GNU bug report logs - #10305
coreutils-8.14, "rm -r" fails with EBADF

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: "Joachim Schmitz" <jojo <at> schmitz-digital.de>

Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:08:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: notabug

Full log


Message #147 received at 10305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Joachim Schmitz" <jojo <at> schmitz-digital.de>
To: "'Jim Meyering'" <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: 'Paul Eggert' <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>, bug-gnulib <at> gnu.org, nagendra.vs <at> hp.com,
	10305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, "'Schmitz, Joachim'" <schmitz <at> hp.com>,
	'Eric Blake' <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Subject: RE: bug#10305: coreutils-8.14, "rm -r" fails with EBADF
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:52:09 +0200
> From: Jim Meyering [mailto:jim <at> meyering.net]
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 3:48 PM
> To: Joachim Schmitz
> Cc: 'Paul Eggert'; 10305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; bug-gnulib <at> gnu.org; 'Eric
Blake';
> 'Schmitz, Joachim'; nagendra.vs <at> hp.com
> Subject: Re: bug#10305: coreutils-8.14, "rm -r" fails with EBADF
> 
> Joachim Schmitz wrote:
> ...
> > I just saw that my patch removed 2 functions more than your's, mine
> > also removes cache_stat_ok() and is_nondir_lstat().
> > Intention? Used where?
> 
> Hah!  I should have temporarily defined-away "inline" to be sure I'd
removed
> all of them -- then gcc warns about each defined-but-not-used function.
I've
> just done that.  Those two in remove.c are the only ones in src/.
> 
> As penance, I'll do this one for you, too.

;-) Thanks!

Is anyone looking into my other patches too?





This bug report was last modified 12 years and 110 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.