GNU bug report logs - #10246
R6RS library form broken?

Previous Next

Full log

Message #13 received at 10246-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: Ian Price <ianprice90 <at> googlemail.com>
Cc: Tobias Brandt <tob.brandt <at> googlemail.com>, 10246-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#10246: R6RS library form broken?
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:05:34 +0100

On Thu 08 Dec 2011 00:00, Ian Price <ianprice90 <at> googlemail.com> writes:

> Tobias Brandt <tob.brandt <at> googlemail.com> writes:
>
>> (library (foo))
>
> This is a misunderstanding on your part, I'm afraid. R6RS library forms
> are intended to wrap the code[0]; they are not declarations to be placed at
> the top. The manual does mention this[1], by noting the syntax for library
> is
>
> (library name (export export-spec ...) (import import-spec ...) body ...)

Indeed.  Thanks for the answer, Ian.

In the new email-happy bug system, to close a bug you edit the Cc: list
to add -done after the bug number, as I have done here.  Feel free to do
this for any bug that you feel is done; if we make a mistake, we can
simply re-open it.

I'm sure we could do better accounting as to the kind of resolution and
such, but I'm most concern with simply marking bugs as being resolved.

Regards, and happy hacking to you both :-)

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.