From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 10 16:34:26 2011 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2011 21:34:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RZUYr-0000t7-Km for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:34:26 -0500 Received: from rage.so36.net ([83.223.73.105]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RZUYp-0000t0-Qp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:34:24 -0500 Received: (qmail 28196 invoked by uid 90); 10 Dec 2011 21:33:20 -0000 Message-ID: <20111210213320.28189.qmail@rage.so36.net> From: "sindikat" To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Internal links ? Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:33:20 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Package: emacs-xwidgets Internal links work everywhere, where i checked, but possible the code on them is unfinished. Internal links definitely work on Emacswiki and Wikipedia Quote: >>>ive added a rudimentary function "xwidget-webkit-show-named-element" for this >>Running the function itself with named element id works, but clicking on links to section - doesn't. Also, clicking on section links eats much CPU (checked on wikipedia articles) >i made some notes in readme.xwidget. relative links actually work now for simple sites like emacswiki anyway From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 19 19:56:20 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2016 00:56:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54225 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aLh4O-00074B-9p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:56:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aLh4M-00073y-HL for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:56:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLh4G-00085r-M8 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:56:13 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40, LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLh4G-00085l-Ih for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:56:12 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aLh4G-0004li-8t for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:56:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <22174.56107.871011.440944@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:56:11 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: GNU bug tracker automated control server Subject: control X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) # We get to inherit these unanswered reports, lucky us! reassign 10265 emacs,emacs-xwidgets reassign 10266 emacs,emacs-xwidgets reassign 10267 emacs,emacs-xwidgets reassign 10268 emacs,emacs-xwidgets reassign 10269 emacs,emacs-xwidgets reassign 10270 emacs,emacs-xwidgets reassign 10272 emacs,emacs-xwidgets From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 01 21:16:27 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2020 01:16:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57742 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDHNy-0006bn-T7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 21:16:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com ([209.85.218.51]:33282) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDHNv-0006Ua-Ew for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 21:16:24 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id h4so4298379ejj.0 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 18:16:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XMSMQo8Lwyr6vtoNVee1IM6gB6774LGbw3ekGnCm6Fc=; b=KqKSt9DfJLiF5Lvz9A7ZcvSiLcJXHQ2uW72TNER9C4m5w5EThUChXLTwVMl0ddURlc KtjwxDV/LFdiJnyvVSBuakbvJ5gp2s61M8Z2dHMe9Vs4XFxtjkacqBuLr7hsAZhWcOoi SSHgQyhuJeD0/aE0Cm6UJ5HcL0V7S3v3EkqO8lyXyLCwRjO7pDqlYH5dZ3uqHgAPahgn QPOGoXTqYyWuqUgtp8ofE3Z4INFpuRG33H8qdEHZD77BRBs7FXhT4itR7FrC2HSluJ7M xPWUesiqdgRtO+ehrlhAe6eTzkydwaDFBZRSwvroxT/Dx82abRfJ+ZRdakBR68Z28B+E 4xcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532lRBS12eWz3w0ObGOwHZ9Il54KlhNxjUKkHsQD7tnGZG24kpc4 9dV0eOZFFnmsONeRvIwGQaHCDxwPCJyyrUSGgktBOEC1 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwk0CQCOHlRgx0D+gv8x9RZ7YwIG5V90UFMIk8z/J9XsyvhQ/9a4OYRGZHQYq6kCrOpKvreVAuo6L/8CmWcO7k= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:bb0e:: with SMTP id jz14mr4252840ejb.525.1599009377421; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 18:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:16:16 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:16:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: retitle 10269 xwidgets: Popping message boxes tags 10269 + moreinfo retitle 10268 xwidgets: Internal links needs work ? tags 10268 + moreinfo thanks Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.218.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.218.51 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: retitle 10269 xwidgets: Popping message boxes tags 10269 + moreinfo retitle 10268 xwidgets: Internal links needs work ? tags 10268 + moreinfo thanks Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.218.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.218.51 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different retitle 10269 xwidgets: Popping message boxes tags 10269 + moreinfo retitle 10268 xwidgets: Internal links needs work ? tags 10268 + moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 01 21:18:46 2020 Received: (at 10268-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2020 01:18:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57747 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDHQE-0007gD-Bx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 21:18:46 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f68.google.com ([209.85.218.68]:44725) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDHQC-0007fy-Bl for 10268-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 21:18:45 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f68.google.com with SMTP id a15so1626625ejf.11 for <10268-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 18:18:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kQAhEdAtA7AzA2LiGAcdgL3s4qCqHyZGVqURovvXX0c=; b=GhCJOU+qoDmcm57osLzOMWhARIljj7dSNKDo1J6vH31eHDflXkTxFUkHfuu83NgMYP +3nmXc6phZkRpLDmnW8uLH6GH6tOYDVnshuUlJo1jmtEoXkM+XDEl67/gV/CEu9ydWYC O2Pz17XbfgGvSVVWnJpBD9iNVo10cULBzbnolr2TVFOzGCdZ4O5VQGtWWiK6ClzcoQ7p bOBVcoK3cReSR7yvgCMuAlh0h5Ud1STNIr5+9YQwKC6TfsZogEOBFID7Pyikc+nzBQmf ze+ug7hV0eOUrXxKjHUmVoNNkMRAu3CMDomNYVFyehYU+EXHfvtVQpEM7pgxbIzX8AJE 7mHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gnAux3PojfcAzFC1eG4Lti9TMKISCSWERkRb8vN+1S74M5cGx YvufgwJKqtmAT3NEc9PSoTrxMdTgfDNHUzZi5K75iEls X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyR9ntkSalEDVmUf++NylaL70dKkRtcyOFKsuQzwSvQcaErZ/pAe1bW7xFH4LXMkKNQt80EijpGVCqmGcy7cj0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3a02:: with SMTP id z2mr3964206eje.287.1599009518790; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 18:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:18:38 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <20111210213320.28189.qmail@rage.so36.net> (sindikat@mail36.net's message of "Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:33:20 +0100") References: <20111210213320.28189.qmail@rage.so36.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 18:18:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#10268: Internal links ? To: sindikat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 10268-done Cc: 10268-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) "sindikat" writes: > Package: emacs-xwidgets Internal links work everywhere, where i checked, but > possible the code on them is unfinished. Internal links definitely work on > Emacswiki and Wikipedia Quote: >>>>ive added a rudimentary function "xwidget-webkit-show-named-element" for this >>>Running the function itself with named element id works, but clicking on links to section - doesn't. Also, clicking on section links eats much CPU (checked on wikipedia articles) >>i made some notes in readme.xwidget. relative links actually work now for simple sites like emacswiki anyway (That was 8 years ago.) I have no idea if that needs more work or not. To find out, someone needs to test it and then possibly point to some concrete issue or improvement that would need to be made. We can only hope that if and when users test this feature and encounter problems, they will report it as bugs or feature requests. Unfortunately, I see nothing actionable here beyond that, so I'm closing this bug report now. If you believe that this conclusion is incorrect, please reply to this email (use "Reply to all" in your email client) and we can reopen the bug report. Thanks. Best regards, Stefan Kangas From unknown Sun Sep 07 00:05:50 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator