From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:27:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10292: following symlinks in byte-recompile-directory Resent-From: Sam Aaron Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 10292 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 10292@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13238022069596 (code B ref -1); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:51:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2011 18:50:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RaXQU-0002Ue-2f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:50:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RaTHL-0003sT-Gu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:24:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaTG0-0001hA-VE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:23:05 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:54724) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaTG0-0001h6-Tj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:23:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57911) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaTFz-00089a-TG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:23:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaTFv-0001gq-Lc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:22:59 -0500 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:49339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaTFv-0001gW-EI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:22:55 -0500 Received: by lahi5 with SMTP id i5so2898739lah.0 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:22:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=J9JBGIAV3nhhpdzpLv98l8ltb78aGKaXIrTYvSnq8l0=; b=PUufHS7tLYJ5rU0VHenu/1ETnh+xQAnhwDo4TiPnD42E4UOmHFsIblLxVc8oYLHjB3 b7Wbk2y5EmbEmoPdVn/7K47wCJ9nP5zJhqbNYkXQ37ViCsoz+Kve1watdIqj33ZmNHFN J7GFyMHeon8fLyr4Z8uYHuDoBlzwh75GnW2cE= Received: by 10.152.144.136 with SMTP id sm8mr15224882lab.33.1323786173878; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:22:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from c0177.aw.cl.cam.ac.uk (c0177.aw.cl.cam.ac.uk. [128.232.100.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jn4sm5045990lab.16.2011.12.13.06.22.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:22:52 -0800 (PST) From: Sam Aaron Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:22:50 +0000 Message-Id: <5282474D-19E0-4646-B65D-134CA6967F0A@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:50:02 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) Hi there, I noticed that the implementation of byte-recompile-directory has = specific code to not allow symlinks to be followed. As I use symlinks to = structure my ~/.emacs.d directory, this means this fn doesn't work for = me. Is there any specific motivation for not having the following = signature:=20 (byte-recompile-directory-sl DIRECTORY &optional ARG FORCE = FOLLOW-SYMLINKS) Sam --- http://sam.aaron.name= From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:27:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10292: following symlinks in byte-recompile-directory Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 05:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10292 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Sam Aaron Cc: 10292@debbugs.gnu.org, "Richard M. Stallman" Received: via spool by 10292-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10292.156610759611314 (code B ref 10292); Sun, 18 Aug 2019 05:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 10292) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2019 05:53:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57279 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hzE7w-0002wQ-5l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 01:53:16 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:34242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hzE7t-0002wG-Sz for 10292@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 01:53:15 -0400 Received: from [50.225.213.182] (helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hzE7p-0007tY-7r; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 07:53:12 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <5282474D-19E0-4646-B65D-134CA6967F0A@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 22:53:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: <5282474D-19E0-4646-B65D-134CA6967F0A@gmail.com> (Sam Aaron's message of "Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:22:50 +0000") Message-ID: <8736hz6mv1.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Sam Aaron writes: > I noticed that the implementation of byte-recompile-directory has > specific code to not allow symlinks to be followed. As I use symlinks > to structure my ~/.emacs.d directory, this means this fn d [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sam Aaron writes: > I noticed that the implementation of byte-recompile-directory has > specific code to not allow symlinks to be followed. As I use symlinks > to structure my ~/.emacs.d directory, this means this fn doesn't work > for me. Is there any specific motivation for not having the following > signature: > > (byte-recompile-directory-sl DIRECTORY &optional ARG FORCE FOLLOW-SYMLINKS) (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately have gotten no responses yet.) Not following symlinks introduced in 1993, but the commit message doesn't explain why: commit e9681c45f9ffd2819410b763338ba58b0b892b78 Author: Richard M. Stallman Date: Thu Dec 23 03:37:27 1993 +0000 (byte-compile-dest-file): If FILENAME is not recognized, append .elc to it. (byte-recompile-directory): Don't treat symlinks as dirs. (batch-byte-recompile-directory): Add autoload cookie. Adding a parameter to the function to follow symlinks seems pretty harmless, and seems somewhat useful, so I think it should be added. Does anybody object to that? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:27:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10292: following symlinks in byte-recompile-directory Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 10:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10292 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: Sam Aaron , 10292@debbugs.gnu.org, "Richard M. Stallman" Received: via spool by 10292-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10292.160629926313229 (code B ref 10292); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 10:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 10292) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2020 10:14:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34485 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khrod-0003RI-DM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 05:14:23 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com ([209.85.218.51]:38766) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khrob-0003R6-Dp for 10292@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 05:14:21 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id a16so2215906ejj.5 for <10292@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:14:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AZyIhuXgSHz6Qt/Bzkuj+KyxcWAQWrU3uZXUw8YaTgU=; b=cTwDkqcDFt0JWwiYPk0UF+8IULQoJ6O/S9jdgdxlnWYuAfR2P9KGordsUVyydSf+kf SomXKD+VlhgoCAK7ZCpNb57WZ0fg7AhT6cdYVf1XCq96bBwySDBpmxzTV1EhzuRPl1sC VJRN4BvSDnvpCC9YWXq6KQfxHRibyhGJyL6YlQ57JH/ez1KKSGh6sivjpxNPzvHRTKhH 2/3KhWgHA2PfrnBrcp1bkEMpS4q5KKuO8C99hA+VVjW5gEtUlCpH9qyDFZCECDKIh311 canjgBb/ZfgCt9UxT7fyRbqtI6oq4Wbg8rvxLjWoK5IjwsMP01KQeSCkcTfPFT0Ft32B AoAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533VuQFFro+4FB0KSDsTvpTULVOtXMDMbqJh2mi1fFgJDLW3hnOG QraKwMLu0stnCf7l6sO+23CpWCjjOcoFibTt/eY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHepiYVntw8OVXn4MhAdcMfHjQIJrdo6pEep3WCEhhoPO0zN3rVwDS8xovDA7PCM01TLhq8RCYptCNILrWRaI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8058:: with SMTP id x24mr2595785ejw.272.1606299255755; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:14:15 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <8736hz6mv1.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 17 Aug 2019 22:53:06 -0700") References: <5282474D-19E0-4646-B65D-134CA6967F0A@gmail.com> <8736hz6mv1.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:14:15 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Sam Aaron writes: > >> I noticed that the implementation of byte-recompile-directory has >> specific code to not allow symlinks to be followed. As I use symlinks >> to structure my ~/.emacs.d directory, this means this fn doesn't work >> for me. Is there any specific motivation for not having the following >> signature: >> >> (byte-recompile-directory-sl DIRECTORY &optional ARG FORCE FOLLOW-SYMLINKS) > > (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately have gotten no > responses yet.) > > Not following symlinks introduced in 1993, but the commit message > doesn't explain why: > > commit e9681c45f9ffd2819410b763338ba58b0b892b78 > Author: Richard M. Stallman > Date: Thu Dec 23 03:37:27 1993 +0000 > > (byte-compile-dest-file): If FILENAME is not recognized, append .elc to it. > > (byte-recompile-directory): Don't treat symlinks as dirs. > > (batch-byte-recompile-directory): Add autoload cookie. > > Adding a parameter to the function to follow symlinks seems pretty > harmless, and seems somewhat useful, so I think it should be added. Yes, I agree. > Does anybody object to that? Let's assume no, since there has been no replies in the last year. :-) From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:27:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#10292: following symlinks in byte-recompile-directory Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10292 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Stefan Kangas Cc: Sam Aaron , 10292@debbugs.gnu.org, "Richard M. Stallman" Received: via spool by 10292-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10292.160638486527127 (code B ref 10292); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 10292) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2020 10:01:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38464 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiE5J-00073P-0H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 05:01:05 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47596) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiE5H-00072e-Hi for 10292@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 05:01:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7rEed15PxN8zlc6IY0XFgz3dseTi8ynnfMaYI3ghrLE=; b=TWcZcCDhX//xN7JbnWWNogaUN5 ZS8X7IPO/A+Bf4P0dPwiQvujjE5jYPEcVfuGxvMhx+COKog7rVwW5uiuq+YEvaU99srWDRmds2Pba bEPJnzh0RyNtuM8CKJrVdw7qgLYyihVkd5LQEDwlZ/lX4Qwnojaaze4bF4ezaC9+rTt4=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kiE57-0008Rh-HO; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:00:56 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <5282474D-19E0-4646-B65D-134CA6967F0A@gmail.com> <8736hz6mv1.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Tuxedomoon's _Desire_: "Desire" Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:00:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 25 Nov 2020 02:14:15 -0800") Message-ID: <877dq8zbcb.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: >> Adding a parameter to the function to follow symlinks seems pretty >> harmless, and seems somewhat useful, so I think it should be added. > > Yes, I agree. > >> Does anybody object to that? > > Let [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: >> Adding a parameter to the function to follow symlinks seems pretty >> harmless, and seems somewhat useful, so I think it should be added. > > Yes, I agree. > >> Does anybody object to that? > > Let's assume no, since there has been no replies in the last year. :-) :-) Now pushed to Emacs 28. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 26 05:01:13 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2020 10:01:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38473 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiE5R-00073x-Jt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 05:01:13 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47616) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiE5Q-00073c-H6 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 05:01:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ypo0faU9NmKdSlOHKac7HCH14j878TzX8cLHqDNluFE=; b=mUeiCOjeSiM3cJGMGY3jhv6bQX E5ncIRLRlU0PuTmvcEu+9atd62F0ylqkn+h74SSTV3W6Zwx13Zv0aeZmzXqQXS57n5V798rqHuV0k KzlhLSwxFtvxAg4ywunKgb12zy6kfz5mcBITYiUOmPxCRLdIOiGJ9FpgOMYQnEeUrHZQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kiE5F-0008Rq-0U for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:01:06 +0100 Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:01:00 +0100 Message-Id: <875z5szbc3.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #10292 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 10292 fixed close 10292 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 10292 fixed close 10292 28.1 quit