.test: gc: Lexical vars are collectable -Dale ------------=_1328138222-23330-1--