GNU bug report logs -
#10281
du: hard-links counting with multiple arguments (commit
Previous Next
Reported by: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:02:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: wontfix
Merged with 10282,
11526
Done: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #102 received at 10281 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Elliott Forney wrote:
> $ du -ks tmp tmp/bash
> 1033864 tmp
>
> $ du -ks tmp/bash tmp
> 182684 tmp/bash
> 851180 tmp
>
> The size of tmp is underrepresented even though there are no links.
>
----
Is it? I mean is it showing less space that the sum of the
files in the tmp dir exclusive of the directory you singled out
for a separate totally?
I.e. by singling out tmp/bash, it could easily be taken that you
want it be be tallied separately from tmp and not have it's space
included -- vs. the way you seem to want it -- which would be to
provide a total.
In the specific example you show, du -cks shows what you want,
but easily might not depending on your args.
The only way to do what you want would be to have a running tree
mode, where another column displays. a running total for the dirs
you specified that has 1 column being a total of everything under
it, and a 2nd column that shows that total with any dirs specified
on the command line removed from the tally:
Ex: supposed we have dirs w/sizes of files in the dirs
a:100
a/b:100, a/c:100, a/d:100,
a/b/e:100
a2:100
---
If I specified:
du [some-trigger-arg] a/b/e a/b a a2
100 100 a/b/e
200 100 a/b
500 300 a #**
100 100 a2
** 2nd number includes dirs 'c' and 'd' as they were not mentioned
separately.
I'm not sure what the cost/benefit ratio is on this, at this
time... might rise.
Though you'd also have to be specific -- what would happen
if the files in a/b/e were hard links to 'a'... output
could still be different than what you wanted. Maybe a perl
script to munge the output? then an alias and/or function to
call your extension when you wanted?
alias would be easy, but if you wanted to get fancy,
you could make a:
function du_special
}
function du {
.. if flag1=myflag, run du_special else
'du' "$@" ## run real du...
}
I asked for the -h on sort about 5-6 years ago, but
no one wanted it then... now it's just there. Unfortunately
I find that I'm often some number of years ahead of where
critical mass to have something happen is...;-/
Just some random suggesting...
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 303 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.